Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential Industrial Reuse Demands Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-21 In Association with CDM & James Crook WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc watershed varies from low to high. Surficial sand aquifers have shown nitrate contamination. The Minnesota River watershed dischargers will be affected by the TMDL for the Minnesota River and the downstream Lake Pepin TMDL. The agricultural practices and natural characteristics of this watershed have contributed to making it a significant contributor to phosphorus and solids loadings at Lake Pepin. This watershed will be an integral part of the TMDL process and receiving stream discharge limits could push some municipalities to consider wastewater reuse. Table 3.11b. WWTPs in the Minnesota River Watershed Design 2005 Ann Flow as % Capacity, Avg Flow, of Design Facility Name mgd mgd Capacity Fairmont WWTP 3.9 1.595 41% Granite Falls WWTP 1.111 0.477 43% Madelia WWTP 1.31 0.907 69% Mankato WWTP 11.25 6.861 61% Marshall WWTP 4.5 2.5180 56% Met Council - Blue Lake WWTP 37 28.420 77% Met Council - Seneca WWTP 38 23.353 60% Montevideo WWTP 3.0 1.083 36% New Prague WWTP 1.378 0.662 48% New Ulm WWTP 6.77 2.582 38% St James WWTP 2.960 1.032 35% St Peter WWTP 4.0 1.170 29% Waseca WWTP 3.5 1.580 45% Wells Easton Minnesota Lake WWTP 1.088 0.516 47% Winnebago WWTP 1.7 0.592 35% Total Source: MPCA, 2005 122.47 73.348 60% Note: Willmar WWTP discharges into the Minnesota River, but the facility resides in the Mississippi River-Headwaters. It is included with Mississippi River-Headwaters watershed summary. Mississippi River-Headwaters (Upper) Industrial Water Use The Mississippi River-Headwaters or Upper Mississippi River watershed has the most diverse set of potential reuse industries, as shown in Table 3.12a and Figures 3.12a and 3.12b. Cooling water, mainly for once-through systems for steam power and nuclear power facilities, is the dominant use of water by industries, totaling about 800 mgd. The largest water users, outside of the power generation industry, are for pulp and paper processing at Blandin Paper Company, Grand Rapids and International Paper Company, St. Cloud. However, since both use Mississippi River water and the municipality’s use river water as their source, there is no added benefit to the ground water supply systems in those communities if they were reclaimed water customers. Agricultural processing industries were the largest user of ground water, using 6.5 mgd in 2004. Metal processing, petroleum/chemical processing, and smaller pulp & paper facilities withdrew around 2 mgd each from the local aquifers in 2004.
Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential Industrial Reuse Demands Table 3.11c. Industries in the Minnesota River Watershed Within 4 Miles of a WWTP Industry Name Source* 2004 Water Use, mgd Distance to WWTP, miles Closest WWTP Industry Category FAIRMONT FOODS OF MINNESOTA G 0.032 1.4 Fairmont Agricultural Processing FAIRMONT, CITY OF S 0.409 1 Fairmont STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 0.008 1 Granite Falls STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH CENEX HARVEST STATES COOPERATIVES G 3.578 2 Mankato Agricultural Processing WIS-PAK OF MANKATO INC G 0.371 2.5 Mankato Agricultural Processing VETTER STONE CO G 0.200 3.9 Mankato Mine Processing MINNESOTA QUARRIES INC G 0.117 1 Mankato Sand and Gravel Washing NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.000 1 Mankato STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 21.581 1 Mankato STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER METC- Blue CORP G 0.067 2.0 Lake Non-Metallic Processing GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES METC- Blue OF MN G 0.002 2.7 Lake Non-Metallic Processing INLAND PAPERBOARD & METC- Blue PACKAGING INC G 0.050 2.0 Lake METC- Blue Pulp and Paper Processing NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.000 1.0 Lake METC- Blue STEAM POWER COOLING - WET TOWER SHAKOPEE GRAVEL INC G 0.001 2.5 Lake Sand and Gravel Washing COCA-COLA BOTTLING MW G 0.706 3.7 METC- Seneca Agricultural Processing CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR G 0.853 2.5 METC- Seneca Metal Processing NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 295.460 2.5 METC- Seneca STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.112 2.5 METC- Seneca STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO G 0.321 2.9 METC- Seneca Agricultural Processing POLARFAB LLC G 0.265 2.4 METC- Seneca Non-Metallic Processing SURMODICS INC G 0.003 4.0 METC- Seneca Industrial Processing ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER METC- Blue CORP G 0.067 2.0 Lake Non-Metallic Processing GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES METC- Blue OF MN G 0.002 2.7 Lake Non-Metallic Processing INLAND PAPERBOARD & METC- Blue PACKAGING INC ASSOCIATED MILK G 0.050 2.0 Lake Pulp and Paper Processing PRODUCERS G 0.000 1 New Prague Agricultural Processing AUGUST SCHELL BREWERY NEW ULM QUARTZITE G 0.000 1.5 New Ulm Agricultural Processing QUARRY SOUTHERN MINNESOTA S 0.042 1.3 New Ulm Mine Processing CONSTRUCTION CO G 0.150 4 St Peter Sand and Gravel Washing UNIMIN MINNESOTA CORP S 0.000 2.5 St Peter Sand and Gravel Washing CORN PLUS G 0.136 1 Winnebago Petroleum - Chemical Processing * G=Ground Water; S=Surface Water Source: MDNR, 2004 3-22 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc
- Page 95 and 96: Table 2.4. Examples of State Water
- Page 97 and 98: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 99 and 100: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 101 and 102: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 103 and 104: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 105 and 106: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 107 and 108: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 109: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 112 and 113: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 114 and 115: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 116 and 117: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 118 and 119: Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-1 I
- Page 120 and 121: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 122 and 123: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 3.6. Industrial Reuse Custom
- Page 126 and 127: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 128 and 129: Figure 3.7b. Ground Water Availabil
- Page 130 and 131: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 132 and 133: ") Figure 3.8c. Cedar River Watersh
- Page 134 and 135: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 136 and 137: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 138 and 139: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 140 and 141: ") ") ") ") Figure 3.10c. Lower Mis
- Page 142 and 143: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 144 and 145: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 148 and 149: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 150 and 151: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 152 and 153: Figure 3.12c. Mississippi River - H
- Page 154 and 155: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 156 and 157: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 158 and 159: Figure 3.14b. Rainy River Watershed
- Page 160 and 161: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 162 and 163: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 164 and 165: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 166 and 167: ") Figure 3.16c. St. Croix River Wa
- Page 168 and 169: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 170 and 171: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 172 and 173: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 174 and 175: Figure 3.18 Metro Area Industrial R
- Page 176 and 177: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 178 and 179: G G Flying Cloud Dr !! G! G Figure
- Page 180 and 181: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 182 and 183: Figure 3.22. Rogers WWTP - Industri
- Page 184 and 185: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 186 and 187: G G G! Dodd Rd GG Figure 3.24. Rose
- Page 188 and 189: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 190 and 191: G Figure 3.26. Hastings WWTP - Indu
- Page 192 and 193: State Hwy 36 ! Figure 3.28. St. Cro
- Page 194 and 195: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
Section 3<br />
Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />
Table 3.11c. Industries in the Minnesota River <strong>Water</strong>shed Within 4 Miles of a WWTP<br />
Industry Name Source*<br />
2004<br />
<strong>Water</strong><br />
<strong>Use</strong>,<br />
mgd<br />
Distance<br />
to<br />
WWTP,<br />
miles Closest WWTP Industry Category<br />
FAIRMONT FOODS OF<br />
MINNESOTA G 0.032 1.4 Fairmont Agricultural Processing<br />
FAIRMONT, CITY OF S 0.409 1 Fairmont STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 0.008 1 Granite Falls STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
CENEX HARVEST STATES<br />
COOPERATIVES G 3.578 2 Mankato Agricultural Processing<br />
WIS-PAK OF MANKATO INC G 0.371 2.5 Mankato Agricultural Processing<br />
VETTER STONE CO G 0.200 3.9 Mankato Mine Processing<br />
MINNESOTA QUARRIES INC G 0.117 1 Mankato Sand and Gravel Washing<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.000 1 Mankato STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 21.581 1 Mankato STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER<br />
METC- Blue<br />
CORP G 0.067 2.0 Lake Non-Metallic Processing<br />
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES<br />
METC- Blue<br />
OF MN G 0.002 2.7 Lake Non-Metallic Processing<br />
INLAND PAPERBOARD &<br />
METC- Blue<br />
PACKAGING INC G 0.050 2.0 Lake<br />
METC- Blue<br />
Pulp and Paper Processing<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.000 1.0 Lake<br />
METC- Blue<br />
STEAM POWER COOLING - WET TOWER<br />
SHAKOPEE GRAVEL INC G 0.001 2.5 Lake Sand and Gravel Washing<br />
COCA-COLA BOTTLING MW G 0.706 3.7 METC- Seneca Agricultural Processing<br />
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR G 0.853 2.5 METC- Seneca Metal Processing<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY S 295.460 2.5 METC- Seneca STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
NSP CO DBA XCEL ENERGY G 0.112 2.5 METC- Seneca STEAM POWER COOLING - ONCE THROUGH<br />
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO G 0.321 2.9 METC- Seneca Agricultural Processing<br />
POLARFAB LLC G 0.265 2.4 METC- Seneca Non-Metallic Processing<br />
SURMODICS INC G 0.003 4.0 METC- Seneca <strong>Industrial</strong> Processing<br />
ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER<br />
METC- Blue<br />
CORP G 0.067 2.0 Lake Non-Metallic Processing<br />
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES<br />
METC- Blue<br />
OF MN G 0.002 2.7 Lake Non-Metallic Processing<br />
INLAND PAPERBOARD &<br />
METC- Blue<br />
PACKAGING INC<br />
ASSOCIATED MILK<br />
G 0.050 2.0 Lake Pulp and Paper Processing<br />
PRODUCERS G 0.000 1 New Prague Agricultural Processing<br />
AUGUST SCHELL BREWERY<br />
NEW ULM QUARTZITE<br />
G 0.000 1.5 New Ulm Agricultural Processing<br />
QUARRY<br />
SOUTHERN MINNESOTA<br />
S 0.042 1.3 New Ulm Mine Processing<br />
CONSTRUCTION CO G 0.150 4 St Peter Sand and Gravel Washing<br />
UNIMIN MINNESOTA CORP S 0.000 2.5 St Peter Sand and Gravel Washing<br />
CORN PLUS G 0.136 1 Winnebago Petroleum - Chemical Processing<br />
* G=Ground <strong>Water</strong>; S=Surface <strong>Water</strong><br />
Source: MDNR, 2004<br />
3-22 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc
Change language