THESIS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kim, E.J., Tanhehco and P.K.W. Ng. 2006. Effect of extrusion conditions on resistant starch formation from pastry wheat flour. Food Chem. 99: 718-723. ______, B.P. Mullan, D.J. Hampson and J.R. Pluske. 2006. Effects of amylose content, autoclaving, parboiling, extrusion, and postcooking treatments on resistant starch content of different rice cultivars. Aust. J. Agri. Res. 57: 1291–1296. King. J. M. and S.Y. Tan. 2005. Determination resistant rice starch in different ways, cooked as brown or white, boiled or steam. Louisiana State University. Available Source: http://www. ricecrc,org/ reader/program_3_4.htm, March 03, 2005. Krueger, B.R., Walker, CE., Knutson, C.A., and Inglett, G.E., 1987a. Differential scanning calorimetry of raw and annealed starch from normal and mutant maize genotypes. Cereal Chem. 54:187- 196. _____, _____, _____, and _____. 1987b. A differential scanning calorimetry study on the effect of annealing on gelatinization behavior of corn starch. J. Food Sci. 52: 178–187. Lai, K.P., J.F. Steffe and P.K.W. Ng. 2000. Average shear rates in the rapid visco analyzer (RVA) mixing system. Cereal Chem. 77(6): 714-716. Lang, N.M., L.K. Evans, B.A. Swan, and R.A.S. Phillips. 2004. Building a critical mass: The Penn Macy initiative. In L. K. Evans, and N. M. Lang (Eds.), Academic Nursing Practice: Helping to Shape the Future of Health Care. (258-265). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. Lawless, H.T. and H. Heymann. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. International Thomson Publishing, New York. 819p. 175
Lavin, M., E. Eshbaugh, J.-M. Hu, S. Mathews, and R. A. Sharrock. 1998. Monophyletic subgroups of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) as revealed by phytochrome nucleotide sequence data. Am. J. Botany. 85: 412-433. Lee, C. C., R.C. Hoseney, and E. Varriona-Marstson. 1985. Determination of cake volume. Cereal Chem. 59: 389 – 392. Leeds, A. R. 2002. Glycemic index and heart disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76(1): 286S-289S. Leloup, V. M., P. Colonna and S.G. Ring. 1993. α-Amylase adsorption on starch crystallites. Biotechn. Bioeng. 38:127–134. Lengton, J., and G. A. LeGrays, 1981. Differential scanning calorimetry studies on The crystallinity of ageing wheat gels. Starch/stärke, 33: 410-314. Levine, H. and L. Slade 1986. A polymer physicochemical approach to the study of commercial starch hydrolysis products (SHPs). Carbohydr. Polym. 6: 213- 244. Lim, S.T., Kasemsuwan, T., and Jane, J. 1994. Characterization of phosphorus in starch by 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cereal Chem. 71: 488–508. ______, Chang and H.J. Chung. 2001. Thermal transition characteristics of heat moisture treated corn and potato starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 46: 107 – 115. Lin, P., Z. Czuchajowska, and Y. Pomeranz. 1994. Enzyme-resistant starch in yellow layer cake. Cereal Chem. 71: 69-78. Lineback, D.R. 1984. The starch granule: Organization and properties. Bakers Dig. 58: 16-21. 176
Page 1:
THESIS ENZYME-RESISTANT STARCH TYPE
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Classif
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Table Pa
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Appendi
Page 15 and 16:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued) R
Page 17 and 18:
een used to produce a sample with l
Page 19 and 20:
Overall objectives: OBJECTIVES 1. T
Page 21 and 22:
However, it was discovered that a r
Page 23 and 24:
Cassidy et al. (1994), in an intern
Page 25 and 26:
fed both the 45 and 63g/100g rice s
Page 27 and 28:
only about 3 g. The physiological b
Page 29 and 30:
(Brown et al. 1995). This product,
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 1 A detailed structure of th
Page 33 and 34:
2.3 Chemical composition of rice st
Page 35 and 36:
helix with only the ring oxygen poi
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 5 Idealized diagram of the c
Page 39 and 40:
2.5 Rice starch gelatinization Gela
Page 41 and 42:
in excess water. The loss of birefr
Page 43 and 44:
morphological changes occurring at
Page 45 and 46:
amylose is the linear fraction of s
Page 47 and 48:
units are known to inhibit retrogra
Page 49 and 50:
(-1 to 43 o C) on concentrated star
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 10 Schematic diagram showing
Page 53 and 54:
ice due to the various cooking and
Page 55 and 56:
Recently, there has been a flurry o
Page 57 and 58:
3.1 Processing condition on improve
Page 59 and 60:
of RS overall, 60%, among the three
Page 61 and 62:
chains but liberates longer chains
Page 63 and 64:
4.1 Amylolytic enzymes Three groups
Page 65 and 66:
Structure and properties of β- amy
Page 67 and 68:
Structure and properties: The pullu
Page 69 and 70:
Action pattern: The amyloglucosidas
Page 71 and 72:
methods, for instance in scanning e
Page 73 and 74:
6. Low glycemic butter cake product
Page 75 and 76:
Sugar increases cake volume by decr
Page 77 and 78:
cereals, and baked potatoes. Low gl
Page 79 and 80:
way to achieve a healthy food produ
Page 81 and 82:
complexes. In the meantime, and inv
Page 83 and 84:
would be only 2. In comparison, the
Page 85 and 86:
ecause of an absolute decrease in t
Page 87 and 88:
enhanced fat oxidation at the expen
Page 89 and 90:
1. Raw Materials MATERIALS AND METH
Page 91 and 92:
Methods 1. Production of resistant
Page 93 and 94:
1.2.3 Degree of syneresis Degree of
Page 95 and 96:
1.2.9 Starch hydrolysis rate and es
Page 97 and 98:
1.3.3 Resistant starch content, sta
Page 99 and 100:
2.1.1 Cake sample preparation Cake
Page 101 and 102:
Nevertheless, the former refers to
Page 103 and 104:
3. Experimental Design and Statisti
Page 105 and 106:
essentially linear polymer of α-(1
Page 107 and 108:
hydrolysis of the rice starch prehe
Page 109 and 110:
a) b) Figure 15 Scanning electron m
Page 111 and 112:
amylose content of starch had a har
Page 113 and 114:
Degree of syneresis (%) 70.0 60.0 5
Page 115 and 116:
1.2.7 Physicochemical properties of
Page 117 and 118:
1.2.8 In vitro starch digestibility
Page 119 and 120:
1.2.9 Hydrolysis index and glycemic
Page 121 and 122:
Table 16 Effect of preheated treatm
Page 123 and 124:
1.2.10 Crystallinity of RS III 108
Page 125 and 126:
Figure 22 X-ray diffraction pattern
Page 127 and 128:
content. The high correlation facto
Page 129 and 130:
1.3.2 β-amylolysis (%) 114 β-amyl
Page 131 and 132:
1.3.4 In vitro starch digestibility
Page 133 and 134:
118 Non significant differences (P
Page 135 and 136:
1.4.2 Degree of hydrolysis 120 The
Page 137 and 138:
2 An application of resistant starc
Page 139 and 140: sucrose or maltose are reducing suc
Page 141 and 142: 126 The different effect of HFCS on
Page 143 and 144: 2.1.2 Sensory evaluation of HFCS re
Page 145 and 146: and objective percent moisture gene
Page 147 and 148: 132 In the dietetic cake mix of Cor
Page 149 and 150: 3) In vitro starch digestibility 13
Page 151 and 152: Table 23 Percentage (dwb) of starch
Page 153 and 154: al. (2006) reported that when gluco
Page 155 and 156: 140 volume, crust and crumb color o
Page 157 and 158: (P
Page 159 and 160: 2.2.2 Sensory evaluation of RS III
Page 161 and 162: 3) Flavor score 146 Flavor is the m
Page 163 and 164: 2.2.3 Chemical composition of RS II
Page 165 and 166: Table 27 Mean values for chemical c
Page 167 and 168: Table 28 Percentage (dwb) of starch
Page 169 and 170: cake is lower in these samples than
Page 171 and 172: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 156
Page 173 and 174: 158 syneresis of retrograded starch
Page 175 and 176: LITERATURE CITED Abe, J.I., K. Naka
Page 177 and 178: Biliaderis, C.G. and J. Zawastowski
Page 179 and 180: Cheng, H.H. and M.H. Lai. 2000. Fer
Page 181 and 182: Elgun, A. Z. Ertugay, M. Certel, an
Page 183 and 184: Fitt L.E. and E.M. Snyder. 1984. Ph
Page 185 and 186: Grandfeldt, A., C. Eliasson and I.
Page 187 and 188: Hoseney, R.C. 1990. Principles of C
Page 189: Juliano, B.O. and M.S. Goddard. 198
Page 193 and 194: Ludwig, D.S. and R.H. Eckel. 2002.
Page 195 and 196: Meilgaard, M., Civille, O.V., and C
Page 197 and 198: Nakazawa, F., S. Noguchi, J.Takahas
Page 199 and 200: Piyarat, N. 2003. The assessment of
Page 201 and 202: Schoch, T. J. 1969. Non-carbohydrat
Page 203 and 204: Srinivasa Rao, P. 1970. Studies on
Page 205 and 206: Towar, J., C. Melito, E. Herrera, A
Page 207 and 208: Yuan, R.C. and D.B. Thompson. 1998.
Page 209 and 210: Appendix A Chemical analysis proced
Page 211 and 212: 2.2 Method determination 196 Total
Page 213 and 214: source and detach the extractor and
Page 215 and 216: 5.3 Procedure for Preparation for S
Page 217 and 218: 1) Standard curve procedure 202 Usi
Page 219 and 220: 7. Reducing sugar determination by
Page 221 and 222: 8. Resistant starch determination b
Page 223 and 224: 8.2.3 Measurement of resistant star
Page 225 and 226: lank. starch. 210 3. Measure the ab
Page 227 and 228: Appendix B Physical analysis proced
Page 229 and 230: 2. X Ray Diffraction Measurement 2.
Page 231 and 232: Appendix C Picture of some experime
Page 233 and 234: Heated debranched samples Cooled de
Page 235 and 236: Appendix Figure C4 Visuals appearan
Page 237 and 238: 1. Introduction 222 There are sever
Page 239 and 240: Appendix E Experimental data 224
Page 241 and 242:
Appendix Table E3 X-ray diffraction
Page 243 and 244:
Appendix F List of publications 228
Page 245 and 246:
230
Page 247 and 248:
232
Page 249 and 250:
234
Page 251 and 252:
236
Page 253 and 254:
238
Page 255 and 256:
240
Page 257 and 258:
242
Page 259 and 260:
244
Page 261 and 262:
246
Page 263:
NAME : Miss Jirapa Pongjanta BIRTH
show all

THESIS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?