Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use
Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential Industrial Reuse Demands Table 3.11a. Industrial Water Use in the Minnesota River Watershed 2004 Water Use, mgd Ground Industry Category Water Surface Water Total Agricultural Processing 11.14 0.00 11.14 Industrial Process Cooling - Once Through 1.88 0.00 1.88 Industrial Processing 0.17 0.00 0.17 Metal Processing 1.31 0.00 1.31 Mine Processing 0.20 0.04 0.24 Non-Metallic Processing 0.43 0.00 0.43 Petroleum - Chemical Processing, ethanol 1.18 0.00 1.18 Pulp and Paper Processing 0.05 0.00 0.05 Sand and Gravel Washing 0.83 1.62 2.45 Steam Power Cooling - Once Through 0.11 326.00 326.11 Total Source: MDNR, 2004 17.30 327.66 344.96 WWTPs There are 15 municipal WWTPs in the Minnesota River watershed with design capacities greater than 1 mgd. As shown in Table 3.11b, there are 3 plants with rated capacities greater than 10 mgd: Met Council’s Blue Lake and Seneca WWTPs and the Mankato WWTP. These 15 WWTPs discharged 73 mgd in 2005. The smaller WWTPs in the watershed have a combined design capacity of nearly 23 mgd, representing approximately 15% of the WWTP capacity in the watershed. Industries and Proximity to WWTPs As shown on Figure 3.11c, there are many industries of various categories residing in the Minnesota River watershed. Table 3.11c lists the various industries that are within five miles of a WWTP. Mankato has the largest number of industries in proximity of its WWTP. There are a variety of industry types utilizing ground water supplies that could be candidate industries for Mankato, in addition to the near completed construction of their project with Calpine Corporation (for 6 mgd of reclaimed water). There are several sand and gravel washing operations in St. Peter, but they are four to five miles away. Factors Influencing Potential for Industrial Reuse The Minnesota River watershed has a diverse geology that provides for three different ground water areas. Ground Water Area 5 covers the central to western reaches of the watershed. It is characterized with limited bedrock aquifers, moderate surficial sand aquifers and limited buried sand aquifers. In the north parts of the watershed, the surficial and buried sand aquifers are more productive. The eastern portions are characterized by Ground Water Area 2, which has good bedrock aquifers, moderate buried sand aquifers, and limited surfical aquifers. Well interference has occurred in some areas. The ground water contamination susceptibility of this 3-20 Craddock Consulting Engineers In Association with CDM & James Crook WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc
Minnesota Figure 3.11c. Minnesota River Watershed Industrial Reuse Customer Inventory " " ! ! Pomme de Terre " ! " ! Chippewa ! Marshall " # " " ! ! " !!! ! ! # ! Granite Falls # " ! ! " Cottonwood ") Agricultural Processing ") Industrial Process Cooling ") Industrial Processing ") Metal Processing ") Mine Processing ") Non-Metallic Processing ") Petroleum-Chemical Processing ") Pulp and Paper Processing ") Sand and Gravel Washing ") Power Generation Montevideo ! ! ! " Redwood ") #* #* !( ") ") " ! ! ! !! ! " # Major Lakes Major Rivers ! " ! ! !! ! Met ! Council ! ! - Seneca Met Council - Blue Lake ! ! ! ! ! ! ! # ! ! # ! ! "! ! ! ! ! " " ! New Prague ! ! " ! # New Ulm ! # " ! Madelia # WWTP >= 5 mgd WWTP 1-5 mgd Ground Water Surface Water Cities/Townships Watonwan St James ! ! ! Mankato ! ! !" ! # " Winnebago # ! ! Fairmont # " ! ! ! ! ! " St Peter # # ! Wells # Waseca Source: Minnesota DNR Water Appropriations Permit Program, 2004 (Withdrawls greater than 1 mgy or 10,000 gpd) " " " " " " !( " Le Sueur !( 0.00 - 0.50 mgd !( 0.51 - 1.50 mgd !( 1.51 - 5.00 mgd !( 5.01 - 10.00 mgd !( ¯ 10.01 - 25.00 mgd 25.01 - 505.00 mgd 0 30 60 Miles
- Page 93 and 94: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 95 and 96: Table 2.4. Examples of State Water
- Page 97 and 98: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 99 and 100: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 101 and 102: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 103 and 104: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 105 and 106: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 107 and 108: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 109: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 112 and 113: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 114 and 115: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 116 and 117: Section 2 Implementation Considerat
- Page 118 and 119: Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-1 I
- Page 120 and 121: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 122 and 123: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 3.6. Industrial Reuse Custom
- Page 126 and 127: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 128 and 129: Figure 3.7b. Ground Water Availabil
- Page 130 and 131: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 132 and 133: ") Figure 3.8c. Cedar River Watersh
- Page 134 and 135: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 136 and 137: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 138 and 139: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 140 and 141: ") ") ") ") Figure 3.10c. Lower Mis
- Page 142 and 143: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 146 and 147: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 148 and 149: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 150 and 151: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 152 and 153: Figure 3.12c. Mississippi River - H
- Page 154 and 155: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 156 and 157: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 158 and 159: Figure 3.14b. Rainy River Watershed
- Page 160 and 161: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 162 and 163: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 164 and 165: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 166 and 167: ") Figure 3.16c. St. Croix River Wa
- Page 168 and 169: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 170 and 171: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 172 and 173: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 174 and 175: Figure 3.18 Metro Area Industrial R
- Page 176 and 177: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 178 and 179: G G Flying Cloud Dr !! G! G Figure
- Page 180 and 181: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 182 and 183: Figure 3.22. Rogers WWTP - Industri
- Page 184 and 185: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 186 and 187: G G G! Dodd Rd GG Figure 3.24. Rose
- Page 188 and 189: Section 3 Inventory of Major WWTPs
- Page 190 and 191: G Figure 3.26. Hastings WWTP - Indu
- Page 192 and 193: State Hwy 36 ! Figure 3.28. St. Cro
Section 3<br />
Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />
Table 3.11a. <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> in the Minnesota River <strong>Water</strong>shed<br />
2004 <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong>, mgd<br />
Ground<br />
Industry Category<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Surface <strong>Water</strong> Total<br />
Agricultural Processing 11.14 0.00 11.14<br />
<strong>Industrial</strong> Process Cooling - Once Through 1.88 0.00 1.88<br />
<strong>Industrial</strong> Processing 0.17 0.00 0.17<br />
Metal Processing 1.31 0.00 1.31<br />
Mine Processing 0.20 0.04 0.24<br />
Non-Metallic Processing 0.43 0.00 0.43<br />
Petroleum - Chemical Processing, ethanol 1.18 0.00 1.18<br />
Pulp and Paper Processing 0.05 0.00 0.05<br />
Sand and Gravel Washing 0.83 1.62 2.45<br />
Steam Power Cooling - Once Through 0.11 326.00 326.11<br />
Total<br />
Source: MDNR, 2004<br />
17.30 327.66 344.96<br />
WWTPs<br />
There are 15 municipal WWTPs in the Minnesota River watershed with design<br />
capacities greater than 1 mgd. As shown in Table 3.11b, there are 3 plants with rated<br />
capacities greater than 10 mgd: Met Council’s Blue Lake and Seneca WWTPs and the<br />
Mankato WWTP. These 15 WWTPs discharged 73 mgd in 2005. The smaller WWTPs<br />
in the watershed have a combined design capacity of nearly 23 mgd, representing<br />
approximately 15% of the WWTP capacity in the watershed.<br />
Industries and Proximity to WWTPs<br />
As shown on Figure 3.11c, there are many industries of various categories residing in<br />
the Minnesota River watershed. Table 3.11c lists the various industries that are within<br />
five miles of a WWTP. Mankato has the largest number of industries in proximity of<br />
its WWTP. There are a variety of industry types utilizing ground water supplies that<br />
could be candidate industries <strong>for</strong> Mankato, in addition to the near completed<br />
construction of their project with Calpine Corporation (<strong>for</strong> 6 mgd of reclaimed water).<br />
There are several sand and gravel washing operations in St. Peter, but they are four to<br />
five miles away.<br />
Factors Influencing Potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse<br />
The Minnesota River watershed has a diverse geology that provides <strong>for</strong> three<br />
different ground water areas. Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 5 covers the central to western<br />
reaches of the watershed. It is characterized with limited bedrock aquifers, moderate<br />
surficial sand aquifers and limited buried sand aquifers. In the north parts of the<br />
watershed, the surficial and buried sand aquifers are more productive. The eastern<br />
portions are characterized by Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 2, which has good bedrock aquifers,<br />
moderate buried sand aquifers, and limited surfical aquifers. Well interference has<br />
occurred in some areas. The ground water contamination susceptibility of this<br />
3-20 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />
In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />
WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc