Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Sodium hypochlorite feed systems provide a unit process that can meet the three disinfection system improvement requirements: to meet a year-round disinfectant, provide a higher level of disinfection, and maintain a residual in the transmission system. A conservative assumption is made that all WWTPs will require new equipment for application of sodium hypochlorite. It is assumed that the chlorine dose can be elevated sufficiently to meet the disinfection requirements without the need for additional detention time (new contact tanks). Chlorine doses were assumed as follows for the two annual operating practices and residual disinfection: April-October months with disinfection practiced by Minnesota WWTPs, where chlorination provides incremental disinfection from the NPDES pathogen limit to the reclaimed water pathogen limit. November-March months with no disinfection practiced by Minnesota WWTPs to provide disinfection to the reclaimed water pathogen limit. A chlorine dose of 2.5 mg/L was selected to achieve adequate residual through the transmission system. This is a dose commonly used by reclaimed systems across the country. Chlorination practices at MCES facilities and facilities with reuse systems were reviewed to identify chlorine doses for existing systems to meet NPDES permit limits and to meet a variety of state reclaimed water criteria. For MCES facilities, average chlorine doses to meet NPDES discharge limits range from 2-4 mg/L with peak demands requiring 6 mg/L of chlorine. A reclaimed system in Cary, North Carolina reported the use of an 8 mg/L dose to meet pathogen kill and residual disinfection requirements. Use of the Refined Collins-Selleck Model to estimate chlorine dosages for disinfection of a nitrified secondary effluent (White, 1999) to meet a 23/100 ml total coliform limit indicates that for a contact time of 15 minutes (the contact tank design criteria typically used in Minnesota), a dose of 4-15 mg/L is required depending on the nitrification process (ammonia at concentrations from 0.5 – 2 mg/L). For this study, it is assumed that a chlorine dose of 6.5 mg/L applied to an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is required to meet a total coliform limit of 23/100 ml. For the disinfection season months of April through October it is assumed that WWTPs have a disinfection process equivalent to a chlorination system with an average dose of 3 mg/L. Therefore, an additional 3.5 mg/L chlorine is required to meet the more stringent reclaimed water pathogen limit from April to October. When the 2.5 mg/L chlorine dose for disinfection residual is included, the chlorine doses are as follows: April-October (7 months): 3.5 mg/L + 2.5 mg/L = 6 mg/L November-March (5 months): 6.5 mg/L + 3.5 mg/L = 9 mg/L Average Annual (based on weighted average, rounded) = 7 mg/L Craddock Consulting Engineers 21 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707
TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use 3.4 Selection of Water Reuse Treatment Technologies for Specific Industrial Water Uses 3.4.1 Factors to Consider There are a host of factors to consider in selecting a treatment process train for water reuse applications. The main factors have been discussed in this document and were used to define the base level water quality and base WWTP processes, including: Water reuse quality goals Effluent wastewater characteristics Type of water reuse application (purpose of water supply) The other factors to consider for specific applications are those typical of any planning study: Integration with existing facility processes, hydraulics, and site conditions Future facility or other service area expansions and proximity and treatment requirements for water reuse applications Process flexibility (for new and existing processes) Environmental issues Operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements including energy, chemicals, labor, automation, laboratory, and general maintenance. 3.4.2 Technologies by Target Constituents Section 3.2.1 presented the treatment processes typically used to produce different levels of quality for water reuse applications. Table 7 lists these processes and identifies the specific categories of constituents they remove. The base WWTP defined for this study removes suspended solids, dissolved organic matter, ammonianitrogen, phosphorus, and pathogens (advanced secondary treatment). This supply may be adequate for some industries without additional treatment. The next level of treatment is usually filtration for consistent disinfection practices and/or additional particulate removal. Filtration is required by Title 22 for water used in cooling towers, or other applications with the potential for human contact. Particulate matter includes: suspended solids, colloidal, and/or organic matter and the related phosphorus (cell content). Filtration reduces particulates, including pathogens (bacteria, protozoan cysts, and oocysts), and also improves the disinfection process by removing particles that shield pathogens from the disinfectant (chlorine, UV, ozone). The next level of treatment will typically require some degree of dissolved constituent removal or additional nutrient removal. Hardness, related salts, metals, silica, and color were some of the constituents identified in Table 2 that required limited concentrations for various industrial uses. The treatment technology selected will depend on the exact constituents and amount to be removed, as well as the other processes used for the main WWTP and reclamation-specific processes. 22 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707
- Page 342 and 343: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 344 and 345: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 346 and 347: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 348 and 349: Exhibit D Metropolitan (Metro) WWTP
- Page 350 and 351: MCES Metropolitan Plant Final Efflu
- Page 352 and 353: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 354 and 355: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 356 and 357: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 358 and 359: MCES Seneca Plant Final Effluent Sa
- Page 360 and 361: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 362 and 363: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 364 and 365: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 366 and 367: Metropolitan Council Recycling Trea
- Page 368 and 369: Section 5 - Costs Table of Contents
- Page 370 and 371: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 372 and 373: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 374 and 375: WWTP 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 1 Treatmen
- Page 376 and 377: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 378 and 379: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 380 and 381: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 382: o Synthetic medium o Two-stage Surf
- Page 385 and 386: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 387 and 388: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 389 and 390: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 391: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 395 and 396: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 397 and 398: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 399 and 400: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 401 and 402: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 403 and 404: Table 13 WATER REUSE SYSTEM COST OF
- Page 405 and 406: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 407 and 408: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 409 and 410: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 1.00
- Page 411 and 412: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 413 and 414: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 415 and 416: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 417 and 418: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 419 and 420: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallons 8.0
- Page 421 and 422: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 423 and 424: Appendix A Water Reuse Regulatory E
- Page 425 and 426: Table A-1. 2000 California Water Re
- Page 427 and 428: California Department of Health Ser
- Page 429 and 430: Other Media Type Filters Fuzzy Filt
- Page 431 and 432: Appendix B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Rec
- Page 433 and 434: Appendix B Reclaimed Water Transmis
- Page 435 and 436: Exhibit 1 Transmission Main Cost To
- Page 437 and 438: Pipe Installation Data (DR 18 PVC P
- Page 439 and 440: Equipment Costs (with O&P) Item Des
- Page 441 and 442: Water Reuse Pipe Line Construction
TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />
<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
3.4 Selection of <strong>Water</strong> Reuse Treatment Technologies <strong>for</strong><br />
Specific <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong>s<br />
3.4.1 Factors to Consider<br />
There are a host of factors to consider in selecting a treatment process train <strong>for</strong> water<br />
reuse applications. The main factors have been discussed in this document and were<br />
used to define the base level water quality and base WWTP processes, including:<br />
<strong>Water</strong> reuse quality goals<br />
Effluent wastewater characteristics<br />
Type of water reuse application (purpose of water supply)<br />
The other factors to consider <strong>for</strong> specific applications are those typical of any planning<br />
study:<br />
Integration with existing facility processes, hydraulics, and site conditions<br />
Future facility or other service area expansions and proximity and treatment<br />
requirements <strong>for</strong> water reuse applications<br />
Process flexibility (<strong>for</strong> new and existing processes)<br />
Environmental issues<br />
Operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements including energy, chemicals,<br />
labor, automation, laboratory, and general maintenance.<br />
3.4.2 Technologies by Target Constituents<br />
Section 3.2.1 presented the treatment processes typically used to produce different<br />
levels of quality <strong>for</strong> water reuse applications. Table 7 lists these processes and<br />
identifies the specific categories of constituents they remove. The base WWTP defined<br />
<strong>for</strong> this study removes suspended solids, dissolved organic matter, ammonianitrogen,<br />
phosphorus, and pathogens (advanced secondary treatment). This supply<br />
may be adequate <strong>for</strong> some industries without additional treatment.<br />
The next level of treatment is usually filtration <strong>for</strong> consistent disinfection practices<br />
and/or additional particulate removal. Filtration is required by Title 22 <strong>for</strong> water used<br />
in cooling towers, or other applications with the potential <strong>for</strong> human contact.<br />
Particulate matter includes: suspended solids, colloidal, and/or organic matter and<br />
the related phosphorus (cell content). Filtration reduces particulates, including<br />
pathogens (bacteria, protozoan cysts, and oocysts), and also improves the disinfection<br />
process by removing particles that shield pathogens from the disinfectant (chlorine,<br />
UV, ozone).<br />
The next level of treatment will typically require some degree of dissolved constituent<br />
removal or additional nutrient removal. Hardness, related salts, metals, silica, and<br />
color were some of the constituents identified in Table 2 that required limited<br />
concentrations <strong>for</strong> various industrial uses. The treatment technology selected will<br />
depend on the exact constituents and amount to be removed, as well as the other<br />
processes used <strong>for</strong> the main WWTP and reclamation-specific processes.<br />
22 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
TM3-Component&Costs_0707