Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier
the individuals colonising patch azoic sediments were distinctly larger than those in non-patch sediments and a skewed size-distribution was apparent for the latter. These tests were significantly different (p
(i) APRIL X 2 goodness of fit K-S Size (mm) 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 >0.40 p-value p-value % Explained 3.27 9.11 22.30 14.83 50.41 0.802 >0.05 (ii) AUGUST X 2 goodness of fit K-S Size (mm) 5_0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 p-value p-value % Explained 11.26 0.43 2.70 85.61 0.009 >0.05 (iii) DECEMBER x2 goodness of fit K-S Size (mm)
- Page 112 and 113: statistical difference from net plo
- Page 114 and 115: Pygospio elegans size distribution
- Page 116 and 117: used, approximately equivalent to t
- Page 118 and 119: artefacts associated with the metho
- Page 120 and 121: present in high numbers around sewa
- Page 122 and 123: lack, hydrogen sulphide-smelling se
- Page 124 and 125: CHAPTER 5 THE EFFECTS OF MACROALGAL
- Page 126 and 127: METHODS Survey design - During late
- Page 128 and 129: The sediments could not be sampled
- Page 130 and 131: RESULTS Species abundances - Table
- Page 132 and 133: 90 — 80 — "-e-' 70 — 60 — 4
- Page 134 and 135: 35 — *** 30 25 — 1.) = .-c‘l
- Page 136 and 137: Pygospio elegans size distributions
- Page 138 and 139: which is difficult to compare with
- Page 140 and 141: eason why some invertebrates showed
- Page 142 and 143: This study did not set out to expli
- Page 144 and 145: This reliance upon the early establ
- Page 146 and 147: CHAPTER 6 INITIAL COLONISATION OF D
- Page 148 and 149: esulting community at any stage of
- Page 150 and 151: ambient sediment had been removed.
- Page 152 and 153: emoved since they were the only tax
- Page 154 and 155: All statistics were performed using
- Page 156 and 157: RESULTS Univariate analysis of spec
- Page 158 and 159: 3.5 3 5 2 11 5 1 0.5 0 40 35 Ca 30
- Page 160 and 161: of non-patch areas (Figure 6.3(vi))
- Page 164 and 165: Multivariate analysis of community
- Page 166 and 167: Month Sample statistic (Global R) N
- Page 168 and 169: 2NP 3NP 4NP .•,, 6NP 5NP 6P 1NP i
- Page 170 and 171: Figure 6.8: Two-dimensional MDS ord
- Page 172 and 173: - - 5P ... 4P . 6P • .‘2NP 1NP
- Page 174 and 175: I 50. 1 60. 70. 80. 90. 100. BRAY-C
- Page 176 and 177: 'P2-AZ P3-AZ N2-AZ .- - - " .„ ..
- Page 178 and 179: o • o -o + 350 — 300 = 250 7 g
- Page 180 and 181: The importance of the ambient commu
- Page 182 and 183: In April, when P. elegans larval av
- Page 184 and 185: not only for errant polychaetes, bu
- Page 186 and 187: observed in this study. How crucial
- Page 188 and 189: Micro-scale spatial patterns of mac
- Page 190 and 191: METHODS Experimental design - A pre
- Page 192 and 193: study. These individuals would not
- Page 194 and 195: RESULTS Pilot survey - The pilot su
- Page 196 and 197: Transect survey - Micro-scale patte
- Page 198 and 199: Month v:m ratio pattern Id pattern
- Page 200 and 201: (i) March 1997, replicate 1 -iAlmiA
- Page 202 and 203: (xix) October 1997, replicate 1 (ra
- Page 204 and 205: The new recruits were only sufficie
- Page 206 and 207: The results of correlation analyses
- Page 208 and 209: cf.) . crt N ,—, Cr) C,1 ,—, Cr
- Page 210 and 211: 1.2 -0.4 "a 0.8 > (i) % Water conte
(i) APRIL<br />
X 2 goodness of fit K-S<br />
Size (mm) 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 >0.40 p-value p-value<br />
% Explained 3.27 9.11 22.30 14.83 50.41 0.802 >0.05<br />
(ii) AUGUST<br />
X 2 goodness of fit K-S<br />
Size (mm) 5_0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 p-value p-value<br />
% Explained 11.26 0.43 2.70 85.61 0.009 >0.05<br />
(iii) DECEMBER<br />
x2 goodness of fit K-S<br />
Size (mm)
Change language