18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cap itella capitata has planktonic larvae giving widespread dispersal but also<br />

possesses demersal larvae which are completely benthic (Warren, 1976). Shull (1997)<br />

demonstrated that this polychaete was capable of colonising azoic sediments by larval<br />

settlement, bedload transport and by burrowing. C. capitata has a short life cycle, is<br />

capable of reproducing all year round and one female may produce up to 10,000 eggs.<br />

These characteristics allow this species to quickly colonise suitable unoccupied areas<br />

of sediments in vast numbers (Rosenberg, 1973; Grassle and Grassle, 1974). The<br />

size-frequency differences between patch and non-patch colonisers for C. capitata was<br />

only observed during December. It is difficult to suggest the possible reason why<br />

those colonising P. elegans patches were predominantly adults while those colonising<br />

non-patches were mainly larvae but a comparison with the situation in the ambient<br />

sediments reveals a possible explanation. Although not significant, there were higher<br />

densities of C. capitata in patches than in non-patches at this time (23.0±2.9 and<br />

20.1±4.1 respectively, Figure 8.1 (iv)). Furthermore, the size-frequency distributions<br />

were significantly different at this time (Table 8.2) due to a higher proportion of adults<br />

in patch populations. Therefore, the increased proportion of adults colonising azoic<br />

sediments in P. elegans patches in the December experiment may have been a direct<br />

result of the differences in the ambient populations between patches and non-patches<br />

at that time. More adults may have colonised via lateral migration through and/or on<br />

the sediments in patches.<br />

Can sediment disturbance lead to P. elegans patch formation on Drum Sands?<br />

In addition to giving an important insight into differential colonisation of patches<br />

compared with non-patch areas and into to the mode of colonisation of P. elegans in<br />

response to small-scale disturbances, this study has suggested that P. elegans patch<br />

formation on Drum Sands could possibly have resulted from sediment disturbance.<br />

However, since the population relies on a highly seasonal input of planktonic larvae<br />

(Chapter 3) the timing of the disturbance is important. Patch formation could only<br />

have, therefore, resulted from disturbances occurring during the summer or the winter.<br />

It is not always possible to scale-up the results of small-scale disturbance experiments<br />

such as this one to those of larger disturbances (Thrush et al., 1997a, 1997b).<br />

However, it is likely that the mode of P. elegans colonisation following larger-scale<br />

disturbances and consequent successional dynamics would be the same as those<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!