18.08.2013 Views

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4 • Nicola Mai<br />

developed area that has drained money from the Yugoslav State, the<br />

Serbian IDPs from Kosovo were considered privileged. According to<br />

many Serbs from Serbia, those arriving from Kosovo were not entitled to<br />

humanitarian aid any more than any other citizen of the FRY. A third<br />

reason for the difficult situation in which the Kosovar Serbs found themselves<br />

was that their culture and identity had evolved differently from that<br />

of the Serbs in Serbia. Most of the Kosovar Serbs, like their Albanian<br />

counterparts, had lived and worked in a rural environment, as members of<br />

large, patriarchal families. Their values were consistent with their social,<br />

economic and cultural horizon of daily experience. The Kosovar Serbs<br />

were perceived as “backwards” by the more modernized population of<br />

Yugoslavia. They were subject to discrimination and stigmatization in<br />

Serbia proper, often being called Shiptars, (a derogatory term used for<br />

Albanians), which, paradoxically, associated them with their Kosovar<br />

“enemies” and differentiated them from other Serbs.<br />

At the time we collected our interviews, most of these Kosovar Serbian<br />

families were undergoing the process of resettlement alone, relying on<br />

their own resources, (apart from the very basic humanitarian aid provided<br />

by the UNHCR, OXFAM, and especially the Yugoslav Red Cross, these<br />

being the only organizations authorized to distribute aid at the time). While<br />

richer families had been able to rent homes on their own, those who could<br />

not afford this found themselves in extremely precarious situations. Most<br />

found shelter in provisionally organized collective centres, which were<br />

usually set up in abandoned schools or buildings that had once belonged<br />

to the state. Often, these shelters were situated in the outskirts of the main<br />

urban centres, in Belgrade, Kraljevo, Kragujevac, Leskovac and Vranje, as<br />

well as in Novi Sad.<br />

The areas we identified as most suitable for the interviewing process were<br />

Novi Sad (Vojvodina), Belgrade, Kraljevo, and Kragujevac in central<br />

Serbia, and Leskovac in Southern Serbia. These last three cities, because<br />

of their proximity to Kosovo, had received the largest influx of IDPs.<br />

These areas were selected mainly because of the significant presence of<br />

Kosovar IDPs, but they were also found suitable to the purposes of the<br />

project because of the regional differences between Southern Serbia<br />

(Leskovac), Central Serbia (Kraljevo and Kragujevac), Belgrade, and<br />

Vojvodina (Novi Sad). On the basis of the number of working areas and of<br />

refugees, we decided to train and hire six interviewers: two for the<br />

Belgrade area, one for the Novi Sad Area, two for the Kraljevo and<br />

Kragujevac area, and one for the Leskovac area. Altogether, the interviewers<br />

collected more than 120 interviews, among which 40 have been<br />

selected for translation.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!