Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use As shown in Table 2, there are several constituents that are routinely analyzed by Council, typically as part of their NPDES Permit requirements. The sampling program funded under this project included only those constituents not routinely sampled at each WWTP, listed in Table 3. Table 2. Constituents to Characterize in Sampling Program Constituent Unit Alkalinity (as CaCO3) mg/L Aluminum (Al) mg/L Calcium (Ca) mg/L Routinely Sampled (x=yes) Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD) mg/L X Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/L X Chloride (Cl) mg/L Color units Dissolved Oxygen (DO) mg/L X E. Coli - Fecal Coliform No./100 ml X Iron (Fe) mg/L Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/L Bicarbonate (HCO3) mg/L Magnesium (Mg) mg/L Manganese (Mn) mg/L Ammonia (NH3) mg/L X Nitrate (NO3) mg/L X Orthophosphate (PO4) mg/L X Phosphorus (total: TP) mg/L X pH units X Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) mg/L Sulfate (SO4) mg/L Total Coliform No./100 ml Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) mg/L Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) mg/L X Turbidity NTU 4 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook TM2-Sampling_0707.doc
TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Craddock Consulting Engineers 5 In Association with CDM & James Crook TM2-Sampling_0707.doc Table 3. Sampling Program Constituents Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Aluminum (Al) Bicarbonate (HCO3) Calcium (Ca) Chloride (Cl) Color E. Coli Iron (Fe) Hardness (as CaCO3) Magnesium (Mg) Manganese (Mn) Silicondioxide (SiO2) Sulfate (SO4) Total Coliform Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Turbidity 2.2 Sample Type, Collection, and Location The Council handled all sampling and laboratory analyses. Samples were collected at the same location used to characterize the final effluent for permit monitoring. The routinely collected daily sample at the Metro Plant was used for this project’s sampling program. An additional sampler was required at the other three plants because there is an insufficient sample volume routinely collected at those facilities for the additional analyses required by this sampling program. The samplers collected flow-weighted 24-hour composite samples, except at the Empire WWTP, which provided a time-weighted composite sample. The Council’s Industrial Waste department staff setup and managed the sampler operation. Operators at each plant collected this program’s samples at the same time as they collected the routine effluent samples. The first sampling period included 8-15 samples collected over a three week period in late October to early November. Samples were collected on weekdays and weekends whenever routine samples were collected. After review of the Fall 2006 results it was determined that additional sampling would strengthen confidence in understanding constituent variability. A spring sampling schedule was performed: during the first three weeks of April, 8-12 samples were analyzed for the constituents listed in Table 3. All available data for the routine monitoring program were obtained for the similar time periods. The sample count varied with each plant based on the NPDES permit requirements.
- Page 264 and 265: Table 3.12c. Industries in the Miss
- Page 266 and 267: Table 3.12c. Industries in the Miss
- Page 268 and 269: Table 3.12c. Industries in the Miss
- Page 270 and 271: Table 3.12c. Industries in the Miss
- Page 272 and 273: Table 3.13a. Industrial Water Use i
- Page 274 and 275: Table 3.14a. Industrial Water Use i
- Page 276 and 277: Table 3.15a. Industrial Water Use i
- Page 278 and 279: WATER USE (MGD) WATER USE (MGD) 2.5
- Page 280 and 281: WATER USE (MGD) WATER USE (MGD) 0.8
- Page 282 and 283: Table 3.17c. Industries in the West
- Page 284 and 285: MN Permit No Facility Minnesota Mun
- Page 286 and 287: MN Permit No Facility Minnesota Mun
- Page 288 and 289: Craddock Consulting Engineers In As
- Page 290: Minnesota DNR Waters 2005 Ground-wa
- Page 294 and 295: Craddock Consulting Engineers In As
- Page 296 and 297: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 298 and 299: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 300 and 301: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 302 and 303: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 304 and 305: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 306 and 307: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 308 and 309: Permit No. Organization NAICS Code
- Page 310 and 311: Metropolitan Council Recycling Trea
- Page 312 and 313: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 316 and 317: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 318 and 319: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 320 and 321: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 322 and 323: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 324 and 325: TM2: Sampling Plan and Results Recy
- Page 326 and 327: Recommended Limits for Various Indu
- Page 328: Exhibit B Blue Lake WWTP Sampling R
- Page 331 and 332: MCES Blue Lake Plant Final Effluent
- Page 333 and 334: Date Day of Wk MCES Blue Lake Plant
- Page 335 and 336: Date Day of Wk MCES Blue Lake Plant
- Page 337 and 338: Date Day of Wk MCES Blue Lake Plant
- Page 340 and 341: MCES Empire Plant Final Effluent Sa
- Page 342 and 343: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 344 and 345: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 346 and 347: Date Day of Wk 10/24/06 Tuesday 10/
- Page 348 and 349: Exhibit D Metropolitan (Metro) WWTP
- Page 350 and 351: MCES Metropolitan Plant Final Efflu
- Page 352 and 353: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 354 and 355: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 356 and 357: Date Day of Wk 4/19/07 Thursday 4/2
- Page 358 and 359: MCES Seneca Plant Final Effluent Sa
- Page 360 and 361: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
- Page 362 and 363: Date Day of Wk 10/8/06 Sunday 10/9/
TM2: Sampling Plan and Results<br />
<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />
Craddock Consulting Engineers 5<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
TM2-Sampling_0707.doc<br />
Table 3. Sampling Program Constituents<br />
Alkalinity (as CaCO3)<br />
Aluminum (Al)<br />
Bicarbonate (HCO3)<br />
Calcium (Ca)<br />
Chloride (Cl)<br />
Color<br />
E. Coli<br />
Iron (Fe)<br />
Hardness (as CaCO3)<br />
Magnesium (Mg)<br />
Manganese (Mn)<br />
Silicondioxide (SiO2)<br />
Sulfate (SO4)<br />
Total Coli<strong>for</strong>m<br />
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)<br />
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)<br />
Turbidity<br />
2.2 Sample Type, Collection, and Location<br />
The Council handled all sampling and laboratory analyses. Samples were collected at<br />
the same location used to characterize the final effluent <strong>for</strong> permit monitoring. The<br />
routinely collected daily sample at the Metro Plant was used <strong>for</strong> this project’s<br />
sampling program. An additional sampler was required at the other three plants<br />
because there is an insufficient sample volume routinely collected at those facilities<br />
<strong>for</strong> the additional analyses required by this sampling program. The samplers collected<br />
flow-weighted 24-hour composite samples, except at the Empire WWTP, which<br />
provided a time-weighted composite sample. The Council’s <strong>Industrial</strong> Waste<br />
department staff setup and managed the sampler operation. Operators at each plant<br />
collected this program’s samples at the same time as they collected the routine<br />
effluent samples.<br />
The first sampling period included 8-15 samples collected over a three week period in<br />
late October to early November. Samples were collected on weekdays and weekends<br />
whenever routine samples were collected. After review of the Fall 2006 results it was<br />
determined that additional sampling would strengthen confidence in understanding<br />
constituent variability. A spring sampling schedule was per<strong>for</strong>med: during the first<br />
three weeks of April, 8-12 samples were analyzed <strong>for</strong> the constituents listed in Table 3.<br />
All available data <strong>for</strong> the routine monitoring program were obtained <strong>for</strong> the similar<br />
time periods. The sample count varied with each plant based on the NPDES permit<br />
requirements.