Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy
Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy
Quality Assurance Handbook for Rural Roads Volume-I - pmgsy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. Section-300<br />
(b) Carry out an insitu density test each at the following two locations:<br />
(i) close to the edge of the roadway<br />
(ii) any location selected at random<br />
(c) If at location (i), the insitu density is lower than the lower specified limit, it goes to show that<br />
proper precautions in regard to trimming at the verges were not taken by building the<br />
embankment initially wider than the design embankment and then trimming at the edges.<br />
(d) At location (ii), the insitu density test result should not be lower than the lower specified<br />
limit. If the actual insitu density obtained at the time of checking is lower than the lower<br />
specified limit, check on the action taken to rectify the defect and if any Non-Con<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
Report was filled up.<br />
(e) Check, if the improved subgrade was compacted to 100% Proctor density.<br />
(f) Check, if the improved subgrade just after compaction was properly cured <strong>for</strong> 7 days with<br />
wet gunny bags, moist straw or sand, periodically sprinkled with water.<br />
3. Side Slopes and Profile<br />
(a) Simple gadgets <strong>for</strong> estimating the side slopes from the horizontal distance (horizontality<br />
ensured by a spirit level) and vertical height of a T or L frame (Appendix 1, Para 1.8) can be<br />
used <strong>for</strong> monitoring the actual side slopes of a completed embankment.<br />
(b) A set of 3 observations can be expeditiously taken per km length, using such gadgets.<br />
4. Stability and Workmanship of Cut Slopes<br />
(in case of hilly/ rolling terrain)<br />
(a) As per the design requirements of Cut Slopes, check if all the needed measures have been<br />
taken <strong>for</strong> erosion control (by providing suitable species of vegetation), drainage (catch water<br />
drains etc) and retaining structures like breast walls/ retaining walls etc.<br />
(b) Check on the actual slope(s) provided; extent and type of vegetation provided; the crosssection,<br />
lining and gradients of drains provided; dimensions adopted and materials used in<br />
retaining structures, to see if they all meet the design requirements.<br />
5. Adequacy of Slope Protection (in case of high embankments/ hilly/ rolling terrain)<br />
(a) Check, using the simple gadgets described earlier, if the actual slopes provided are indeed<br />
within permissible tolerances of the design slopes.<br />
(b) In order to avoid any rain cuts along the slopes, check if the type of vegetation provided <strong>for</strong><br />
erosion control is of the right species and that wherever required, top soil was indeed<br />
provided on completed embankment slopes be<strong>for</strong>e planting vegetation. If not, the deficiencies<br />
should be pointed out.<br />
(c) Check, if any design requirements like provision of stone pitching or gabions etc. are<br />
implemented satisfactorily by examining the quality of stone pitching (e.g if the drainage<br />
layer underneath has indeed been provided and the size and quality of stones meet the<br />
specified requirements) and in case of gabions, the wire mesh of the crate is plastic coated<br />
etc.<br />
(d) Check, if the drainage system provided is as per the design requirements. Any deficiencies<br />
observed should be brought out.<br />
254