18.08.2013 Views

THESIS

THESIS

THESIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

production. This could be due to the pullulanase enzyme hydrolyzed α-1,6-glucosidic<br />

111<br />

bonds,<br />

releasing a linear polymers linked by α-1,4-glucosidic bonds. These fragments<br />

are<br />

rapidly producing retrograded indigestible starch. An application of freeze-thaw<br />

process<br />

(syneresis) on retrograded gel results in the continuous reassociation and<br />

eventual<br />

recrystallization of the gel, a process that excludes water from the gel phase<br />

(Thomas<br />

and Atwell, 1999; Towar et al. 2002). Present data show that gels of higher<br />

degree<br />

of syneresis, developed significantly higher resistant starch content (Figure 24;<br />

). A positive correlation between the degree of syneresis vs dehydration rate (R 2<br />

B<br />

0.9634) of the RS III from pullulanase debranching of 121 o =<br />

C were also observed.<br />

Figure 23 Correlation between degree of debranching vs resistant starch content (A)<br />

and degree of syneresis vs resistant starch content (B) relation in RS III<br />

from 0- 48 hr debranching of<br />

121°C preheated HARS<br />

2) Percentage of crystallinity and resistant starch content correlation<br />

The calculated crystallinities show strong correlation with resistant<br />

starch<br />

content (Figure 24).The degree of crystallinity being same proportional to the<br />

resistant<br />

starch content. RS III from highly resistant starch content (19.32 %) had the<br />

highest<br />

crystallinity (19.50 %), while RS III with lower resistant starch content (had<br />

the<br />

lowest value (2.58%). Figure 24 is a plot of crystallinity vs. resistant starch

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!