Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

archive.leg.state.mn.us
from archive.leg.state.mn.us More from this publisher
17.08.2013 Views

TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Heavy Metals Removal: Industrial processes have historically used ion exchange to recover heavy metals. A variety of natural an synthetic resins are available with selectivity for specific metals. Total Dissolved Solids Removal: Anionic and cationic exchange units used in a series can be used to remove TDS or demineralize the water. Reduction of Organics: Ion exchange can be used to remove the highly ionized organics in the water. Specifically prepared resins have been used to reduce TOC levels by 50 percent. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) Advanced oxidation processes destroy trace constituents that are not completely oxidized by conventional oxidation processes. There are a host of processes and groupings of processes that have been used, principally in the drinking water industry and research stages, to handle specific contaminants and the emerging contaminants of concern. These processes are all applicable to treatment of water for reuse. The primary AOPs that have application to water reuse systems include: Hydrogen Peroxide/Ultraviolet Light (H2O2/UV) Hydrogen Peroxide/Ozone (H2O2/Ozone) Ozone/Ultraviolet Light (Ozone/UV) The UV processes are the most promising for Minnesota application, where UV radiation is becoming amore common form of disinfection. UV facilities could be retrofitted or planned for new construction to handle any specific removal of trace constituents. The use of AOPs will be a very site-specific application or is a consideration for future management of trace constituents. The technology is identified in this study to emphasize that applications do exist and research is ongoing to prepare for handling the treatment of these constituents. 3.2.6 Disinfection (Microorganism Removal/Inactivation) Most Minnesota WWTPs disinfect with chlorine or UV. The main compounds used for chlorination are gaseous chlorine (Cl2) and liquid sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Because of safety concerns and regulatory requirements, many WWTPs have moved from chlorine gas to sodium hypochlorite. Other disinfectants (not emphasized in this study) include ozone, chlorine dioxide, and calcium hypochlorite (for smaller WWTPs). Membranes also provide a barrier to microorganisms and reduce or can potentially remove the need for chemical or UV disinfection. Given the elevated potential for human contact, disinfection is an essential part of the process train in treating water for reuse. Disinfection requirements for reuse under the Title 22 criteria are greater than for discharge to the receiving stream under most Minnesota NPDES permits. Specific needs for Minnesota’s wastewater treatment Craddock Consulting Engineers 17 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled Wastewater System Components and Costs Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use facilities to achieve microbial limits to protect public health are discussed under Section 3.3. 3.3 Municipal WWTP Processes and Water Quality 3.3.1 Overview Assumptions were made to define a starting point for treatment requirements to meet regulatory and industrial specific uses of a reclaimed water supply. For this project, it is assumed that the WWTP is supplying an effluent from a secondary treatment system. The secondary system is an activated sludge system with nitrification and phosphorus removal, defined for this project as ‘advanced secondary treatment’. While some Minnesota municipal facilities may have total nitrogen removal or the capability, the majority do not. Hence, in this study only ammonia nitrogen removal is assumed under the term ‘advanced secondary treatment’ or when the term nutrient removal is used. The majority of Minnesota’s larger WWTPs have an advanced secondary treatment process or will have this capability as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are developed across the state. New facilities and major expansions permitted in the state are anticipated to have nutrient limits that would dictate this assumed process train. In addition, because one of the largest and most likely industrial uses of reclaimed water is for cooling water, which requires minimal levels of phosphorus and ammonia – use of an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is an optimum starting point. This assumption does not exclude consideration of other types of wastewater treatment facilities for water reclamation, such as fixed film systems (trickling filters and rotating biological contactors), stabilization ponds, chemical/physical package systems, or natural systems (wetland treatment). However, it is likely that additional processes would need to be added to meet the water quality requirements of a specific industry and the regulatory requirements. 3.3.2 Base WWTP Definition and Effluent Quality A “base level” water quality produced by a “base WWTP” was assumed for purposes of estimating costs of service for a municipality to supply an industry with reclaimed water. The base level reclaimed water quality is defined for this study as a hard water that meets regulatory standards for non-contact industrial water uses. The base level water quality is assumed to have the constituent concentrations listed in Table 6, as typical of an advanced secondary wastewater facility effluent. This list includes constituents in most Minnesota NPDES permits (for discharge to a receiving water), those required by the California Title 22 regulations, and others that relate to specific industrial water uses, such as total dissolved solids (TDS). If a facility has advanced secondary treatment, the first seven constituents listed in Table 6 (through fecal coliform) are expected to be included in the facility’s NPDES permit, with the exception of nitrate. The concentrations listed for these seven parameters are considered “typical” effluent concentrations, based on a review of Minnesota WWTP discharge reports and typical operations of similar secondary WWTPs across the U.S. The BOD and TSS concentrations listed are typically less than 18 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM3-Component&Costs_0707

TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

facilities to achieve microbial limits to protect public health are discussed under<br />

Section 3.3.<br />

3.3 <strong>Municipal</strong> WWTP Processes and <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />

3.3.1 Overview<br />

Assumptions were made to define a starting point <strong>for</strong> treatment requirements to meet<br />

regulatory and industrial specific uses of a reclaimed water supply. For this project, it<br />

is assumed that the WWTP is supplying an effluent from a secondary treatment<br />

system. The secondary system is an activated sludge system with nitrification and<br />

phosphorus removal, defined <strong>for</strong> this project as ‘advanced secondary treatment’.<br />

While some Minnesota municipal facilities may have total nitrogen removal or the<br />

capability, the majority do not. Hence, in this study only ammonia nitrogen removal<br />

is assumed under the term ‘advanced secondary treatment’ or when the term nutrient<br />

removal is used.<br />

The majority of Minnesota’s larger WWTPs have an advanced secondary treatment<br />

process or will have this capability as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are<br />

developed across the state. New facilities and major expansions permitted in the state<br />

are anticipated to have nutrient limits that would dictate this assumed process train.<br />

In addition, because one of the largest and most likely industrial uses of reclaimed<br />

water is <strong>for</strong> cooling water, which requires minimal levels of phosphorus and<br />

ammonia – use of an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is an optimum<br />

starting point. This assumption does not exclude consideration of other types of<br />

wastewater treatment facilities <strong>for</strong> water reclamation, such as fixed film systems<br />

(trickling filters and rotating biological contactors), stabilization ponds,<br />

chemical/physical package systems, or natural systems (wetland treatment).<br />

However, it is likely that additional processes would need to be added to meet the<br />

water quality requirements of a specific industry and the regulatory requirements.<br />

3.3.2 Base WWTP Definition and Effluent Quality<br />

A “base level” water quality produced by a “base WWTP” was assumed <strong>for</strong> purposes<br />

of estimating costs of service <strong>for</strong> a municipality to supply an industry with reclaimed<br />

water. The base level reclaimed water quality is defined <strong>for</strong> this study as a hard water<br />

that meets regulatory standards <strong>for</strong> non-contact industrial water uses. The base level<br />

water quality is assumed to have the constituent concentrations listed in Table 6, as<br />

typical of an advanced secondary wastewater facility effluent. This list includes<br />

constituents in most Minnesota NPDES permits (<strong>for</strong> discharge to a receiving water),<br />

those required by the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Title 22 regulations, and others that relate to specific<br />

industrial water uses, such as total dissolved solids (TDS).<br />

If a facility has advanced secondary treatment, the first seven constituents listed in<br />

Table 6 (through fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m) are expected to be included in the facility’s NPDES<br />

permit, with the exception of nitrate. The concentrations listed <strong>for</strong> these seven<br />

parameters are considered “typical” effluent concentrations, based on a review of<br />

Minnesota WWTP discharge reports and typical operations of similar secondary<br />

WWTPs across the U.S. The BOD and TSS concentrations listed are typically less than<br />

18 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM3-Component&Costs_0707

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!