Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

archive.leg.state.mn.us
from archive.leg.state.mn.us More from this publisher
17.08.2013 Views

TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use 3.0 Summary The majority of the municipal WWTPs in Minnesota produce a good quality secondary effluent with low nutrient levels (CBOD5 < 5 mg/L, TSS < 5 mg/L, TP < 1 mg/L, NH3 < 5 mg/L, and fecal coliform < 10/100 mL). This provides a good “base level” water quality for supplying reclaimed wastewater from municipalities to industries. Specific industry water quality requirements will determine if additional treatment processes will be required. It is most likely that additional disinfection treatment will be required to meet the total coliform limits required by Minnesota permitting practices. The majority of plants, particularly the larger WWTPs, will not need further reduction of organics, particulate solids, and nutrients for industrial uses requiring lower levels of quality or little concern for dissolved solid concentrations. If hardness, dissolved salts, or trace constituents need to be removed, then additional reduction of organic, suspended solids and nutrients will be required for optimum treatment process performance. 4.0 References Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 2005. Minnesota Discharge Monitoring Report data obtained through the Environmental Data Access system, April 2006. Refer to: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/edaWater/index.cfm. 28 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc

Craddock Consulting Engineers 1 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM4-Appendix A_0707.doc Appendix A Data Analysis Methods Database Used: MPCA Discharge Monitoring Reports (2003-2005; 2005 focus) Filenames (as received from MPCA): Water Quality Data (http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/edaWater/index.cfm) Date data received from MPCA: April 19, 2006 Analysis Approach Step 1: Import the original MPCA water quality data (in text file format) into Microsoft Access. Step 2: Create queries in the Access database to extract annual maximum, minimum, and average value of the calendar month average water quality data in 2005 for each municipal wastewater treatment facility, discharging to a water body, in Minnesota. Water quality parameters evaluated include CBOD5, TSS, NH3, P, and fecal coliform. Step 3: Display average values of effluent quality spatially for the state. This required linking the 2005 water quality data generated from the MS Access query analysis to the shapefile for the wastewater treatment facilities (WWTPs). Step 4: Generate maps and graphics to characterize average effluent quality of Minnesota’s municipal WWTPs. • Evaluate the variability of effluent quality through general statistics and percentile plots for each water quality parameter. • Determine appropriate ranges to characterize each constituent. • Create GIS maps that show WWTPs and range of effluent quality. • Generate bar charts and pie charts to summarize the number of WWTPs and permitted capacity based on the effluent quality ranges.

TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

3.0 Summary<br />

The majority of the municipal WWTPs in Minnesota produce a good quality<br />

secondary effluent with low nutrient levels (CBOD5 < 5 mg/L, TSS < 5 mg/L, TP < 1<br />

mg/L, NH3 < 5 mg/L, and fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m < 10/100 mL). This provides a good “base<br />

level” water quality <strong>for</strong> supplying reclaimed wastewater from municipalities to<br />

industries. Specific industry water quality requirements will determine if additional<br />

treatment processes will be required. It is most likely that additional disinfection<br />

treatment will be required to meet the total coli<strong>for</strong>m limits required by Minnesota<br />

permitting practices. The majority of plants, particularly the larger WWTPs, will not<br />

need further reduction of organics, particulate solids, and nutrients <strong>for</strong> industrial uses<br />

requiring lower levels of quality or little concern <strong>for</strong> dissolved solid concentrations. If<br />

hardness, dissolved salts, or trace constituents need to be removed, then additional<br />

reduction of organic, suspended solids and nutrients will be required <strong>for</strong> optimum<br />

treatment process per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

4.0 References<br />

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 2005. Minnesota Discharge Monitoring<br />

Report data obtained through the Environmental Data Access system, April 2006.<br />

Refer to: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/data/eda<strong>Water</strong>/index.cfm.<br />

28 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!