Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Minnesota State ...
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Minnesota State ... Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - Minnesota State ...
2012 Comprehensive Financial Report This page left blank intentionally.
Actuary’s Certification Letter December 6, 2012 Board of Trustees Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota 60 Empire Drive, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55103-2088 Members of the Board: We have prepared and presented to you our annual actuarial valuation of the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF), the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF), the Public Employees Correctional Fund (PECF), and the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund (MERF) as of June 30, 2012. In this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), all supporting schedules in the Actuarial Section and the Schedule of Funding Progress and the Schedule of Employer Contributions in the Financial Section have been prepared by PERA based on the information included in reports on the annual actuarial valuation prepared by Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company (GRS). The annual actuarial valuation reports are available on the PERA website. Valuation Results The results of the valuations are summarized in the following table. For all plans except MERF, because the valuation smooths asset returns over five years, the actuarial value of assets is slightly higher than the fair value of assets, and the funding ratios on that basis are slightly higher and the deficiencies are lower than the market value of assets results. The valuation for MERF is based on the market value of assets. Accrued Liability Contribution Sufficiency/ Funding Ratio Deficiency (% of Pay) Actuarial Market Actuarial Market Statutory Value Value Value Value Amortization Plan of Assets of Assets of Assets of Assets Date GERF 73.45% 73.00% -0.96% -1.08% 2031 PEPFF 78.31% 77.97% -7.94% -8.14% 2039 PECF 89.29% 88.99% 0.13% 0.08% 2031 MERF 69.10% 69.10% 288.20% 288.20% 2031 A ctuarial Section A contribution deficiency means that over the long run, without further changes or favorable actuarial experience, the contributions scheduled to be made to the fund will not meet the goal of full funding by the statutory amortization date. For the PEPFF, there is a very significant contribution deficiency. Without changes, the funded status of PEPFF will deteriorate in the future and assets will be depleted. Changes in Actuarial Assumptions and Methods The following changes were recognized this year for all plans: • The investment return assumption was changed from 8.5% to a 5-year select and ultimate approach with rates of 8.0% for the period July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2017 and 8.5% thereafter. • Decrement timing was changed from beginning of year to midyear decrement timing. For the GERF, the following changes in actuarial assumptions were recognized: • The future salary growth rates were updated to be approximately 25 basis points lower on average than the previous table. • Augmentation for privatizations occurring after 2010 was reduced. Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota 53
- Page 11 and 12: Economic Conditions and Outlook Alt
- Page 13 and 14: National Recognition PERA has an ou
- Page 15 and 16: Ross E. Arneson General Membership
- Page 17 and 18: The Public Employees Police and Fir
- Page 19 and 20: Pre-Age 62 Increase — This pensio
- Page 21 and 22: Legislative Auditor’s Report Mana
- Page 23 and 24: Legislative Auditor’s Report O L
- Page 25 and 26: Financial Highlights å PERA’s Ne
- Page 27 and 28: made in 2010 and contribution rate
- Page 29 and 30: This page left blank intentionally.
- Page 31 and 32: Statewide Public Employees Agency F
- Page 33 and 34: Financial Section Minneapolis Emplo
- Page 35 and 36: facilities. Elected officials and a
- Page 37 and 38: are recognized as revenues when due
- Page 39 and 40: å The aggregate value of these obl
- Page 41 and 42: of the value protected by the wrap
- Page 43 and 44: age of pay, and are specified in st
- Page 45 and 46: Employer pension contributions for
- Page 47 and 48: Schedule of Employer Contributions
- Page 49 and 50: Source of Expenses Schedule of Inve
- Page 51 and 52: Investment Report Investment Result
- Page 53 and 54: Investment Report MINNESOTA STATE B
- Page 55 and 56: 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15%
- Page 57 and 58: Investment Summary at Fair Value Fo
- Page 59 and 60: SBI & Consultants: State Board of I
- Page 61: Actuary’s Certification Letter Su
- Page 65 and 66: General Employees Retirement Fund A
- Page 67 and 68: Other Assumptions Separation GERF u
- Page 69 and 70: General Employees Retirement Fund A
- Page 71 and 72: Public Employees Correctional Fund
- Page 73 and 74: General Employees Retirement Fund A
- Page 75 and 76: Public Employees Correctional Fund
- Page 77 and 78: Introduction Schedule of Changes in
- Page 79 and 80: Introduction December 14, 2012 Publ
- Page 81 and 82: Statistical Section 2007 2008 2009
- Page 83 and 84: Statistical Section 2007 2008 2009
- Page 85 and 86: Statistical Section 2007 2008 2009
- Page 87 and 88: Fire Department Statistical Section
- Page 89 and 90: General Employees Retirement Fund A
- Page 91 and 92: Statistical Section Schedule of New
- Page 93 and 94: General Employees Retirement Fund S
- Page 95 and 96: Schedule of Benefit Recipients by T
- Page 97 and 98: Top 10 States by PERA Annuitant Pop
- Page 99 and 100: General Employees Retirement Fund P
- Page 101 and 102: ISANTI ISLE IVANHOE JACKSON JANESVI
- Page 103 and 104: DEER CREEK DEER PARK DEER RIVER DEE
- Page 105 and 106: PIERZ PIKE PIKE BAY PIKE CREEK PILL
- Page 107 and 108: BROOKLYN CENTER ISD-286 BROOTEN ISD
- Page 109 and 110: VILLARD ISD-615 VIRGINIA ISD-706 WA
- Page 111 and 112: CROW WING COUNTY SWCD CURRIE DUVRAY
2012 <strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
This page left<br />
blank intentionally.