Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

archive.leg.state.mn.us
from archive.leg.state.mn.us More from this publisher
17.08.2013 Views

5.4 Base Water Reuse System Costs 5.4.1 Treatment TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Section 3.3.3 defined the base water reuse system to be an advanced secondary WWTP with disinfection facilities. It was assumed the facility had all the required facilities to meet the base level water quality established except for additional disinfection system equipment to disinfect year-round and provide a residual disinfectant for transmission. The base system disinfects to a total coliform limit of 23/100 ml and provides a 2.5 mg/L chlorine dose for residual. Newdisinfection equipment and the associated O&M costs are the only additional treatment system requirements identified for the base water reuse treatment system. The chlorine doses and disinfection assumptions identified in Section 3.3.3 are applied to all WWTPs regardless of the disinfection process. The cost model reflects having the facilities sized to meet the highest dose requirement (with a peaking factor considered for feed rate ranges). As shown in Table 14, the capital cost for disinfection is estimated as a base system cost plus a cost per gallon/day (gpd) to account for the incremental costs of metering pumps, tank storage, and building footprint. Table 14. Base System: Sodium Hypochlorite Capital Costs Capacity, mgd Construction Cost Base, $ ($/gpd) ≤ 0.5 $100,000 $0.10 0.5 - 5 $150,000 $0.03 >5 $250,000 $0.02 The O&M costs for the sodium hypochlorite system in the cost model include the chemical cost at $0.70/gallon of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite and equipment maintenance. The electrical costs are considered negligible. 5.4.2 Storage Storage is not considered in the base water reuse system. 5.4.3 Pump Station The cost model uses a flow-based cost equation, as shown in Table 15, to determine the pump station costs. The pump station cost equations reflect some economy of scale and are based on Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) estimates prepared for other projects (CDM, 2006 & 2003). These cost equations were checked with data compiled by MCES in review of lift station costs (MCES, 2006a & 2006b) and were found to be representative and on the conservative side. The capacity shown is for the annual average flow and assumes a peaking factor of 3 for the maximum flow pumped. Craddock Consulting Engineers 31 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Table 15. Pump Station Unit Costs Capacity, mgd Capital Cost, $/gpd ≤ 0.5 0.61 0.5 to 7.5 0.49 ≥ 7.5 0.40 Source: CDM, 2006 & 2003 5.4.4 Transmission Piping Transmission piping is a significant cost of the base system. For this study, the cost model was developed to account for a range of transmission main sizes and lengths, providing a family of cost curves. These cost curves, based on flow and pipe length, allow one to estimate the cost of transmission piping from a WWTP to an industry. Capital Costs The transmission system is a force main from the WWTP to an industry or a group of industries. Pipe materials for reclaimed water mains are typically polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC) , DR 18, Class 150, AWWA Specifications C-900 and C-905 with push-on joints, or ductile iron pipe (DIP), Class 51, with push-on joints and cement lining on the inside and a bituminous coating (16 mils DFT) on the outside. For this cost model, it is assumed that all mains will be PVC, DR 18, Class 150 for pipe 24 inch or less in diameter and DIP Class 51 for pipe larger then 24-inch. The unit cost for materials and labor to install reclaimed water piping are summarized in Table 16. Construction and project costs are provided. The unit costs were developed from a transmission cost tool documented in Appendix B. These compare to force main interceptor costs (MCES, 2006a & 2006b) and water distribution system costs (Gumerman et al, 1992). The reclaimed water transmission piping is sized to convey the peak hour demand and to maintain a target velocity at the peak hour demand of 5 to 7 feet per second (fps). A peaking factor of 3.0 (peak hour/annual average) is assumed for this study. It is recognized that peak hour requirements can be much higher for some industries, particularly with batch or shift related process activity. A peaking factor of 3.0 assumes that there is a main pipeline with laterals to multiple facilities and peak flows of the various industries do not all coincide. An overall minimum target pressure of 40 pound per square inch (psi) was assumed at the delivery point. This is a pressure that is suitable for most cooling water systems (one of the largest potential uses of reclaimed water for Minnesota’s industries). The annual average day reclaimed water demand evaluated with this cost model ranges from 0.1 to 30 mgd. Regression analysis was performed to find the best fit line to estimate pipeline capital costs for a given flow at given pipe lengths. Appendix B provides the details of these analyses. 32 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

Table 15. Pump Station Unit Costs<br />

Capacity, mgd Capital Cost, $/gpd<br />

≤ 0.5 0.61<br />

0.5 to 7.5 0.49<br />

≥ 7.5 0.40<br />

Source: CDM, 2006 & 2003<br />

5.4.4 Transmission Piping<br />

Transmission piping is a significant cost of the base system. For this study, the cost<br />

model was developed to account <strong>for</strong> a range of transmission main sizes and lengths,<br />

providing a family of cost curves. These cost curves, based on flow and pipe length,<br />

allow one to estimate the cost of transmission piping from a WWTP to an industry.<br />

Capital Costs<br />

The transmission system is a <strong>for</strong>ce main from the WWTP to an industry or a group of<br />

industries. Pipe materials <strong>for</strong> reclaimed water mains are typically polyvinyl chloride<br />

pipe (PVC) , DR 18, Class 150, AWWA Specifications C-900 and C-905 with push-on<br />

joints, or ductile iron pipe (DIP), Class 51, with push-on joints and cement lining on<br />

the inside and a bituminous coating (16 mils DFT) on the outside. For this cost model,<br />

it is assumed that all mains will be PVC, DR 18, Class 150 <strong>for</strong> pipe 24 inch or less in<br />

diameter and DIP Class 51 <strong>for</strong> pipe larger then 24-inch.<br />

The unit cost <strong>for</strong> materials and labor to install reclaimed water piping are summarized<br />

in Table 16. Construction and project costs are provided. The unit costs were<br />

developed from a transmission cost tool documented in Appendix B. These compare<br />

to <strong>for</strong>ce main interceptor costs (MCES, 2006a & 2006b) and water distribution system<br />

costs (Gumerman et al, 1992).<br />

The reclaimed water transmission piping is sized to convey the peak hour demand<br />

and to maintain a target velocity at the peak hour demand of 5 to 7 feet per second<br />

(fps). A peaking factor of 3.0 (peak hour/annual average) is assumed <strong>for</strong> this study. It<br />

is recognized that peak hour requirements can be much higher <strong>for</strong> some industries,<br />

particularly with batch or shift related process activity. A peaking factor of 3.0<br />

assumes that there is a main pipeline with laterals to multiple facilities and peak flows<br />

of the various industries do not all coincide.<br />

An overall minimum target pressure of 40 pound per square inch (psi) was assumed<br />

at the delivery point. This is a pressure that is suitable <strong>for</strong> most cooling water systems<br />

(one of the largest potential uses of reclaimed water <strong>for</strong> Minnesota’s industries).<br />

The annual average day reclaimed water demand evaluated with this cost model<br />

ranges from 0.1 to 30 mgd. Regression analysis was per<strong>for</strong>med to find the best fit line<br />

to estimate pipeline capital costs <strong>for</strong> a given flow at given pipe lengths. Appendix B<br />

provides the details of these analyses.<br />

32 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM3-Component&Costs_0707

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!