Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Heavy Metals Removal: Industrial processes have historically used ion exchange to recover heavy metals. A variety of natural an synthetic resins are available with selectivity for specific metals. Total Dissolved Solids Removal: Anionic and cationic exchange units used in a series can be used to remove TDS or demineralize the water. Reduction of Organics: Ion exchange can be used to remove the highly ionized organics in the water. Specifically prepared resins have been used to reduce TOC levels by 50 percent. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) Advanced oxidation processes destroy trace constituents that are not completely oxidized by conventional oxidation processes. There are a host of processes and groupings of processes that have been used, principally in the drinking water industry and research stages, to handle specific contaminants and the emerging contaminants of concern. These processes are all applicable to treatment of water for reuse. The primary AOPs that have application to water reuse systems include: Hydrogen Peroxide/Ultraviolet Light (H2O2/UV) Hydrogen Peroxide/Ozone (H2O2/Ozone) Ozone/Ultraviolet Light (Ozone/UV) The UV processes are the most promising for Minnesota application, where UV radiation is becoming amore common form of disinfection. UV facilities could be retrofitted or planned for new construction to handle any specific removal of trace constituents. The use of AOPs will be a very site-specific application or is a consideration for future management of trace constituents. The technology is identified in this study to emphasize that applications do exist and research is ongoing to prepare for handling the treatment of these constituents. 3.2.6 Disinfection (Microorganism Removal/Inactivation) Most Minnesota WWTPs disinfect with chlorine or UV. The main compounds used for chlorination are gaseous chlorine (Cl2) and liquid sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Because of safety concerns and regulatory requirements, many WWTPs have moved from chlorine gas to sodium hypochlorite. Other disinfectants (not emphasized in this study) include ozone, chlorine dioxide, and calcium hypochlorite (for smaller WWTPs). Membranes also provide a barrier to microorganisms and reduce or can potentially remove the need for chemical or UV disinfection. Given the elevated potential for human contact, disinfection is an essential part of the process train in treating water for reuse. Disinfection requirements for reuse under the Title 22 criteria are greater than for discharge to the receiving stream under most Minnesota NPDES permits. Specific needs for Minnesota’s wastewater treatment Craddock Consulting Engineers 17 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707
TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use facilities to achieve microbial limits to protect public health are discussed under Section 3.3. 3.3 Municipal WWTP Processes and Water Quality 3.3.1 Overview Assumptions were made to define a starting point for treatment requirements to meet regulatory and industrial specific uses of a reclaimed water supply. For this project, it is assumed that the WWTP is supplying an effluent from a secondary treatment system. The secondary system is an activated sludge system with nitrification and phosphorus removal, defined for this project as ‘advanced secondary treatment’. While some Minnesota municipal facilities may have total nitrogen removal or the capability, the majority do not. Hence, in this study only ammonia nitrogen removal is assumed under the term ‘advanced secondary treatment’ or when the term nutrient removal is used. The majority of Minnesota’s larger WWTPs have an advanced secondary treatment process or will have this capability as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are developed across the state. New facilities and major expansions permitted in the state are anticipated to have nutrient limits that would dictate this assumed process train. In addition, because one of the largest and most likely industrial uses of reclaimed water is for cooling water, which requires minimal levels of phosphorus and ammonia – use of an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is an optimum starting point. This assumption does not exclude consideration of other types of wastewater treatment facilities for water reclamation, such as fixed film systems (trickling filters and rotating biological contactors), stabilization ponds, chemical/physical package systems, or natural systems (wetland treatment). However, it is likely that additional processes would need to be added to meet the water quality requirements of a specific industry and the regulatory requirements. 3.3.2 Base WWTP Definition and Effluent Quality A “base level” water quality produced by a “base WWTP” was assumed for purposes of estimating costs of service for a municipality to supply an industry with reclaimed water. The base level reclaimed water quality is defined for this study as a hard water that meets regulatory standards for non-contact industrial water uses. The base level water quality is assumed to have the constituent concentrations listed in Table 6, as typical of an advanced secondary wastewater facility effluent. This list includes constituents in most Minnesota NPDES permits (for discharge to a receiving water), those required by the California Title 22 regulations, and others that relate to specific industrial water uses, such as total dissolved solids (TDS). If a facility has advanced secondary treatment, the first seven constituents listed in Table 6 (through fecal coliform) are expected to be included in the facility’s NPDES permit, with the exception of nitrate. The concentrations listed for these seven parameters are considered “typical” effluent concentrations, based on a review of Minnesota WWTP discharge reports and typical operations of similar secondary WWTPs across the U.S. The BOD and TSS concentrations listed are typically less than 18 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707
- Page 337 and 338: Date Day of Wk MCES Blue Lake Plant
- Page 340 and 341: MCES Empire Plant Final Effluent Sa
- Page 342 and 343: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 344 and 345: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 346 and 347: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 348 and 349: Exhibit D Metropolitan (Metro) WWTP
- Page 350 and 351: MCES Metropolitan Plant Final Efflu
- Page 352 and 353: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 354 and 355: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 356 and 357: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 358 and 359: MCES Seneca Plant Final Effluent Sa
- Page 360 and 361: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 362 and 363: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 364 and 365: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 366 and 367: Metropolitan Council Recycling Trea
- Page 368 and 369: Section 5 - Costs Table of Contents
- Page 370 and 371: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 372 and 373: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 374 and 375: WWTP 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 1 Treatmen
- Page 376 and 377: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 378 and 379: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 380 and 381: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 382: o Synthetic medium o Two-stage Surf
- Page 385 and 386: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 387: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 391 and 392: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 393 and 394: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 395 and 396: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 397 and 398: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 399 and 400: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 401 and 402: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 403 and 404: Table 13 WATER REUSE SYSTEM COST OF
- Page 405 and 406: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 407 and 408: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 409 and 410: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallon 1.00
- Page 411 and 412: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 413 and 414: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 415 and 416: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 417 and 418: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 419 and 420: Cost of Service, $/1000 gallons 8.0
- Page 421 and 422: TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Com
- Page 423 and 424: Appendix A Water Reuse Regulatory E
- Page 425 and 426: Table A-1. 2000 California Water Re
- Page 427 and 428: California Department of Health Ser
- Page 429 and 430: Other Media Type Filters Fuzzy Filt
- Page 431 and 432: Appendix B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Rec
- Page 433 and 434: Appendix B Reclaimed Water Transmis
- Page 435 and 436: Exhibit 1 Transmission Main Cost To
- Page 437 and 438: Pipe Installation Data (DR 18 PVC P
TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />
<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
facilities to achieve microbial limits to protect public health are discussed under<br />
Section 3.3.<br />
3.3 <strong>Municipal</strong> WWTP Processes and <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />
3.3.1 Overview<br />
Assumptions were made to define a starting point <strong>for</strong> treatment requirements to meet<br />
regulatory and industrial specific uses of a reclaimed water supply. For this project, it<br />
is assumed that the WWTP is supplying an effluent from a secondary treatment<br />
system. The secondary system is an activated sludge system with nitrification and<br />
phosphorus removal, defined <strong>for</strong> this project as ‘advanced secondary treatment’.<br />
While some Minnesota municipal facilities may have total nitrogen removal or the<br />
capability, the majority do not. Hence, in this study only ammonia nitrogen removal<br />
is assumed under the term ‘advanced secondary treatment’ or when the term nutrient<br />
removal is used.<br />
The majority of Minnesota’s larger WWTPs have an advanced secondary treatment<br />
process or will have this capability as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are<br />
developed across the state. New facilities and major expansions permitted in the state<br />
are anticipated to have nutrient limits that would dictate this assumed process train.<br />
In addition, because one of the largest and most likely industrial uses of reclaimed<br />
water is <strong>for</strong> cooling water, which requires minimal levels of phosphorus and<br />
ammonia – use of an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is an optimum<br />
starting point. This assumption does not exclude consideration of other types of<br />
wastewater treatment facilities <strong>for</strong> water reclamation, such as fixed film systems<br />
(trickling filters and rotating biological contactors), stabilization ponds,<br />
chemical/physical package systems, or natural systems (wetland treatment).<br />
However, it is likely that additional processes would need to be added to meet the<br />
water quality requirements of a specific industry and the regulatory requirements.<br />
3.3.2 Base WWTP Definition and Effluent Quality<br />
A “base level” water quality produced by a “base WWTP” was assumed <strong>for</strong> purposes<br />
of estimating costs of service <strong>for</strong> a municipality to supply an industry with reclaimed<br />
water. The base level reclaimed water quality is defined <strong>for</strong> this study as a hard water<br />
that meets regulatory standards <strong>for</strong> non-contact industrial water uses. The base level<br />
water quality is assumed to have the constituent concentrations listed in Table 6, as<br />
typical of an advanced secondary wastewater facility effluent. This list includes<br />
constituents in most Minnesota NPDES permits (<strong>for</strong> discharge to a receiving water),<br />
those required by the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Title 22 regulations, and others that relate to specific<br />
industrial water uses, such as total dissolved solids (TDS).<br />
If a facility has advanced secondary treatment, the first seven constituents listed in<br />
Table 6 (through fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m) are expected to be included in the facility’s NPDES<br />
permit, with the exception of nitrate. The concentrations listed <strong>for</strong> these seven<br />
parameters are considered “typical” effluent concentrations, based on a review of<br />
Minnesota WWTP discharge reports and typical operations of similar secondary<br />
WWTPs across the U.S. The BOD and TSS concentrations listed are typically less than<br />
18 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
TM3-Component&Costs_0707