Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

archive.leg.state.mn.us
from archive.leg.state.mn.us More from this publisher
17.08.2013 Views

TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Table 16. Unit Construction and Project Costs for Force Mains 1 Unit Construction Cost , $/lf Unit Project Cost 2, $/lf Diameter Urban Rural Urban Rural (inches) Area Area Area Area 4 54 44 97 79 6 59 48 106 86 8 64 53 115 95 10 71 60 128 108 12 78 66 140 119 14 87 76 157 137 16 105 93 189 167 18 117 105 211 189 20 131 119 236 214 24 158 146 284 263 30 196 180 353 324 36 241 224 434 403 42 295 277 531 499 48 373 353 671 635 54 434 413 781 743 60 495 470 891 846 1 Based on the following: -Sept. 2006 dollars, ENR CCI = 7763 -Mean Indices, 2006 and Cost Tool with detailed unit costs (App. B, Exhibit 1) -Average depth of installation for force mains assumed to be 8 ft. -4 to 24” pipe is PVC; >24” is DIP 2 Project unit costs based on master planning level assumptions: 50% for undeveloped design detail (includes allowance for related appurtenances). Operation and Maintenance Costs Transmission system operations costs characterized for this cost model include electrical power costs and a unit cost per mile for equipment and labor to maintain the distribution system. The total dynamic head was calculated for a range of flows and pipe lengths to estimate the pumping costs. Regression analysis was used to provide the relationship of power costs to flow at various pipe lengths. Appendix B documents this analysis. The cost to maintain the transmission pipe system is based on the length of the pipe. The unit cost selected, $5,500 per mile per year, is based on WWTP records for maintenance of reclaimed water transmission system for Cary, North Carolina, escalated for larger flows (CDM, 2004). It also compares reasonably to literature references (Gumerman et al, 1992) Craddock Consulting Engineers 33 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use 5.4.5 Base Water Reuse System Cost Analysis Results The cost curves developed for the base system indicate that a reclaimed water supply system can be cost competitive with potable water supplies in Minnesota. This assumes that an advanced secondary wastewater treatment plant effluent water quality is available from existing facilities and is suitable for that industry, or that industry already has a treatment system in place for its existing supply that can be used (or upgraded at a nominal cost for a reclaimed supply). As shown in Figure 5 and tabulated in Appendix C, a reclaimed water system designed for an annual average flow of less than 0.5 mgd is not expected to be competitive with most potable water supplies, except where the industry is in close proximity to the WWTP. At 1 mgd, the cost of service is comparable or less than a typical potable water supply system cost of $2/1000 gallons for systems under 10 miles. As the system capacity increases to 5 mgd, a 10-mile system costs about $1/1000 gallons. For flows greater than 5 mgd, as shown in Figure 6, costs drop below $0.60/1000 gallons, even at a distance of 10 miles for 30 mgd. Potable water supplies in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area range from $1-$3/1000 gallons and fluctuate around that cost in other areas of Minnesota. Some rural water systems have costs over $5.00/1000 gallon. Water reuse system costs are compared to potable water supply costs to provide a perspective on the water supply market for Minnesota. Those industries with their own water supply will typically have much lower costs than for a potable supply. A comparison to a potable supply is reasonable for smaller water using industries (less than 0.5 mgd water demand), which often use potable supplies, particularly in urban areas. If higher quality water is required, then potable supplies are also used and at higher volumes. Technical Memorandum 1: Implementation Issues and Customer Inventory produced for this project evaluated industries within a 5-mile range of metro area WWTPs and larger ranges in the rest of Minnesota. The base system cost of service curves indicate that service to those industries within 5 miles of a WWTP with a combined reclaimed water demand of 1 mgd or more could be provided at about $1.00/1000 gallons or less, making it competitive with potable supplies. The base system provides a water quality that could possibly be suitable for a oncethrough cooling process or sand and gravel washing. It would also be sufficient for irrigation of restricted areas on industrial site grounds. To meet the anticipated water requirements for much of Minnesota’s industrial water demand, additional treatment at the WWTP or the industry site will be required. Given the high hardness in Minnesota’s source waters and high salt concentrations in wastewater (elevated chloride concentrations have been attributed to home softening system brine discharges), additional treatment may be necessary for the intended industrial water use. The treatment costs for a range of industrial uses are the subject of Section 5.6. 34 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

5.4.5 Base <strong>Water</strong> Reuse System Cost Analysis Results<br />

The cost curves developed <strong>for</strong> the base system indicate that a reclaimed water supply<br />

system can be cost competitive with potable water supplies in Minnesota. This<br />

assumes that an advanced secondary wastewater treatment plant effluent water<br />

quality is available from existing facilities and is suitable <strong>for</strong> that industry, or that<br />

industry already has a treatment system in place <strong>for</strong> its existing supply that can be<br />

used (or upgraded at a nominal cost <strong>for</strong> a reclaimed supply).<br />

As shown in Figure 5 and tabulated in Appendix C, a reclaimed water system<br />

designed <strong>for</strong> an annual average flow of less than 0.5 mgd is not expected to be<br />

competitive with most potable water supplies, except where the industry is in close<br />

proximity to the WWTP. At 1 mgd, the cost of service is comparable or less than a<br />

typical potable water supply system cost of $2/1000 gallons <strong>for</strong> systems under 10<br />

miles. As the system capacity increases to 5 mgd, a 10-mile system costs about<br />

$1/1000 gallons. For flows greater than 5 mgd, as shown in Figure 6, costs drop below<br />

$0.60/1000 gallons, even at a distance of 10 miles <strong>for</strong> 30 mgd.<br />

Potable water supplies in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area range from $1-$3/1000<br />

gallons and fluctuate around that cost in other areas of Minnesota. Some rural water<br />

systems have costs over $5.00/1000 gallon. <strong>Water</strong> reuse system costs are compared to<br />

potable water supply costs to provide a perspective on the water supply market <strong>for</strong><br />

Minnesota. Those industries with their own water supply will typically have much<br />

lower costs than <strong>for</strong> a potable supply. A comparison to a potable supply is reasonable<br />

<strong>for</strong> smaller water using industries (less than 0.5 mgd water demand), which often use<br />

potable supplies, particularly in urban areas. If higher quality water is required, then<br />

potable supplies are also used and at higher volumes.<br />

Technical Memorandum 1: Implementation Issues and Customer Inventory produced<br />

<strong>for</strong> this project evaluated industries within a 5-mile range of metro area WWTPs and<br />

larger ranges in the rest of Minnesota. The base system cost of service curves indicate<br />

that service to those industries within 5 miles of a WWTP with a combined reclaimed<br />

water demand of 1 mgd or more could be provided at about $1.00/1000 gallons or<br />

less, making it competitive with potable supplies.<br />

The base system provides a water quality that could possibly be suitable <strong>for</strong> a oncethrough<br />

cooling process or sand and gravel washing. It would also be sufficient <strong>for</strong><br />

irrigation of restricted areas on industrial site grounds. To meet the anticipated water<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> much of Minnesota’s industrial water demand, additional treatment<br />

at the WWTP or the industry site will be required. Given the high hardness in<br />

Minnesota’s source waters and high salt concentrations in wastewater (elevated<br />

chloride concentrations have been attributed to home softening system brine<br />

discharges), additional treatment may be necessary <strong>for</strong> the intended industrial water<br />

use. The treatment costs <strong>for</strong> a range of industrial uses are the subject of Section 5.6.<br />

34 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM3-Component&Costs_0707

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!