Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

90 —
80 —
"-e-' 70 —
60 —
40—
-1§.30
'5
—
20 —
10 —
60
±). 50 —
r.14
40 —
o..) to
1,5 30-
0
0
20 —
=
10-
0
***
**
(i) 4 Weeks
• Non-weed plots
0 Weed plots
0
c.)
' -'
o
.7:1 ..E. C.) -o
=
0.) 0 V
ct
-c-z,
c
Li ..n o. a)
C/3 0 e co co
ra; 14 ..t
186.8
**
Nis
. 0 c,:s
cl ..- •
u
... ..a.
la%•t)
. ..
C-) Li ..0
Li
(ii) 20 Weeks
• Non-weed plots
0 Weed plots
..o
vi
**
.1`--1-1 I —II I .1.11-1 I I
co Cl ..r... ct .4
(1
=
4-.•
EI)
0
C.)
C..)
'Ztl
a)
0
C.)
3
. 0
-.=
C/i
0
O.)
0)
at
0 ..0
c.) c..)
0
0.:
t:ID
Figures 5.2(i-ii): Faunal results for the weed plots and the non-weed plots (±
S.E.Mean, n.6); (i) 4 weeks and (ii) 20 weeks after V. subsimplex mat establishment.
* Denotes a significant difference between the 2 plot types with p