Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
METHODS Experimental design - A preliminary (pilot) survey was carried out during February 1997 to give an indication of the spatial distribution of P. elegans within the small- scale patches which were investigated in Chapter 2, and to determine adult densities so that a suitable core size could be used for the main survey. To achieve this, 1 P. elegans patch was randomly chosen and its centre sampled with a box-core containing 49 contiguous 3x3crn cores, together with 32 cores around the edge of the box-core. The survey therefore consisted of 81 contiguous cores forming a 9x9 array, with samples taken to a depth of 10cm (Figure 7.1). 3cm 3cm .4-1. . 27cm 27cm Figure 7.1: Diagram showing the positions of the 81 3x3cm cores for the pilot survey with the position of the box-core highlighted. Samples were taken to a depth of 10cm. The sediments from the cores were preserved with 10% saline formaldehyde solution neutralised with 0.2% Borax, stained with 0.01% Rose Bengal and stored. The samples were later washed with water over a 5001.tm mesh sieve. The samples were then sorted using a magnifying lens and the numbers of P. elegans individuals in each sample counted. 175
A more detailed investigation of micro-scale spatial patterns of P. elegans was then carried out. For this, cores were positioned linearly forming a transect rather than forming an array as in the pilot survey. Although with this transect approach the spatial distribution investigated was linear, and thus may have been influenced by the direction of the line, it allowed a larger proportion of the P. elegans patch to be sampled. Since each transect consisted of only 32 cores, 3 different patches could be sampled each month. Sampling 3 patches each month overcame the linear bias of the transect to a certain extent. The 3 patches were determined by random numbers each month and the 32 cores forming a contiguous transect taken across them. Taking 3 replicate transects also limited the chance of any variability between P. elegans patches being misinterpreted as temporal changes in micro-scale spatial patterns. Thirty-two cores were chosen as a compromise between the practical work involved and the number of samples needed to give enough sample pairs (i.e., 40, Sokal, 1986) for reliable spatial autocorrelation analysis. Furthermore, 32 cores, i.e., 96cm, encompassed most of the patch in one direction for the majority of patches. The samples, which also provided the data on the population structure and reproductive strategy of P. elegans (Chapter 3), were taken at the beginning of each month from March 1997 until August 1997, and then every other month until February 1998. After August 1997, it was decided that sampling alternate months only was necessary since the main recruitment phase of the year had already occurred. It was more important to sample as often as possible during the recruitment phase in order to investigate adult-larval interactions. The samples were treated and stored in the same way as described for the pilot survey. These samples were washed over a 212).tm mesh sieve in addition to the 500iim mesh sieve so that the numbers of newly settled individuals could be determined for each sample. The samples were elutriated as described in Chapter 6 and the numbers of 'adults' (those with a 5th setiger width 0.30mm) and new recruits (those below a 5th setiger width of 0.30mm), were counted. The size separation for new recruits was determined from the size-frequency graphs in Chapter 3 (Figure 3.3(iii)) to distinguish those individuals which had settled after the previous sampling occasion. Those individuals above a 5th setiger width 0.30mm will be referred to as 'adults' for this 176
- Page 140 and 141: eason why some invertebrates showed
- Page 142 and 143: This study did not set out to expli
- Page 144 and 145: This reliance upon the early establ
- Page 146 and 147: CHAPTER 6 INITIAL COLONISATION OF D
- Page 148 and 149: esulting community at any stage of
- Page 150 and 151: ambient sediment had been removed.
- Page 152 and 153: emoved since they were the only tax
- Page 154 and 155: All statistics were performed using
- Page 156 and 157: RESULTS Univariate analysis of spec
- Page 158 and 159: 3.5 3 5 2 11 5 1 0.5 0 40 35 Ca 30
- Page 160 and 161: of non-patch areas (Figure 6.3(vi))
- Page 162 and 163: the individuals colonising patch az
- Page 164 and 165: Multivariate analysis of community
- Page 166 and 167: Month Sample statistic (Global R) N
- Page 168 and 169: 2NP 3NP 4NP .•,, 6NP 5NP 6P 1NP i
- Page 170 and 171: Figure 6.8: Two-dimensional MDS ord
- Page 172 and 173: - - 5P ... 4P . 6P • .‘2NP 1NP
- Page 174 and 175: I 50. 1 60. 70. 80. 90. 100. BRAY-C
- Page 176 and 177: 'P2-AZ P3-AZ N2-AZ .- - - " .„ ..
- Page 178 and 179: o • o -o + 350 — 300 = 250 7 g
- Page 180 and 181: The importance of the ambient commu
- Page 182 and 183: In April, when P. elegans larval av
- Page 184 and 185: not only for errant polychaetes, bu
- Page 186 and 187: observed in this study. How crucial
- Page 188 and 189: Micro-scale spatial patterns of mac
- Page 192 and 193: study. These individuals would not
- Page 194 and 195: RESULTS Pilot survey - The pilot su
- Page 196 and 197: Transect survey - Micro-scale patte
- Page 198 and 199: Month v:m ratio pattern Id pattern
- Page 200 and 201: (i) March 1997, replicate 1 -iAlmiA
- Page 202 and 203: (xix) October 1997, replicate 1 (ra
- Page 204 and 205: The new recruits were only sufficie
- Page 206 and 207: The results of correlation analyses
- Page 208 and 209: cf.) . crt N ,—, Cr) C,1 ,—, Cr
- Page 210 and 211: 1.2 -0.4 "a 0.8 > (i) % Water conte
- Page 212 and 213: examine the micro-scale spatial pat
- Page 214 and 215: Invertebrate larvae, those of polyc
- Page 216 and 217: laboratory observations are needed
- Page 218 and 219: CHAPTER 8 THE FAUNAL COMMUNITIES OF
- Page 220 and 221: Other theories have been postulated
- Page 222 and 223: RESULTS Univariate analysis of spec
- Page 224 and 225: -T. g 80 g 50 40 30 20 10 (i) Adult
- Page 226 and 227: in significant differences in size
- Page 228 and 229: 8.2). This was mainly because of th
- Page 230 and 231: 120 100 80 60 - 40 20 0. cn1 c.n (i
- Page 232 and 233: 3NP 6NP 4NP 1 NP 5NP 2NP : 3P 1P 6P
- Page 234 and 235: 4P 3P 5P 5NP 6P 2P 1P Figure 8.8: T
- Page 236 and 237: Figure 8.10 shows the dendrogram pr
- Page 238 and 239: NP1 NP2 NP2 NP2 NP1 NP1 NP2 NP2 NP2
A more detailed investigation of micro-scale spatial patterns of P. elegans was then<br />
carried out. For this, cores were positioned linearly forming a transect rather than<br />
forming an array as in the pilot survey. Although with this transect approach the<br />
spatial distribution investigated was linear, and thus may have been influenced by the<br />
direction of the line, it allowed a larger proportion of the P. elegans patch to be<br />
sampled. Since each transect consisted of only 32 cores, 3 different patches could be<br />
sampled each month. Sampling 3 patches each month overcame the linear bias of the<br />
transect to a certain extent. The 3 patches were determined by random numbers each<br />
month and the 32 cores forming a contiguous transect taken across them. Taking 3<br />
replicate transects also limited the chance of any variability between P. elegans<br />
patches being misinterpreted as temporal changes in micro-scale spatial patterns.<br />
Thirty-two cores were chosen as a compromise between the practical work involved<br />
and the number of samples needed to give enough sample pairs (i.e., 40, Sokal, 1986)<br />
for reliable spatial autocorrelation analysis. Furthermore, 32 cores, i.e., 96cm,<br />
encompassed most of the patch in one direction for the majority of patches.<br />
The samples, which also provided the data on the population structure and<br />
reproductive strategy of P. elegans (Chapter 3), were taken at the beginning of each<br />
month from March 1997 until August 1997, and then every other month until<br />
February 1998. After August 1997, it was decided that sampling alternate months<br />
only was necessary since the main recruitment phase of the year had already occurred.<br />
It was more important to sample as often as possible during the recruitment phase in<br />
order to investigate adult-larval interactions.<br />
The samples were treated and stored in the same way as described for the pilot survey.<br />
These samples were washed over a 212).tm mesh sieve in addition to the 500iim mesh<br />
sieve so that the numbers of newly settled individuals could be determined for each<br />
sample. The samples were elutriated as described in Chapter 6 and the numbers of<br />
'adults' (those with a 5th setiger width 0.30mm) and new recruits (those below a 5th<br />
setiger width of 0.30mm), were counted. The size separation for new recruits was<br />
determined from the size-frequency graphs in Chapter 3 (Figure 3.3(iii)) to distinguish<br />
those individuals which had settled after the previous sampling occasion. Those<br />
individuals above a 5th setiger width 0.30mm will be referred to as 'adults' for this<br />
176