Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...
Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...
Psychosocial Notebook - IOM Publications - International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Psychosocial</strong> <strong>Notebook</strong>, Volume 2, October 2001<br />
nation. Others still could not make any sense of the events. In analysing<br />
the life histories of Serb IDPs, it might be interesting to observe how<br />
meaning is culturally constructed, by identifying and analysing the “narrative<br />
resources” used to sustain this meaning.<br />
Throughout the interviews, the two narratives most often used to give<br />
meaning to events were those of victimization and conspiracy. Both of<br />
these discursive sets are consistent with a narcissistic psychological and<br />
social order, characterized by the tendency to reject issues of personal<br />
responsibility outwards.<br />
Narratives of antagonism and victimization:<br />
“Look what they did to us…”<br />
Throughout the project, narratives of self-victimization and malevolent<br />
conspiracy recurred in the interviews collected. While many events and<br />
dynamics were reported or confirmed by the major international organizations/institutions<br />
operating in Kosovo and rump Yugoslavia, it should be<br />
made clear that it is beyond the purpose of the present essay to confirm or<br />
refute the veracity of any of these assertions (a sample of which is<br />
presented below). More relevant here, are the psychological and social<br />
implications of the fact that these explanations are experienced as if they<br />
were both meaningful and true. Our aim here is thus simply to identify and<br />
analyse the psychological and social implications embedded in this construct<br />
of meaning and truth.<br />
The following self-victimizing narratives recurred in the interviewees’<br />
descriptions of the situation in Kosovo before 1998. These were identified<br />
through a qualitative discursive analysis of the interview transcriptions:<br />
• Discrimination in the workplace: the Albanians were granted extra<br />
privileges in the public sector;<br />
• Albanians held a monopoly over the private and informal economy;<br />
• Discrimination in restricted access to public services: Albanian civil<br />
servants had the authority to either grant or bar access or assistance;<br />
• Albanians often enjoyed higher economic status, due to remittances sent<br />
by friends, kin, or other migrants living abroad;<br />
• Albanians refused to learn Serbian while the Serbs had to learn Albanian;<br />
• Albanians never really abandoned the notion of a Greater Albania;<br />
• Albanians had better access to education;<br />
• “Albanians were always richer than us.”<br />
101