18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

out concurrent with the faunal experiment on the 18th December. Six patch and six<br />

non-patch plots were chosen and defaunated sediments implanted into each in the<br />

same way as for the faunal experiments. After 3 weeks, 1 core (2.4cm internal<br />

diameter, 3cm deep) was taken from within each of the previously defaunated<br />

sediments from each of the 12 plots. These samples were frozen and then later<br />

analysed for water, organic and silt/clay contents. Redox potential values were<br />

measured at 1, 2 and 4cm depths within each azoic sample, using the technique<br />

described in Chapter 4. Water and organic contents were determined in an identical<br />

way as described in Chapter 2. It was not possible to carry out a full particle size<br />

distribution analysis on the sediments and, therefore, silt/clay fraction was determined<br />

for each sample by wet sieving on a 63).tm sieve. This method was compared with<br />

that used in Chapter 2 and although it produced higher % silt/clay fraction values it<br />

gave much more consistent results within replicates.<br />

Data analyses - The invertebrate data were analysed using both univariate and<br />

multivariate techniques. For the univariate analysis, only those species with a mean<br />

abundance of at least 2 for any plot type were regarded as sufficiently abundant for<br />

statistical analysis. The data were checked for normality using the Anderson-Darling<br />

test and homogeneity of variances by the Bartlett test. Any data not conforming to<br />

either of these two were transformed using an appropriate transformation (Zar, 1984).<br />

The transformed data were re-checked using the above tests, any data still not<br />

conforming to either test were analysed using an appropriate non-parametric test.<br />

Differences in means between azoic samples from patch plots and non-patch plots<br />

were otherwise assessed using Two-sample t-tests.<br />

The sizes of P. elegans (5th setiger width) and any other taxa with mean abundances<br />

20 per core in either plot type were measured. C. cap itata individuals were<br />

measured across their 3rd setiger (Ragnarsson, 1996). Size-frequency distributions<br />

were tested for difference between patch and non-patch azoics using the Kolmogorov-<br />

Smirnov (K-S) test and the X 2 goodness of fit test. The relative suitability of these,<br />

and the advantage of using the latter test, are given in Chapter 4.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!