18.08.2013 Views

Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy

Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy

Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Section-300<br />

(b) Carry out an insitu density test each at the following two locations:<br />

(i) close to the edge of the roadway<br />

(ii) any location selected at random<br />

(c) If at location (i), the insitu density is lower than the lower specified limit, it goes to show that<br />

proper precautions in regard to trimming at the verges were not taken by building the<br />

embankment initially wider than the design embankment and then trimming at the edges.<br />

(d) At location (ii), the insitu density test result should not be lower than the lower specified<br />

limit. If the actual insitu density obtained at the time of checking is lower than the lower<br />

specified limit, check on the action taken to rectify the defect and if any Non-Con<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Report was filled up.<br />

(e) Check, if the improved subgrade was compacted to 100% Proctor density.<br />

(f) Check, if the improved subgrade just after compaction was properly cured <strong>for</strong> 7 days with<br />

wet gunny bags, moist straw or sand, periodically sprinkled with water.<br />

3. Side Slopes and Profile<br />

(a) Simple gadgets <strong>for</strong> estimating the side slopes from the horizontal distance (horizontality<br />

ensured by a spirit level) and vertical height of a T or L frame (Appendix 1, Para 1.8) can be<br />

used <strong>for</strong> monitoring the actual side slopes of a completed embankment.<br />

(b) A set of 3 observations can be expeditiously taken per km length, using such gadgets.<br />

4. Stability and Workmanship of Cut Slopes<br />

(in case of hilly/ rolling terrain)<br />

(a) As per the design requirements of Cut Slopes, check if all the needed measures have been<br />

taken <strong>for</strong> erosion control (by providing suitable species of vegetation), drainage (catch water<br />

drains etc) and retaining structures like breast walls/ retaining walls etc.<br />

(b) Check on the actual slope(s) provided; extent and type of vegetation provided; the crosssection,<br />

lining and gradients of drains provided; dimensions adopted and materials used in<br />

retaining structures, to see if they all meet the design requirements.<br />

5. Adequacy of Slope Protection (in case of high embankments/ hilly/ rolling terrain)<br />

(a) Check, using the simple gadgets described earlier, if the actual slopes provided are indeed<br />

within permissible tolerances of the design slopes.<br />

(b) In order to avoid any rain cuts along the slopes, check if the type of vegetation provided <strong>for</strong><br />

erosion control is of the right species and that wherever required, top soil was indeed<br />

provided on completed embankment slopes be<strong>for</strong>e planting vegetation. If not, the deficiencies<br />

should be pointed out.<br />

(c) Check, if any design requirements like provision of stone pitching or gabions etc. are<br />

implemented satisfactorily by examining the quality of stone pitching (e.g if the drainage<br />

layer underneath has indeed been provided and the size and quality of stones meet the<br />

specified requirements) and in case of gabions, the wire mesh of the crate is plastic coated<br />

etc.<br />

(d) Check, if the drainage system provided is as per the design requirements. Any deficiencies<br />

observed should be brought out.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!