Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy
Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy
Grameen Sampark Final April 0... - pmgsy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30<br />
Apart from the above, both faces of Rat Trap Bonded<br />
Brick wall are checked with plumb bob, so both the<br />
faces are uniform. As a result there is no necessity to<br />
provide plastering. All that would be required is neat<br />
cement pointing and patching on one edge of the<br />
header course. Hence there will be additional savings in<br />
plastering.<br />
On completion of construction and curing the back<br />
filling was done with, in layers by local earth of<br />
Maximum Dry Density (MDD) 1.70 gms./cc. Then an<br />
earth compactor was employed to roll and compact the<br />
retained earth. The compactor was directed to start<br />
rolling from about 1 m away from the retaining wall and<br />
it came slowly towards the folded wall and went on<br />
rolling moving over the corbelled shelves with full<br />
capacity of vibration, which is equivalent to 36 M.T.<br />
Observations<br />
Through the wall was expected to fail severely, it did<br />
not. The stretches where the relieving shelves were not<br />
in existence, after repetition of about 3-4 cycles of full<br />
vibration rolling the vertical joint at the junction of fold<br />
on the pond side showed a line of crack which<br />
propagated along the line of weakness of brick masonry.<br />
The maximum width of crack was about 35 mm and it<br />
appeared at about 7250 mm from GL i.e. at about at ½ of<br />
height from GL. This clearly signifies that the failure was<br />
due to intensity of rolling load to this enormous extent.<br />
Not by virtue of back filling. The entire operation was<br />
<strong>Grameen</strong> <strong>Sampark</strong><br />
video recorded. A selected portion of video recording is<br />
attached with a soft copy of this document.<br />
Progress of Field Tests<br />
A good number of folded plates were then applied to<br />
different locations of different projects as a cost effective<br />
tool for different height of retentions also. All are<br />
performing satisfactory till date. Some photographs are<br />
attached.<br />
In one instance folded plate has been applied to act as a<br />
guide bank beside a rivulet, which converges and<br />
passes through a narrow vented old culvert at the fag<br />
end of a PMGSY road – Rukunpur Khalshipara to<br />
Bangaljhi Ferry Ghat under Package No. WB/14/27.<br />
The stretch of road at this point would get inundated in<br />
every monsoon. Erosion was a predominant feature in<br />
this stretch. The folded plate brick masonry structure<br />
was used as a guide bank and it performed very well. It is<br />
observed that the fins of the folds acted like small spurs<br />
and the soil started depositing between the fins and<br />
chances of erosion has been reversed.<br />
Analysis of Economics<br />
A cost estimate has been done for three types of<br />
retaining wall 11.45 m. long to retain 1.5 m. high earth.<br />
The types of wall chosen are as under: -<br />
1. Folded plate Rat-Trap Bonded wall.<br />
2. Standard Trapezoidal Brick masonry wall.<br />
3. Standard Trapezoidal Plain Cement Concrete<br />
(1:2:4)<br />
The following table shows the comparative analysis of<br />
the economics of the types of walls.<br />
Type of Wall Cost / running meter<br />
1. Folded plate “Rat-Trap Rs. 1781.25 / m.<br />
bonded wall”<br />
2. Brick masonry retaining Rs. 3498.54 / m.<br />
wall<br />
3. Plain Concrete (1:2;4) Rs. 5104.60 / m.<br />
retaining wall