Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Figure 27. Effluent Ammonia and Number of Municipal WWTPs in Minnesota >10 mg/L, 6.5 mgd (0.9%) 5-10 mg/L, 24 mgd (3.1%) 1-5 mg/L, 128.5 mgd (16.8%) < 1 mg/L, 64 WWTPs (11.0%) not measured, 139.6 mgd (18.3%) 1-5 mg/L, 22 WWTPs (3.8%) 5-10 mg/L, 12 WWTPs (2.1%) >10 mg/L, 4 WWTPs (0.7%) not me a sure d, 481 W W T Ps (82.5%)
TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Craddock Consulting Engineers 23 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc Fecal Coliforms Fecal coliforms are commonly used as indicator organisms of pathogenic organisms found in treated wastewater. The presence of coliform organisms is taken as an indication that pathogenic organisms may also be present, and the absence of coliform organisms is taken as an indication that the water is free from disease-producing organisms. The only constituent regulated by the California Water Recycling Criteria (the regulations Minnesota uses for administering permits for water reuse) for industrial water uses is an indicator organism, total coliforms. For uses that are not likely to contact humans, the total coliform limit is 23/100 ml. For uses with potential for human contact, the total coliform limit is 2.2/100 ml. Most WWTPs in Minnesota are permitted to meet a fecal coliform limit of 200. Fecal coliforms are a subset of total coliforms. Figure 29 presents the frequency of occurrence of fecal coliforms in the effluent of all Minnesota WWTPs. Similar information is shown in Figure 30 for WWTPs with design capacities greater than 1 mgd. The variability of effluent fecal coliforms is also characterized for the following ranges: 100/100 mL. The average WWTP effluent fecal coliform concentrations are depicted by location and facility capacity in Figure 31 and further detailed in Figures 32-35. Minnesota facilities produce a high quality effluent in terms of fecal coliforms. There were 170 facilities with fecal coliform counts less than 10/100 mL, accounting for 150 mgd of the WWTP capacity in the state. Nearly 300 facilities with a design capacity totaling 535 mgd have effluent fecal coliform concentrations in the 10-100/100 mL range. Over 40 WWTPs, with a combined capacity of 70 mgd, produce an effluent with a fecal coliform count greater than 100/100 mL.
- Page 511 and 512: Cost Curves as Basis for Tertiary 3
- Page 513 and 514: Water Reuse System Estimated Cost o
- Page 515 and 516: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 10.0
- Page 517 and 518: Cost Curves as Basis for Tertiary 4
- Page 519 and 520: Appendix D-5 Water Reuse System Cos
- Page 521 and 522: Water Reuse System Estimates of Pro
- Page 523 and 524: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 5.00
- Page 525 and 526: Appendix D-6 Water Reuse System Cos
- Page 527 and 528: Water Reuse System Estimates of Pro
- Page 529 and 530: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 5.00
- Page 531 and 532: Cost Curves as Basis for Tertiary 4
- Page 533 and 534: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 535 and 536: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 537 and 538: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 539 and 540: Secondary Treatment Assumptions Sus
- Page 541 and 542: Craddock Consulting Engineers 1 In
- Page 543 and 544: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 545 and 546: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 547 and 548: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 549 and 550: Frequency of Occurrence, % Frequenc
- Page 551 and 552: No. of Plants Total Permitting Desi
- Page 553 and 554: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 555 and 556: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 557 and 558: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 559 and 560: Frequency of Occurrence, % Frequenc
- Page 561: No. of Plants Total Permitting Desi
- Page 565 and 566: !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(
- Page 567 and 568: TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality Recyclin
- Page 569 and 570: Craddock Consulting Engineers 1 In
- Page 571 and 572: 1.0 Introduction This technical mem
- Page 573 and 574: Exhibit A Regulatory Stakeholder Me
- Page 575 and 576: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 577 and 578: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 579 and 580: Municipal Wastewater Reuse Regulato
- Page 581 and 582: MCES Recycling Treated Wastewater f
- Page 583 and 584: Exhibit B Industry Stakeholder Meet
- Page 585 and 586: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 587 and 588: Institutional Issues Topic Discussi
- Page 589 and 590: Institutional Issues Topic Discussi
- Page 591 and 592: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 593 and 594: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 595 and 596: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 597 and 598: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 599 and 600: Exhibit C Broader Base Stakeholder
- Page 601 and 602: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 603 and 604: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 605 and 606: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 607 and 608: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 609 and 610: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
- Page 611 and 612: Recycling Treated Wastewater For In
TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality<br />
<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
Figure 27. Effluent Ammonia and Number of <strong>Municipal</strong> WWTPs in Minnesota<br />
>10 mg/L,<br />
6.5 mgd<br />
(0.9%)<br />
5-10 mg/L, 24<br />
mgd (3.1%)<br />
1-5 mg/L,<br />
128.5 mgd<br />
(16.8%)<br />
< 1 mg/L, 64 WWTPs (11.0%)<br />
not measured, 139.6 mgd (18.3%)<br />
1-5 mg/L, 22 WWTPs (3.8%)<br />
5-10 mg/L, 12 WWTPs (2.1%)<br />
>10 mg/L, 4 WWTPs (0.7%)<br />
not me a sure d, 481 W W T Ps<br />
(82.5%)<br />