17.08.2013 Views

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

2012 Program Booklet - MCD Biology - University of Colorado Boulder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 TH <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium<br />

DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, &<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY<br />

OCTOBER 12 & 13, <strong>2012</strong>


Welcome<br />

The <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium is a biennial event held since<br />

1979 that brings together leading researchers in both academic fields and<br />

cutting-­‐edge biotechnology enterprises for two days <strong>of</strong> stimulating talks<br />

and interaction between members <strong>of</strong> our local scientific community.<br />

The symposium is entirely student-­‐organized, and as such, all the<br />

planning and fundraising is conducted solely by graduate students. We<br />

are delighted to announce the 26th <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium<br />

on Translational Science and Medicine. The symposium will be held on<br />

October 12-­‐13, <strong>2012</strong> at the new Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology<br />

Building at CU-­‐<strong>Boulder</strong>. It will begin with a keynote speaker and reception<br />

on Friday evening, followed by several sessions on Saturday. We are<br />

delighted that you will be participating during this enjoyable weekend <strong>of</strong><br />

science and discussion.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium Committee<br />

Carolina Daez, Kent Riemondy and Tess Shideler


Past <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposia<br />

1979 Membranes<br />

1980 Cell Motility<br />

1981 The Accuracy <strong>of</strong> Biological Processes<br />

1983 Evolution: Shaping Molecules, Microbes, and Complex<br />

Organisms<br />

1984 Contemporary Research in Plant <strong>Biology</strong><br />

1985 The Role <strong>of</strong> Complex Carbohydrates in Cellular Function<br />

1987 Sex Determination<br />

1989 Pathogen Strategies: Evasion and Suppression <strong>of</strong> the Immune<br />

System<br />

1990 Life at the Edge: From Prebiotic Chemistry to<br />

Extraterrestrial <strong>Biology</strong><br />

1991 Zen and the Art <strong>of</strong> Cell Cycle Maintenance<br />

1992 Evolution from the inside<br />

1993 The Self-­‐Wiring Machine: Development and Functional Organ<br />

Systems<br />

1994 The Human Genome<br />

1995 Self vs. Non-­‐Self: Modes <strong>of</strong> Organismal Recognition<br />

1996 Pattern and Polarity: Establishing Difference in Development<br />

1997 Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression: Beyond the<br />

Double Helix<br />

1998 The Molecular Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> Cellular Motility<br />

1999 <strong>Program</strong>med Cell Death: Making a Graceful Exit<br />

2000 Astrobiology: Life in the Universe<br />

2002 Genomics and Beyond: DNA tells all?<br />

2004 Cancer <strong>Biology</strong><br />

2006 Stem Cell <strong>Biology</strong><br />

2008 Infectious Disease and Host-­‐Pathogen Interactions<br />

2010 Neuroscience


Agenda<br />

Friday, October 12, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Time Location Event<br />

4.00-­‐5.00 pm Butcher Atrium Registration<br />

5.00-­‐5.10 pm Butcher Auditorium Welcome<br />

5.10-­‐6.10 pm Butcher Auditorium Keynote: Bill Freytag<br />

6.10-­‐6.55 pm Butcher Auditorium Jennifer Leeds<br />

6.55-­‐9.00 pm Butcher Atrium Dinner & Reception<br />

Saturday, October 13, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Time Location Event<br />

8.00-­‐9.00 am Butcher Atrium Breakfast and late<br />

Registration<br />

9.00-­‐9.30 am Butcher Auditorium Keynote: Larry Gold<br />

9.30-­‐10.15 am Butcher Auditorium Michael Yaffe<br />

10.15-­‐10.35 am Butcher Atrium C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

10.35-­‐11:20 am Butcher Auditorium William Marshall<br />

11.20-­‐12.05 pm Butcher Auditorium Stephen A. Williams<br />

12:05-­‐1.15 pm Butcher Atrium Lunch and Vendor<br />

Exhibition<br />

1.15-­‐2.00 pm Butcher Auditorium JoAnne Flynn<br />

2.00-­‐2.45 pm Butcher Auditorium John T. Schiller<br />

2.45-­‐3.15 pm Butcher Atrium C<strong>of</strong>fee Break<br />

3.15-­‐4.00 pm Butcher Auditorium Jeffrey Settleman<br />

4.00-­‐4.45 pm Butcher Auditorium Peter Jackson<br />

4.45-­‐5.30 pm Butcher Auditorium William Sullivan<br />

5.30-­‐7.00 pm Butcher Atrium Reception


Keynote Speaker:<br />

William Freytag, PhD<br />

Former Chairman and CEO, Myogen,<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong>, CO<br />

Title: Fifteen Years and $1.3 Billion Later<br />

Friday, October 12<br />

5:10 – 6:10 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

It is the mission <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical research companies to take the path from understanding a<br />

disease to bringing a safe and effective new treatment to patients. Scientists work to piece<br />

together the basic causes <strong>of</strong> disease at the level <strong>of</strong> genes, proteins and cells. Out <strong>of</strong> this<br />

understanding emerge “targets”, which potential new drugs might be able to<br />

affect. Researchers work to: (i) validate these targets, (ii) discover molecules (potential drug)<br />

that interact with the chosen target, (iii) test these new compounds in the lab and clinic for<br />

safety and efficacy, and (iv) gain regulatory approval and get the drug into the hands <strong>of</strong><br />

doctors and patients. This whole process typically takes 10-­‐15 years and an expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />

$1.3 billion.


Jennifer Leeds, PhD<br />

Executive Director-­‐ Antibacterial Discovery<br />

Infectious Diseases Area<br />

Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research<br />

Title: Discovery and development <strong>of</strong> LFF571, a<br />

novel antibacterial for the treatment <strong>of</strong> C.<br />

difficile infection.<br />

Friday, October 12<br />

6.10-­‐6.55 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Antibiotics are among the most important advances in the history <strong>of</strong> modern medicine.<br />

Antibiotics transform deadly bacterial infections into curable diseases, and enable surgical and<br />

medical innovation in nearly every therapeutic area. However, the increasing use <strong>of</strong><br />

antibiotics has contributed to the rise in drug resistant and multi-­‐drug resistant pathogens<br />

both in the community and in the hospital setting. At the same time, the number <strong>of</strong> new<br />

agents to treat bacterial infections is diminishing, partly due to the difficulty in identifying ideal<br />

targets and chemical starting points as well as increasing challenges in treating patients with<br />

complex medical needs. New agents should be potent against organisms exhibiting clinically-­‐<br />

relevant drug resistant phenotypes. The discovery <strong>of</strong> new chemical entities targeting<br />

unexploited mechanisms <strong>of</strong> growth inhibition is one strategy to address this hurdle. This was<br />

the origin <strong>of</strong> the drug discovery program that led us to discover LFF571. LFF571 is a new<br />

chemical entity that is currently being evaluated for safety and efficacy in patients with<br />

Clostridium difficile infection. The discovery and early development program for this novel<br />

compound will be presented.


Keynote Speaker:<br />

Larry Gold, PhD<br />

Chairman, Founder, and CEO <strong>of</strong> SomaLogic<br />

Founder <strong>of</strong> NeXstar and Synergen<br />

Title: Empowering Students: The Good and<br />

the Ugly<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

9:00 – 9:30 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

In 1973 or thereabouts Charlie Yegian died <strong>of</strong> leukemia. Charlie was a young pr<strong>of</strong>essor in<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B, he was my friend, and I missed him immediately and still miss him. He was a great<br />

teacheer. Jane Westlye and I arranged a Symposium to honor Charlie. It was a great<br />

Symposium. One <strong>of</strong> the speakers said about Charlie that "when he did an experiment it stayed<br />

done." There is no higher accolade for a scientist.<br />

I then had an idea, which was simple. We could continue to have Symposia like the one we<br />

had to honor Charlie, and I could help the students raise money (my specialty, apparently) and<br />

they could do the work and share the learning that came with putting on a science<br />

symposium. We have had great student-­‐driven symposia and some that were just OK -­‐ that is<br />

as it should be. We always have had good people come to speak. The tension (The Good and<br />

the Ugly") is built into the activity, and it has to be there. Students are young, and they have<br />

ideas that are, say, in progress -­‐ that has to be there. Students posture, unlike faculty, who<br />

never posture.


Michael B. Yaffe, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology (MIT)<br />

Title: Systems <strong>Biology</strong> Approaches to<br />

Optimizing Cancer Treatment<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

9:20 – 10:15 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Most current anti-­‐cancer drugs function by one <strong>of</strong> two general mechanisms: (1) targeting specific signaling<br />

molecules, particularly protein kinases and growth factor receptors; and (2) inducing cytotoxicity through DNA<br />

damage or disruption <strong>of</strong> the mitotic spindle. Targeted agents/signaling inhibitors, when used as<br />

monotherapies for cancer treatment are non-­‐curative. Although these drugs can induce dramatic tumor<br />

regression, and occasionally prolonged remissions, the cancers invariably recur. Alternatively, cytotoxic<br />

therapies that damage DNA have a long history <strong>of</strong> successful use as anti-­‐neoplastic agents. However, patient<br />

responses to DNA damaging drugs vary greatly, and heterogeneity within any single tumor can lead to the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> a resistant sub-­‐population <strong>of</strong> cells. The DNA damage from exposure <strong>of</strong> tumor cells to these<br />

cytotoxic agents is processed by a complex interacting network <strong>of</strong> signaling pathways involving protein<br />

kinases, phosphoserine/ threonine-­‐binding domains (14-­‐3-­‐3 proteins, FHA domains, BRCT domains), and<br />

ubiquitin/SUMO modifying enzymes. The outputs <strong>of</strong> these DNA damage-­‐activated pathways must be<br />

integrated with additional extracellular and intracellular cues such as cytokines and growth factor signals to<br />

control the resulting cellular response – cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis or senescence. How this array<br />

<strong>of</strong> diverse signals is functionally integrated and processed, and how these signal integration events can be<br />

influenced by combinations <strong>of</strong> anti-­‐cancer therapies to enhance tumor cell killing is unknown.<br />

To address this, we have been developing systems biology-­‐based models <strong>of</strong> DNA damage signaling<br />

where gene expression signatures, kinase activities, protein phosphorylation, and phosphoprotein-­‐binding<br />

events for multiple signaling pathways are quantitatively measured at densely sampled points in time, along<br />

with cellular responses such as cell cycle arrest, autophagy, and apoptosis. The resulting large dataset <strong>of</strong><br />

signals and responses are then related to each other mathematically using partial least squares regression,<br />

principal components analysis, and time-­‐interval stepwise regression. We have used this approach to examine<br />

the response <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and osteosarcoma cells to DNA damaging chemotherapy and gamma radiation<br />

in the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> small molecule inhibitors <strong>of</strong> growth factor signaling pathways. The resulting<br />

models, built from thousands <strong>of</strong> signaling measurements and hundreds <strong>of</strong> cellular response assays, reveals<br />

surprisingly paradoxical context-­‐dependent roles for the MEK-­‐Erk and p38/MK2 kinase signaling pathways in<br />

controlling cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and senescence after DNA damage. Using this approach, we recently<br />

identified a novel time-­‐staggered combination therapy in which EGFR inhibitor pre-­‐treatment is used to<br />

dramatically enhance DNA damage-­‐induced cell death in a subset <strong>of</strong> triple-­‐negative breast cancers by dynamic<br />

re-­‐wiring <strong>of</strong> apoptosis pathways. The results from these systems-­‐based studies illustrate the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

measuring time-­‐dependent changes in signaling pathways in evaluating and optimizing the effects <strong>of</strong> anti-­‐<br />

cancer drugs, and show the utility <strong>of</strong> a new concept – therapeutic network re-­‐wiring – in designing novel<br />

combination therapies with greater anti-­‐tumor efficacy.


William S. Marshall, PhD<br />

President and Chief Executive Officer<br />

miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.<br />

Title: microRNA targeting as a novel approach<br />

to the development <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular<br />

therapeutics<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

10:35 – 11:20 am<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Alterations in the expression <strong>of</strong> specific microRNAs have been observed in several<br />

cardiovascular disease models and human clinical samples, providing an exciting potential for<br />

therapeutic intervention. Genetic deletion studies that have been recapitulated by synthetic<br />

antimiR dosing studies demonstrated that the inhibition <strong>of</strong> certain microRNA’s is sufficient to<br />

produce beneficial outcomes in relevant disease models. Targeting such microRNAs with<br />

short, high-­‐affinity oligonucleotides has demonstrated significant promise, as this strategy<br />

benefits from the altered biophysical properties <strong>of</strong> the antimiR compared to traditional<br />

antisense or RNAi gene targeting approaches. These characteristics contribute to enhanced<br />

pharmaceutical properties <strong>of</strong> the antimiR. An overview <strong>of</strong> our lead programs will highlight<br />

several key pharmacological observations that help build confidence in the lead molecules as<br />

they advance towards human clinical evaluation.


Steven A. Williams, PhD<br />

Chief Medical Officer<br />

SomaLogic<br />

Title: The Voices <strong>of</strong> Life; Discovery <strong>of</strong> Protein<br />

Patterns in Health and Disease Using<br />

SOMAmers<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

11:20 – 12:05 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Despite the exciting promises being made about personalized medicine enabled by genetic<br />

testing, it is an impossible task. This is because the environment is not genetic, and yet has a<br />

big (or perhaps I should say "supersize") influence on health and disease, and because outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cancer our genetics don't significantly change from the time when we are babies to the<br />

day we die. The ideal health measurement would be <strong>of</strong> low cost and would respond to both<br />

environment and changes in health status. Proteins -­‐ as the downstream product <strong>of</strong> genetics<br />

and environment -­‐ have the right characteristics but the available technologies have not been<br />

up to the task <strong>of</strong> measuring thousands <strong>of</strong> them across a difference in abundance from the<br />

lowest to the highest <strong>of</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> billions to one. A new type <strong>of</strong> reagent will be described -­‐ the<br />

SOMAmer -­‐ which has enabled us to overcome these issues, and which has driven<br />

unprecedented discoveries. Examples will be shown from the early detection <strong>of</strong> cancer!<br />

to cardiovascular disease, and how individual tests can be bundled together to enable the<br />

"wellness chip", with the intention <strong>of</strong> lowering the cost <strong>of</strong> healthcare and improving health<br />

outcomes.


JoAnne Flynn, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Microbiology and<br />

Molecular Genetics<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh School <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

Title: Tuberculosis: Seeing is Believing<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

1:15 – 2:00 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Tuberculosis is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Humans infected with this bacillus can<br />

present with active TB (symptomatic) or clinically latent (asymptomatic) infection. The factors<br />

that determine the outcome <strong>of</strong> infection are not fully understood. Active TB can present in a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> ways, from mild to fulminant disease. Recently, we have proposed that latent<br />

infection also represents a spectrum <strong>of</strong> infections, and those that are “higher” on the<br />

spectrum <strong>of</strong> latency are more likely to develop reactivation TB. Using a non-­‐human primate<br />

model <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis, we have assessed the factors and events that influence outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

infection, and have used sophisticated whole-­‐body imaging to track the infection. Our findings<br />

indicate that the spectrum <strong>of</strong> M. tuberculosis infection that exists in the population can also<br />

exist in a single host. Using imaging, immunology, bacteriology and modeling, we have data to<br />

demonstrate the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> infection within a single host at the level <strong>of</strong> the granuloma.<br />

Data on the variability in granulomas will be presented. This variability has implications for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> drugs to effectively and efficiently treat tuberculosis, as well as vaccines to<br />

prevent infection or disease.


John T. Schiller, PhD<br />

Head, Neoplastic Disease Section<br />

Deputy Laboratory Chief<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Cellular Oncology<br />

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.<br />

Title: Understanding and Learning from the<br />

Success <strong>of</strong> Human Papillomavirus Prophylactic<br />

Vaccines<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

2:00 – 2:45 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> antimicrobial vaccines is undoubtedly one <strong>of</strong> the greatest triumphs <strong>of</strong><br />

biomedical research. Given the extraordinary effectiveness <strong>of</strong> vaccines against a wide array <strong>of</strong><br />

bacterial and viral pathogens, the failure to develop effective vaccines against the most<br />

common sexually transmitted infections, especially HIV, has been both surprising and<br />

frustrating. The only notable exception is the development <strong>of</strong> prophylactic vaccines against<br />

genital human papillomaviruses (HPVs), the primary etiologic agents in an estimated 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

human cancers, most importantly cervical cancer. In recently concluded clinical trials, the<br />

vaccines were safe and very effective at preventing sexually transmitted infection and the<br />

neoplastic diseases induced by the HPV types targeted by the vaccines. They are now licensed<br />

in many countries worldwide for the prevention <strong>of</strong> cervical and other HPV-­‐associated cancers<br />

and various other hyperproliferative diseases. It is therefore interesting to examine why the<br />

HPV vaccines have succeeded whereas those targeting other sexually transmitted infections<br />

(STIs) have failed. In this seminar, I will briefly review the association <strong>of</strong> HPVs with human<br />

cancer and other neoplastic diseases, describe the composition <strong>of</strong> the two commercial<br />

vaccines and summarize their efficacy in clinical trials and their emerging effectiveness in<br />

general vaccination programs. Specific aspects <strong>of</strong> HPV molecular biology and vaccine<br />

composition that likely contribute to their remarkable success will then be discussed. Finally, I<br />

will speculate on how the lessons learned from the HPV vaccines might influence the future <strong>of</strong><br />

vaccine development for other STIs, particularly HIV and herpes simplex.


Jeffrey Settleman, PhD<br />

Senior Director, Discovery Oncology<br />

Genentech<br />

Title: The Many Flavors <strong>of</strong> Resistance to<br />

Anti-­‐Cancer Drugs<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

3:15 – 4:00 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

The recent clinical success experienced with several “rationally-­‐targeted” anti-­‐cancer drugs, such as<br />

the kinase inhibitors imatinib, erlotinib, crizotinib, and vemurafenib, has defined a paradigm shift in<br />

cancer therapy. However, despite the sometimes impressive clinical activity associated with these<br />

agents, progression during therapy is inevitable due to the acquisition <strong>of</strong> drug resistance. For many<br />

drugs, specific genetic mechanisms <strong>of</strong> resistance have been elucidated, and pre-­‐clinical findings<br />

implicate additional non-­‐genetic mechanisms. Moreover, accumulating evidence implicates<br />

heterogeneity within cancer cell populations in the response to drug treatment, posing an additional<br />

challenge to the development <strong>of</strong> effective cancer therapeutics.<br />

While modeling the acute response to various anti-­‐cancer agents in drug-­‐sensitive tumor cell lines, we<br />

consistently observed a small subpopulation <strong>of</strong> reversibly “drug-­‐tolerant” cells. This drug-­‐tolerant<br />

phenotype, associated with a distinct chromatin state, is transiently acquired and relinquished at low<br />

frequency by individual cells within the population, implicating the dynamic regulation <strong>of</strong> phenotypic<br />

heterogeneity in drug tolerance. The drug-­‐tolerant subpopulation can be selectively ablated by<br />

treatment with chromatin-­‐modifying agents, potentially yielding a therapeutic opportunity. These<br />

findings suggest that cancer cell populations employ an epigenetically-­‐regulated dynamic survival<br />

strategy in which individual cells transiently assume a reversibly drug-­‐tolerant state to protect the<br />

population from eradication by potentially lethal exposures.<br />

Cancer cells typically express multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that mediate signals that<br />

converge on common critical downstream cell survival effectors -­‐ most notably, phosphatidylinositol<br />

3-­‐kinase and mitogen-­‐activated protein kinase. Consequently, increased RTK ligand levels, via<br />

autocrine tumor cell production, paracrine contribution by tumor stroma, or systemic production,<br />

could confer resistance to inhibitors <strong>of</strong> an oncogenic kinase with a similar signaling output. Using a<br />

panel <strong>of</strong> kinase-­‐“addicted” cancer cell lines, we found that most cells can be “rescued” from drug<br />

sensitivity by simply exposing them to one or more RTK ligands. Among the findings with clinical<br />

implications was the observation that hepatocyte growth factor confers resistance to the BRAF<br />

inhibitor vemurafenib in BRAF mutant melanoma cells. These observations highlight the extensive<br />

redundancy <strong>of</strong> RTK-­‐transduced signalling in cancer cells and the potentially broad role <strong>of</strong> widely<br />

expressed RTK ligands in innate and acquired resistance to drugs targeting oncogenic kinases.


Peter Jackson, PhD<br />

Staff Scientist: Research Oncology<br />

Genentech<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

4:00 – 4:45 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Research Focus:<br />

My laboratory has worked on the biochemistry <strong>of</strong> the cell cycle, including DNA replication and<br />

mitosis. Much <strong>of</strong> our effort has gone toward understanding how proteolytic degradation by<br />

the ubiquitin proteasome system regulates the cell cycle.<br />

We have made key contributions to understanding how proteins that regulate the cell cycle,<br />

called cyclins, accumulate and are destroyed in vertebrate cells and in eggs. A central finding<br />

was our discovery <strong>of</strong> inhibitors <strong>of</strong> E3 ubiquitin ligases and their role in cell cycle control. We<br />

have identified several critical factors regulating cyclins and have linked their misregulation to<br />

cancer, proliferative disease and senescence. We continue to define important regulators in<br />

mitosis and in the ubiquitin pathway.<br />

Our recent work has also focused on signaling through the primary cilium. The primary cilium<br />

is an organelle with critical roles in signaling in tissues including the retina, nervous system,<br />

kidney and sensory organs. The importance <strong>of</strong> the cilia in signaling was only recently<br />

appreciated, but this structure organizes a still unknown number <strong>of</strong> receptor systems. These<br />

pathways are genetically linked to important degenerative diseases including renal cystic<br />

disease, obesity, diabetes, retinopathies and cancer signaling. We have used proteomic<br />

approaches to define regulatory networks linked to proteins that are defective in human<br />

diseases called ciliopathies. We are looking for critical receptor classes linked to these diseases<br />

and evaluating the therapeutic opportunities presented by these receptors


William Sullivan, PhD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular, Cell &<br />

Developmental <strong>Biology</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> California, Santa Cruz (UCSC)<br />

Title: Wolbachia, African River Blindness, and<br />

Big Sur<br />

Saturday, October 13<br />

4:45 – 5:30 pm<br />

JSCBB Butcher Auditorium<br />

Abstract:<br />

Wolbachia are obligate, intracellular, bacterial endosymbionts present in over 60% <strong>of</strong> all insect<br />

species. Manipulation <strong>of</strong> host reproduction and efficient maternal transmission have<br />

facilitated the global spread <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia in arthropods. Wolbachia are also present in filarial<br />

nematodes and are the leading cause <strong>of</strong> River Blindness and Elephantiasis. Our lab has<br />

focussed on the molecular and cellular interactions that mediate Wolbachia replication and<br />

transmission through insect and nematode germlines. Our studies demonstrate that efficient<br />

germline transmission <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia requires a developmentally coordinated association with<br />

plus and minus end motor proteins followed by a stable association in conserved germline<br />

determinants. In addition, Wolbachia manipulates host chromatin remodelers and the cell<br />

cycle to its advantage. Surveys <strong>of</strong> wild Drosophila populations reveals Wolbachia also stably<br />

populates host somatic lineages including the adult brain. Consequently we were able to<br />

generate stably Wolbachiainfected Drosophila cell lines. This facilitated high-­‐throughput cell-­‐<br />

based screens for small molecule compounds that specifically target Wolbachia. We descrbe<br />

the identification <strong>of</strong> Albendazole sulfone, an FDA approved metabolite <strong>of</strong> Albendazole, that<br />

specifically disrupts Wolbachia replication in Brugia malayi, the nematode associated with<br />

Elephantiasis and<br />

River Blindness.


Acknowledgements<br />

The <strong>MCD</strong>B Graduate Student Symposium is a collaborative effort that would not<br />

be possible without the contributions <strong>of</strong> numerous individuals including<br />

undergraduate and graduate students, faculty and staff. Their dedication and<br />

enthusiasm has helped shape the engaging and collaborative environment found<br />

in the <strong>MCD</strong>B department.<br />

Special Thanks:<br />

Wendi Howard, Lee Gutmacher and Jaime Birren: Finance assistance<br />

Kathy Lozier: Travel arrangements and event logistics<br />

Karen Brown: Event logistics<br />

Laura Garret (SOFO): Budget coordination<br />

Erik Hedl and Alex Laszlo Bagi: Website design and registration databases<br />

Jessica Daez: Symposium logo design<br />

Vicky Romano and Lee Silbert: JSC Biotechnology venue coordination<br />

Ken Krauter: Graduate student mentor<br />

Elizabeth O'Connell (Front Range Catering Company): Catering and rentals<br />

In addition, special thanks to the numerous volunteers:<br />

Every two years, the graduate students in the <strong>MCD</strong>B department at the <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Colorado</strong>, <strong>Boulder</strong> organize a scientific symposium. We are delighted that an<br />

overwhelming number <strong>of</strong> undergraduate and graduate students have volunteered<br />

their time and talents to help with this year’s symposium. Students helped<br />

coordinate the entire event, including choosing this year’s topic, inviting speakers<br />

and helping with the logistical planning. The result is a day and a half <strong>of</strong><br />

stimulating talks and interaction between members <strong>of</strong> our scientific community.<br />

<strong>2012</strong> Graduate Student Symposium Organizing Committee:<br />

Carolina Daez (3rd year, Winey lab)<br />

Kent Riemondy (5th year, Yi Lab)<br />

Tess Shideler (6th year, Odorizzi lab)<br />

In memoriam:<br />

Dr. David M Prescott Distinguished Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus <strong>MCD</strong>B 1926-­‐2011<br />

Dr. Richard Ham Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus <strong>MCD</strong>B 1932-­‐2011


Symposium Location<br />

Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology Building<br />

Butcher Auditorium<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Colorado</strong>, <strong>Boulder</strong><br />

3415 <strong>Colorado</strong> Ave.,<br />

<strong>Boulder</strong> CO 80303<br />

Symposium Parking Map


<strong>2012</strong> PRESENTING SPONSORS


<strong>2012</strong> PRESENTING SPONSORS<br />

Arts and Science Student Government (ASSG)<br />

Center for the Integrative Study <strong>of</strong> Work in Living Systems,<br />

UCB<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Colleges and Schools (CCS)<br />

Student Group Funding Board (SGFB)<br />

Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs (VCSA)<br />

<strong>MCD</strong>B Undergraduate Club<br />

NIH Institutional Training Grant<br />

"Creative Training in Molecular <strong>Biology</strong>" GM-07135<br />

The Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular, Cellular<br />

and Developmental <strong>Biology</strong>


Notes:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!