17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TM4: WWTP Effluent Quality<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

2.0 Analysis Background and Results<br />

Data Source<br />

All WWTPs are required to submit discharge monitoring reports in accordance with<br />

their NPDES permit. Historic records of WWTP influent and effluent quantity and<br />

quality are maintained by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). These<br />

data and the corresponding GIS data were provided by MPCA through the<br />

Environmental Data Access system and used in this analysis (MPCA, 2005).<br />

The discharge monitoring report data are entered into the Environmental Data Access<br />

system as reported by the municipality. In<strong>for</strong>mation can be incorrectly listed on the<br />

monitoring reports by the municipality (i.e. misplacement of a decimal point is a<br />

common error). These “incorrect” values are not identified or changed unless the<br />

municipality contacts the MPCA with revised values or if the reported values exceed<br />

permitted limits and MPCA takes en<strong>for</strong>cement action and inquires about the<br />

exceedance. For this study, all data are presented as contained in the database.<br />

Data Analysis Methods<br />

Monthly discharge data were summarized as annual average flows and concentration<br />

to per<strong>for</strong>m statistical analyses. The 2005 water quality data were linked to the WWTPs<br />

location shapefile and maps were generated to characterize the average annual<br />

effluent quality of Minnesota’s municipal WWTPs. A summary of the data analysis is<br />

presented below. Appendix A presents the detailed data analysis methods.<br />

The constituents of concern evaluated in this study are not monitored in the effluent<br />

of all facilities. This study identifies a constituent as “not measured” if it is not<br />

monitored at these facilities. The term “not measured” is also used to designate<br />

missing data <strong>for</strong> a specific constituent at an individual WWTP, but this is a rare<br />

occurrence.<br />

Results<br />

CBOD5<br />

The organic concentration in the water supply needs to be kept at a minimum <strong>for</strong><br />

most industrial water uses. Organic matter provides a food source <strong>for</strong> microbial<br />

growth which can lead to biological fouling and related scaling problems.<br />

Consumption of oxygen and reduced oxygen levels could be a concern <strong>for</strong> some<br />

industries. Also disinfection processes are less stable with higher organic<br />

concentrations. Several states with water reuse regulations require reclaimed water to<br />

meet a CBOD5 limit of 20 mg/L <strong>for</strong> various uses. CBOD5, or related parameters such<br />

as BOD5 or TOC, are constituents routinely tested in WWTP effluent, with CBOD5 the<br />

most common one <strong>for</strong> Minnesota’s WWTPs. Higher effluent CBOD5 concentrations<br />

are often indicative of facilities with lower levels of treatment or possibly facilities that<br />

are operating at the capacity limit and are not achieving the per<strong>for</strong>mance expected <strong>for</strong><br />

critical treatment processes.<br />

2 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM4-WWTP Eff Quality_0707.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!