18.08.2013 Views

Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy

Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy

Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30<br />

Apart from the above, both faces of Rat Trap Bonded<br />

Brick wall are checked with plumb bob, so both the<br />

faces are uniform. As a result there is no necessity to<br />

provide plastering. All that would be required is neat<br />

cement pointing and patching on one edge of the<br />

header course. Hence there will be additional savings in<br />

plastering.<br />

On completion of construction and curing the back<br />

filling was done with, in layers by local earth of<br />

Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.70 gms./cc. Then an<br />

earth compactor was employed to roll and compact the<br />

retained earth. The compactor was directed to start<br />

rolling from about 1 m away from the retaining wall and<br />

it came slowly towards the folded wall and went on<br />

rolling moving over the corbelled shelves with full<br />

capacity of vibration, which is equivalent to 36 M.T.<br />

Observations<br />

Through the wall was expected to fail severely, it did<br />

not. The stretches where the relieving shelves were not<br />

in existence, after repetition of about 3-4 cycles of full<br />

vibration rolling the vertical joint at the junction of fold<br />

on the pond side showed a line of crack which<br />

propagated along the line of weakness of brick masonry.<br />

The maximum width of crack was about 35 mm and it<br />

appeared at about 7250 mm from GL i.e. at about at ½ of<br />

height from GL. This clearly signifies that the failure was<br />

due to intensity of rolling load to this enormous extent.<br />

Not by virtue of back filling. The entire operation was<br />

<strong>Grameen</strong> <strong>Sampark</strong><br />

video recorded. A selected portion of video recording is<br />

attached with a soft copy of this document.<br />

Progress of Field Tests<br />

A good number of folded plates were then applied to<br />

different locations of different projects as a cost effective<br />

tool for different height of retentions also. All are<br />

performing satisfactory till date. Some photographs are<br />

attached.<br />

In one instance folded plate has been applied to act as a<br />

guide bank beside a rivulet, which converges and<br />

passes through a narrow vented old culvert at the fag<br />

end of a PMGSY road – Rukunpur Khalshipara to<br />

Bangaljhi Ferry Ghat under Package No. WB/14/27.<br />

The stretch of road at this point would get inundated in<br />

every monsoon. Erosion was a predominant feature in<br />

this stretch. The folded plate brick masonry structure<br />

was used as a guide bank and it performed very well. It is<br />

observed that the fins of the folds acted like small spurs<br />

and the soil started depositing between the fins and<br />

chances of erosion has been reversed.<br />

Analysis of Economics<br />

A cost estimate has been done for three types of<br />

retaining wall 11.45 m. long to retain 1.5 m. high earth.<br />

The types of wall chosen are as under: -<br />

1. Folded plate Rat-Trap Bonded wall.<br />

2. Standard Trapezoidal Brick masonry wall.<br />

3. Standard Trapezoidal Plain Cement Concrete<br />

(1:2:4)<br />

The following table shows the comparative analysis of<br />

the economics of the types of walls.<br />

Type of Wall Cost / running meter<br />

1. Folded plate “Rat-Trap Rs. 1781.25 / m.<br />

bonded wall”<br />

2. Brick masonry retaining Rs. 3498.54 / m.<br />

wall<br />

3. Plain Concrete (1:2;4) Rs. 5104.60 / m.<br />

retaining wall

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!