18.08.2013 Views

THESIS

THESIS

THESIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

understand a food's effect on blood sugar (Jenkins et al. 2002). The carbohydrate in<br />

watermelon, for example, has a high GI but there isn't a lot of it, so watermelon's<br />

glycemic load is relatively low. A GL of 20 or more is high, a GL of 11 to 19<br />

inclusive is medium, and a GL of 10 or less is low Foster et al. 2002).<br />

6.2.3 Relationships between glycemic index and glycemic load<br />

Foods that have a low GL almost always have a low GI food with an<br />

intermediate or high GL range from very low to very high GI. Both GI and GL in<br />

cake products are listed in Table 12. The GI is of foods based on white bread, where it<br />

is set to equal 100. The other is the glycemic load, which is calculated from the<br />

glycemic index divided by 100 multiplied by its available carbohydrate content (i.e.<br />

carbohydrates minus fiber) in grams.<br />

Table 12 Glycemic index and glycemic load representative in cakes.<br />

Cake types GI (bread<br />

= 100)<br />

Glycemic<br />

Load<br />

Avail. Carb<br />

per serving<br />

Serving Size<br />

(grams)<br />

Angel food cake 95 ± 70 27.55 29 50<br />

Banana cake 67 ± 80 25.46 38 80<br />

Chocolate cake 79 ± 10 41.08 52 111<br />

Cupcake, strawberry-iced 104 ± 12 29.12 28 53<br />

Pound butter cake 73 ± 12 18.98 26 38<br />

Sponge cake, plain 66 ± 60 23.76 36 63<br />

Pound cake (Sara Lee) 77 ± 80 21.56 28 53<br />

Source: Jenkins et al. (2002a)<br />

6.3 Low glycemic index butter cake<br />

The food industry is being challenged to redesign traditional foods for<br />

optimal nutritional value, in response to some population sectors with particular<br />

nutritional necessities and making them as tasty as or better than the original. One<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!