Soil & Water Conservation District Guidebook 2008 - Minnesota ...
Soil & Water Conservation District Guidebook 2008 - Minnesota ... Soil & Water Conservation District Guidebook 2008 - Minnesota ...
Mahnomen Soil & Water Conservation District 123 West Monroe Avenue, PO Box 381 A feedlot runoff control Mahnomen, MN 56557 PHONE: (218) 935-2987 practice was designed as a roof runoff FAX: (218) 935-5221 management system for a 273 animal unit nwmnswcd.org beef operation. The SWCD was awarded a Feedlot Water Quality Management SWCD board meetings: 2nd Tuesday of month at 7 a.m. April Grant, based on a FLEVAL rating of 59. - October, 8 a.m. November - March Total cost of the project was $53,949, and the FWQMG provided 67 percent costshare. Mahnomen County Land Cover Agricultural Forest Grass/Shrub/Wetland Water Impervious 86 SWCD Guidebook 2008-2009 Recent projects / accomplishments SWCD Board of Supervisors A Joint Powers Agreement between fi ve SWCDs and one watershed district received $13,000 for the Beaver Damage Control Program Challenge Grant. The grant provides 50 percent cost-share on prevention, beaver removal and dam removal projects. 2005 Expenditures by category Monitoring / Research $3,805 Education / Outreach $8,599 Wetland Conservation Act $22,189 Cost Share / project construction, implementation and maintenance $60,007 Planning/ other local water management duties $10,756 Conservation easement funding / assistance $18,409 Programs and Operations $29,270 Total $153,044 Name Position Address Phone Elected Everett Kjelbertson Chair 27238 County Rd. #4, Naytahwaush 935-9177 1999 Pete Revier Vice Chair 2354 250th Street, Mahnomen 473-2653 1983 Victor Eiynck Secretary 2856 120th Avenue, Mahnomen 473-2589 2007 Terry McCollum Treasurer 1468 170th Avenue, Bejou 935-2468 1995 Daniel McNamee PR & I 1851 220th Avenue, Mahnomen 935-2391 2005
AFTER BEFORE Pictured: Rock rip-rap shoreline protection project on Tulaby Lake. Five water and sediment control basins and one grade stabilization structure were completed by combining the State Cost-Share Program with an EQIP project. Together these practices will control storm runoff fl ows from a 180-acre drainage area, reducing erosion and improving water quality. Total cost of the project was $49,094. The SWCD provided 15 percent cost-share on top of the EQIP 50 percent to help reduce costs for the landowner. A Farm Bill Assistance Grant was split by the Mahnomen and Norman SWCDs. Our goals were surpassed with 1,360 contacts, 106 contracts and 3,927 acres enrolled into CRP/CCRP. Mahnomen’s 1,680 acres of CRP will bring landowners approximately $974,400 in 10 years of annual payments. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Mahnomen Soil & Water Conservation District Top 5 Natural Resource Concerns Restoring water quality in the White Earth River. Restoring water quality in Marsh Creek. Developing wellhead protection plans for public water supply areas. Sealing unused, unsealed wells in wellhead protection areas. Implementing erosion control practices where soil loss is impacting water resources. Future Projects South Twin Lake Shoreline Protection Project: A Clean Water Legacy pre-proposal was denied, but the Mahnomen SWCD didn’t give up and received 50 percent cost-share from the Wild Rice Watershed District for the South Twin Lake Shoreline Protection Project. A 715-foot rock rip-rap project will be installed to reduce sedimentation of surface waters due to shoreline degradation. The total cost of the project will be $22,308 and it should be installed by the fall of 2008. The project will provide valuable benefi ts to Mahnomen County’s natural resources. With estimated 19.01 tons / year sediment reduction and 16.16 pounds / year phosphorus reduction, local water management goals will be achieved. 87
- Page 38 and 39: Cottonwood Soil & Water Conservatio
- Page 40 and 41: Crow Wing Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 42 and 43: Dakota Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 44 and 45: Dodge Soil & Water Conservation Dis
- Page 46 and 47: Douglas Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 48 and 49: Faribault Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 50 and 51: Fillmore Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 52 and 53: Freeborn Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 54 and 55: Goodhue Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 56 and 57: Grant Soil & Water Conservation Dis
- Page 58 and 59: Hennepin Conservation District 56 S
- Page 60 and 61: Hubbard Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 62 and 63: Isanti Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 64 and 65: Itasca Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 66 and 67: Jackson Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 68 and 69: Kanabec Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 70 and 71: Kandiyohi Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 72 and 73: Kittson Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 74 and 75: Koochiching Soil & Water Conservati
- Page 76 and 77: Lac qui Parle Soil & Water Conserva
- Page 78 and 79: Lake Soil & Water Conservation Dist
- Page 80 and 81: Lake of the Woods Soil & Water Cons
- Page 82 and 83: Le Sueur Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 84 and 85: Lincoln Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 86 and 87: Lyon Soil & Water Conservation Dist
- Page 90 and 91: Marshall Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 92 and 93: Marshall-Beltrami Soil & Water Cons
- Page 94 and 95: Martin Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 96 and 97: McLeod Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 98 and 99: Meeker Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 100 and 101: Mille Lacs Soil & Water Conservatio
- Page 102 and 103: Morrison Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 104 and 105: Mower Soil & Water Conservation Dis
- Page 106 and 107: Murray Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 108 and 109: Nicollet Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 110 and 111: Nobles Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 112 and 113: Norman Soil & Water Conservation Di
- Page 114 and 115: Olmsted Soil & Water Conservation D
- Page 116 and 117: Otter Tail-East Soil & Water Conser
- Page 118 and 119: Otter Tail-West Soil & Water Conser
- Page 120 and 121: Pennington Soil & Water Conservatio
- Page 122 and 123: Pine Soil & Water Conservation Dist
- Page 124 and 125: Pipestone Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 126 and 127: East Polk Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 128 and 129: West Polk Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 130 and 131: Pope Soil & Water Conservation Dist
- Page 132 and 133: Ramsey Conservation District 130 SW
- Page 134 and 135: Red Lake Soil & Water Conservation
- Page 136 and 137: Redwood Soil & Water Conservation D
AFTER BEFORE<br />
Pictured: Rock rip-rap shoreline protection project on<br />
Tulaby Lake.<br />
Five water and sediment control basins<br />
and one grade stabilization structure were completed by<br />
combining the State Cost-Share Program with an EQIP<br />
project. Together these practices will control storm<br />
runoff fl ows from a 180-acre drainage area, reducing<br />
erosion and improving water quality. Total cost of the<br />
project was $49,094. The SWCD provided 15 percent<br />
cost-share on top of the EQIP 50 percent to help reduce<br />
costs for the landowner.<br />
A Farm Bill Assistance Grant was split<br />
by the Mahnomen and Norman SWCDs. Our goals<br />
were surpassed with 1,360 contacts, 106 contracts and<br />
3,927 acres enrolled into CRP/CCRP. Mahnomen’s<br />
1,680 acres of CRP will bring landowners approximately<br />
$974,400 in 10 years of annual payments.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
Mahnomen <strong>Soil</strong> & <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Top 5 Natural Resource Concerns<br />
Restoring water quality in the White Earth<br />
River.<br />
Restoring water quality in Marsh Creek.<br />
Developing wellhead protection plans for<br />
public water supply areas.<br />
Sealing unused, unsealed wells in wellhead<br />
protection areas.<br />
Implementing erosion control practices where<br />
soil loss is impacting water resources.<br />
Future Projects<br />
South Twin Lake Shoreline Protection Project:<br />
A Clean <strong>Water</strong> Legacy pre-proposal was denied, but<br />
the Mahnomen SWCD didn’t give up and received<br />
50 percent cost-share from the Wild Rice <strong>Water</strong>shed<br />
<strong>District</strong> for the South Twin Lake Shoreline Protection<br />
Project. A 715-foot rock rip-rap project will be<br />
installed to reduce sedimentation of surface waters<br />
due to shoreline degradation. The total cost of the<br />
project will be $22,308 and it should be installed by<br />
the fall of <strong>2008</strong>. The project will provide valuable<br />
benefi ts to Mahnomen County’s natural resources.<br />
With estimated 19.01 tons / year sediment reduction<br />
and 16.16 pounds / year phosphorus reduction, local<br />
water management goals will be achieved.<br />
87