18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(e.g., Nicholls et al., 1981; Soulsby et al., 1982), areas with a low weed biomass tend<br />

to support higher numbers of individuals due to presumably an increased food supply<br />

(this study). Furthermore, it seems that the physical presence of V. subsimplex had no<br />

detrimental effect on the species present.<br />

Unfortunately, previous surveys of this type have not recorded the redox potentials of<br />

the sediments under the weed mats. Although the V. subsimplex at Drum Sands<br />

rapidly caused the sediments below to become more reduced, it appears this was not<br />

severe enough to have had a significant deleterious effect on the species present. Hull<br />

(1987, 1988) reported much lower redox potentials in the sediments under his<br />

experimentally-implanted Enteromorpha spp. than those under the V. subsimplex mats<br />

in the present study. Although Perkins and Abbott (1972) did not measure redox<br />

potentials, they noted that C. edule were forced to migrate to the sediment surface by<br />

the reduced conditions just below the sediment surface in weed-covered areas; this<br />

was never observed at Drum Sands where their numbers actually increased.<br />

Some of the species which increased in numbers with weed cover in this study, e.g.,<br />

C. cap itata and oligochaetes (mainly tubificids), have been found to increase under<br />

both experimentally implanted and naturally occurring weed mats (Wharfe, 1977;<br />

Nicholls et al., 1981; Wiltse et al., 1981). These opportunists increase in numbers due<br />

to the increased food supply and their relative tolerance of reduced sediments.<br />

However, many species which have been shown to decrease in abundance under weed<br />

cover; spionids, bivalves and the amphipod C. volutator (Perkins and Abbott, 1972;<br />

Nicholls et al., 1981; Wiltse et al., 1981; Reise, 1983a) increased in numbers in the<br />

weed plots in this study. The increased abundances of these species in this study<br />

presumably resulted from the increased food supply and the more stable sediments<br />

afforded by the weed-covered areas, together with the fact that V. subsimplex, at least<br />

at the density observed, seemed to have no deleterious effect on the feeding<br />

mechanisms of most deposit-feeding invertebrates. The nudibranch Doto spp. was<br />

found only in the weed plots and in moderate abundance. Prescott (1970) suggested<br />

that Vaucheria spp. harbours its own faunal invertebrate species in marine intertidal<br />

benthic environments and proposed that nudibranchs utilise Vaucheria spp. as a food<br />

source.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!