18.08.2013 Views

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1 • Silvia Salvatici<br />

She seemed confused by the coexistence of new ways of living and old<br />

values, a situation further complicated by a rapid rhythm of transformation<br />

that did not allow the women’s experiences to enter the realm of public<br />

awareness.<br />

Past, present and identities<br />

The construction of memory and the depiction of the present seem to be<br />

processes that follow different paths. On one hand, the two converge in a<br />

collective voice mainly addressed toward the international community,<br />

one that would intend to assert itself as the single expression of a national<br />

identity that is monolithic, solid, rooted in tradition and forged by the long<br />

lasting conflict. The basic components of this identity were characterized<br />

as suffering, (which, of course, is made no less real by its role in the construction<br />

of a collective identity), and self-pity. Both of these characteristics<br />

are typical of nationalistic discourses in the Balkan region, as studies<br />

of the area have shown. 20 According to this perspective, memories of<br />

past hardship and descriptions of present struggles are all considered<br />

attributable to a cause that concerns the entire community, a collective<br />

concern. Suffering, pain and struggle are elevated from private, individual<br />

spheres to the public one, and the result is one of reassurance and support.<br />

Psychological suffering thus becomes a constituent part of this self-pitying<br />

auto-representation, and claims lineage from the “trauma” produced by the<br />

war and its consequences. This collective discourse, however, fails to recognize<br />

the individual paths, the variety of family and social contexts, the<br />

specificity of an individual’s needs. The collective voice tends to deny differences<br />

within itself, in order to project an image of inner cohesion and<br />

homogeneity, worthy of functioning by itself, in contrast with outside<br />

communities.<br />

On the other hand, the accounts also revealed different memories of the<br />

past and varied perceptions of the present, reflecting the complexity of a<br />

situation: the conflict produced and still generates grief and anguish, but it<br />

had and still has other effects as well, such as unknown spaces of autonomy,<br />

conflicts between different realities (some that involve the tension<br />

of belonging to a specific community), and the experience of new<br />

resources. A plurality of voices has emerged along the boundaries marked<br />

by individual experiences, as well as those created by gender, generational<br />

and social-cultural divides. Such boundaries have grown even within the<br />

limits of a national community. These multiple voices express the research<br />

on new balances and on the rise of contradictions, lacerations and fractures<br />

produced by the experience of the war and by the rapid transformation of<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!