18.08.2013 Views

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The transgressor<br />

Although this figure is part of the typology proposed by Enriquez and<br />

which was then “adapted” to situations of humanitarian intervention, it<br />

doesn’t seem to me that this model, at least in the case of Kosovo, was<br />

present in a significant manner. I will, however, describe it briefly so as to<br />

offer a comparison to the reader. The fundamental calling of this model is to<br />

favour the emergence of spontaneity, festiveness and protest of institutions.<br />

In a humanitarian context, this model “expresses a sort of megalomania of<br />

being the father, the parent that generates the unknown and promulgates<br />

transgression and generalized instability” (Enriquez, 1980: 126-127).<br />

The destroyer<br />

<strong>Psychosocial</strong> <strong>Notebook</strong>, Volume 2, October 2001<br />

The destroyer model functions at an essentially unconscious level, in a<br />

kind of interpersonal interaction that tends to encourage or favour a conflict<br />

of affections in the other. According to Enriquez, who refers to Searles<br />

(Searles, 1978), “This kind of desire is present in every affectionately<br />

healthy individual,” and therefore comes into play in every therapeutic or<br />

training relationship. I will add that in a therapeutic relationship, as is often<br />

imagined by humanitarian workers, their perceived function as “helper of<br />

‘unfortunate peoples’ ” and their desire to heal the other, might be reactive<br />

training: a defence mechanism responding to the desire to make the other<br />

ill. The desire to form can be affected or induced by the opposite desire to<br />

de-form, break, and shatter the other.<br />

After all, how could a humanitarian avoid the risk of this contradiction?<br />

His position is such that he could, on one hand, give his group of “assisted<br />

people” an incentive for autonomy and encouragement to search for<br />

their own resources, but he could also refer back to their own closed interpretive<br />

system, leaving them with a situation of interpretive regression and<br />

dependency.<br />

With this brief and concise review, I intended to indicate that every trainer<br />

(and the humanitarian worker often refers to this figure for guidance)<br />

will or is possessed by one or more of these ghosts. He must recognize<br />

them and question himself about their impacts, on himself and on others,<br />

if he does not wish, by offering his services as “rescuer”, to transform his<br />

intervention into a dangerous situation that perpetuates violence.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!