18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

larvae (Santos and Simon, 1980a; Levin, 1984a; Strathmann, 1986), experiments have<br />

shown that small-scale patches of disturbed sediments are often initially dominated by<br />

species with benthic dispersal (Levin, 1984a; Savidge and Taghon, 1988; Frid, 1989;<br />

Smith and Brumsickle, 1989). However, the role of post-larval colonisation of<br />

disturbed sediments has also been shown to be important at both large and small<br />

scales (Dauer and Simon, 1976a; Thistle, 1981; Zajac and Whitlatch, 1982a; Levin,<br />

1984a; Frid, 1989; Smith and Brumsickle, 1989; Gunther, 1992; Thrush et al., 1992;<br />

Turner et al., 1997). Santos and Simon (1980b) suggested however that it is possible<br />

to incorrectly infer adult colonisation when sampling intervals are too long and/or<br />

sieve mesh sizes are too large to detect larval colonisation.<br />

Connell and Slatyer (1977) proposed four generalised models for community<br />

assembly during succession. These were the facilitation, inhibition, tolerance and the<br />

random colonisation models. Many studies have been performed to elucidate which<br />

of these predominate within marine soft-bottom environments (e.g., Woodin 1981;<br />

Gallagher et al., 1983; Whitlatch and Zajac, 1985; Trueblood, 1991) and in general,<br />

succession proceeds via a mixture of different kinds of interactions rather than one<br />

single model prevailing. Whitlatch and Zajac (1985), however, concluded that<br />

although biotic interactions between opportunistic organisms were important in<br />

controlling successional dynamics, the type of interaction ultimately depended upon<br />

the species present, their density and the habitat conditions. Dense aggregations of<br />

polychaetes' tubes have been shown to stabilise sediments by altering the<br />

characteristics of near-bed flow (Eckman et al., 1981) and have been shown to be<br />

particularly important in affecting the early stages of faunal succession (Levin, 1981,<br />

1982; Gallagher et al., 1983; Whitlatch and Zajac, 1985; Noji and Noji, 1991).<br />

Therefore, colonisation following disturbances within polychaete tube-beds are likely<br />

to have different successional dynamics compared with those outside tube-beds.<br />

Most studies investigating community establishment have followed species and<br />

community responses to disturbances which have occurred at only one point during<br />

the year and/or within only one type of habitat. However, since the colonisation<br />

potential of most species is predominantly governed by their larval availability at any<br />

one time (Bonsdorff and Osterman, 1984; Levin, 1984a; Ragnarsson, 1996), the<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!