18.08.2013 Views

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 • Giuseppe De Sario, Laura Corradi, Patricia Ruiz, Enrica Capussotti<br />

Part IV<br />

Memory: a Complex Battlefield<br />

Enrica Capussotti*<br />

Prologue<br />

The circulation between self-identification and the “external” gaze is one<br />

of the mechanisms integral to the construction of identity. In discussing<br />

memories and history, I have had to take into consideration the ways in<br />

which the interviewees presented themselves as either Kosovar Albanians<br />

or Kosovar Romany. This is a problematic point: while the sense of<br />

belonging to two different groups is often stressed during the narration,<br />

these boundaries quite often blur when the interviewees speak of languages,<br />

religions and geographic locations shared by individuals. I feel<br />

almost paralysed by the implications of the material and its analysis. In the<br />

countries that were once part of Yugoslavia, the conflicts occurred when<br />

constructed identities became “natural”, with terrible consequences for<br />

millions of people. New boundaries were and are built and previous<br />

“boundary crossings” are prevented, all in the name of historical differences.<br />

The fabrication of “one” past has played a vital role in justifying<br />

agendas based on “authentic” national roots. My worry here concerns my<br />

position as a researcher: how can I avoid returning a gaze which confirms<br />

the “selves”, their representation as members of distinctive groups, when<br />

the corollaries to this distinction are intolerance and aggression, expressed<br />

towards an “other”? How can I use a category such as “difference”, which<br />

has been such an important tool in the political agenda of radical movements<br />

in the 1960s and 1970s, without sinking into the marshy terrain of<br />

“identity politics”? Since we know that “ethnicity” is a construction created<br />

to serve specific political interests, could its alternative not be to cease<br />

invoking it by name?<br />

These concerns are not just mine, but are shared by many scholars. As<br />

Hermann Bausinger pointed out:<br />

194<br />

…ethnic cleansing has been a matter of power, interests and violence and<br />

not a pre-established national and natural order. People had to be ethni-<br />

* Ph.D. in Cultural History from the European University Institute (Florence), now research<br />

fellow at the Gender Programme of the Robert Schuman Centre, EUI.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!