18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

species was significantly affected. C. edule, M. balthica and A. mucosa showed non-<br />

significant changes in abundance between any of the plot types.<br />

Sediment water, organic and silt/clay contents and granulometry - The mean<br />

values for water content, organic content, silt/clay fraction, median phi and sorting<br />

coefficient for the sediments at the start of the experiment, after 6 weeks and after 20<br />

weeks are given in Figures 4.4(i-iii). At the start of the experiment there were no<br />

significant treatment differences for any of the sediment variables measured. Six<br />

weeks after the start of the experiment, the weed significantly increased the levels of<br />

all of the measured sediment variables (One-way ANOVA and Tukey test). The net<br />

plot was not found to be significantly different from the unmanipulated control for any<br />

of the variables measured suggesting that there were no significant artefacts associated<br />

with the plastic mesh for any of the measured sediment variables. This implies that<br />

the sediment accumulation observed within the net plots was probably natural and not<br />

due to the presence of the plastic mesh.<br />

After 20 weeks, there were no longer any significant differences in water content,<br />

organic content, silt/clay fraction, median phi and sorting coefficient between the<br />

weed treatment and net plots. This suggests that the effects of the weed on the<br />

sediment variables were short-lived, i.e., as soon as the weed started to disappear the<br />

sediments began to return to ambient conditions.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!