THESIS
THESIS
THESIS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3) Flavor score<br />
146<br />
Flavor is the most important factor consumers consider when<br />
shopping for food (Bruhn et al. 1992). Flavor sensations are produced when salty,<br />
sweet, sour, or bitter substances dissolved in solution are detected by the taste buds,<br />
while<br />
aroma or odor is smell detected by the nose receptors. Panelists measured the<br />
perception of sweetness and aroma are presented<br />
in the following section.<br />
a) Sweetness score<br />
The preference for sweet foods develops at an early age.<br />
However, the perception of sweetness varies individually, due to genetics,<br />
concentration of the sweetener, temperature, viscosity, and pH (Bennion, 1995). In<br />
general, research has shown that individuals have a low sensitivity for sucrose<br />
(Meilgaard et al. 1991b). Non-significant differences (P≥0.05) for sweetness were<br />
found among butter cake treatments (Table 26). A change in the degree of sweetness<br />
was perceived in butter cakes with greatest in 20% cake flour replacement. That is, a<br />
control treatment was less like on sweetness (6.40) than the other treatments.<br />
However, cake formulations that contained RS III was slightly sweeter than control<br />
(100% cake flour). Overall, 5% through 20% RS III replacement for cake flour were<br />
perceived as moderately like on sweetness taste. However, sweetness scores<br />
for all<br />
treatments<br />
were rated as being bland (6.40 to 6.96). It appears that RS III is tasteless,<br />
has no satiating effect and acts as a mild<br />
laxative (Rössler et al., 2002).<br />
b)<br />
Aroma score<br />
Non-significant differences (P≥0.05) for aroma score were<br />
found among five butter cake treatments (Table 26). Panelist gave a score for butter<br />
cake prepared from 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% RS III replacement for cake flour were 5.86,<br />
5.66, 6.60, 6.70 and 6.06, respectively. It had a typical<br />
RS III aroma without sour,<br />
musty, or other objectionable odors. The flavor was bland and was of typical rice<br />
flavor with no rancid or off flavors (Anonymous, 2003).