18.08.2013 Views

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

Download (20MB) - Repository@Napier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40m<br />

LOW WEED COVER (10-25%)<br />

0 0<br />

El 0<br />

HIGH WEED COVER El<br />

(40-50%)<br />

0 • CI 0 o<br />

NO WEED COVER<br />

ci El El 0 o o o o o<br />

14 AREA OF WEED IMPLANTATION<br />

EXPERIMENT<br />

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Figure 4.1: Diagram showing the location of the experimental blocks and the extent<br />

of natural weed mat establishment during the summer 1996. 40m intervals shows<br />

sample sites from 40m survey (see Chapter 2).<br />

Algae for the experiment were collected from Dalgety Bay, on the north coast of the<br />

Firth of Forth, approximately 3 miles (straight line distance) from Drum Sands. The<br />

algae (Enteromorpha prolifera) were washed thoroughly in seawater on collection to<br />

remove associated fauna. The algae were later examined for fauna, very few<br />

invertebrates remained and only Hydrobia ulvae remained in sufficiently high<br />

numbers (more than 1 individual per lkg wet biomass of weed) to necessitate omitting<br />

this species from later analysis. Since H. ulvae were not very abundant, it was<br />

assumed that any between treatment differences observed were not due to differences<br />

in H. ulvae densities.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!