Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use 3.0 Summary The majority of the municipal WWTPs in Minnesota produce a good quality secondary effluent with low nutrient levels (CBOD5 < 5 mg/L, TSS < 5 mg/L, TP < 1 mg/L, NH3 < 5 mg/L, and fecal coliform < 10/100 mL). This provides a good “base level” water quality for supplying reclaimed wastewater from municipalities to industries. Specific industry water quality requirements will determine if additional treatment processes will be required. It is most likely that additional disinfection treatment will be required to meet the total coliform limits required by Minnesota permitting practices. The majority of plants, particularly the larger WWTPs, will not need further reduction of organics, particulate solids, and nutrients for industrial uses requiring lower levels of quality or little concern for dissolved solid concentrations. If hardness, dissolved salts, or trace constituents need to be removed, then additional reduction of organic, suspended solids and nutrients will be required for optimum treatment process performance. 4.0 References Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 2005. Minnesota Discharge Monitoring Report data obtained through the Environmental Data Access system, April 2006. Refer to: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/edaWater/index.cfm. 28 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc
Craddock Consulting Engineers 1 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM4-Appendix A_0707.doc Appendix A Data Analysis Methods Database Used: MPCA Discharge Monitoring Reports (2003-2005; 2005 focus) Filenames (as received from MPCA): Water Quality Data (http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/edaWater/index.cfm) Date data received from MPCA: April 19, 2006 Analysis Approach Step 1: Import the original MPCA water quality data (in text file format) into Microsoft Access. Step 2: Create queries in the Access database to extract annual maximum, minimum, and average value of the calendar month average water quality data in 2005 for each municipal wastewater treatment facility, discharging to a water body, in Minnesota. Water quality parameters evaluated include CBOD5, TSS, NH3, P, and fecal coliform. Step 3: Display average values of effluent quality spatially for the state. This required linking the 2005 water quality data generated from the MS Access query analysis to the shapefile for the wastewater treatment facilities (WWTPs). Step 4: Generate maps and graphics to characterize average effluent quality of Minnesota’s municipal WWTPs. • Evaluate the variability of effluent quality through general statistics and percentile plots for each water quality parameter. • Determine appropriate ranges to characterize each constituent. • Create GIS maps that show WWTPs and range of effluent quality. • Generate bar charts and pie charts to summarize the number of WWTPs and permitted capacity based on the effluent quality ranges.
- Page 517 and 518: Cost Curves as Basis for Tertiary 4
- Page 519 and 520: Appendix D-5 Water Reuse System Cos
- Page 521 and 522: Water Reuse System Estimates of Pro
- Page 523 and 524: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 5.00
- Page 525 and 526: Appendix D-6 Water Reuse System Cos
- Page 527 and 528: Water Reuse System Estimates of Pro
- Page 529 and 530: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 5.00
- Page 531 and 532: Cost Curves as Basis for Tertiary 4
- Page 533 and 534: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 535 and 536: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 537 and 538: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 539 and 540: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 541 and 542: Craddock Consulting Engineers 1 In
- Page 543 and 544: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 545 and 546: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 547 and 548: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 549 and 550: Frequency of Occurrence, % Frequenc
- Page 551 and 552: No. of Plants Total Permitting Desi
- Page 553 and 554: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 555 and 556: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 557 and 558: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 559 and 560: Frequency of Occurrence, % Frequenc
- Page 561 and 562: No. of Plants Total Permitting Desi
- Page 563 and 564: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 565 and 566: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 567: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 571 and 572: 1.0 Introduction This technical mem
- Page 573 and 574: Exhibit A Regulatory Stakeholder Me
- Page 575 and 576: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 577 and 578: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 579 and 580: Municipal Wastewater Reuse Regulato
- Page 581 and 582: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 583 and 584: Exhibit B Industry Stakeholder Meet
- Page 585 and 586: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 587 and 588: Institutional Issues Topic Discussi
- Page 589 and 590: Institutional Issues Topic Discussi
- Page 591 and 592: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 593 and 594: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 595 and 596: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 597 and 598: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 599 and 600: Exhibit C Broader Base Stakeholder
- Page 601 and 602: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 603 and 604: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 605 and 606: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 607 and 608: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 609 and 610: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 611 and 612: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality<br />
<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
3.0 Summary<br />
The majority of the municipal WWTPs in Minnesota produce a good quality<br />
secondary effluent with low nutrient levels (CBOD5 < 5 mg/L, TSS < 5 mg/L, TP < 1<br />
mg/L, NH3 < 5 mg/L, and fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m < 10/100 mL). This provides a good “base<br />
level” water quality <strong>for</strong> supplying reclaimed wastewater from municipalities to<br />
industries. Specific industry water quality requirements will determine if additional<br />
treatment processes will be required. It is most likely that additional disinfection<br />
treatment will be required to meet the total coli<strong>for</strong>m limits required by Minnesota<br />
permitting practices. The majority of plants, particularly the larger WWTPs, will not<br />
need further reduction of organics, particulate solids, and nutrients <strong>for</strong> industrial uses<br />
requiring lower levels of quality or little concern <strong>for</strong> dissolved solid concentrations. If<br />
hardness, dissolved salts, or trace constituents need to be removed, then additional<br />
reduction of organic, suspended solids and nutrients will be required <strong>for</strong> optimum<br />
treatment process per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
4.0 References<br />
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 2005. Minnesota Discharge Monitoring<br />
Report data obtained through the Environmental Data Access system, April 2006.<br />
Refer to: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/eda<strong>Water</strong>/index.cfm.<br />
28 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc