Strategy For Limiting Risks Human Health Draft of ... - ECHA - Europa
Strategy For Limiting Risks Human Health Draft of ... - ECHA - Europa
Strategy For Limiting Risks Human Health Draft of ... - ECHA - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Respiratory tract<br />
Regarding the sensitising potential <strong>of</strong> cryolite at the respiratory tract no information is<br />
available. Therefore there is no concern for consumers regarding respiratory sensitisation.<br />
Conclusion (ii) There is at present no need for further information and/or testing and<br />
for risk reduction measures beyond those which are being applied<br />
already.<br />
Repeated dose toxicity<br />
Since the relevant consumer exposure scenarios are characterized by inhalation <strong>of</strong> cryolite<br />
dermal and oral repeated dose toxicity was not further calculated.<br />
Inhalation<br />
The human NOAEC for inhalation is derived from a study in aluminium smelter with longterm<br />
occupational exposure and is given as 0.48 mg fluoride/m 3 for skeletal fluorosis. Animal<br />
data showed dystrophic lesions in bones and teeth and adverse effects in the respiratory tract,<br />
stomach, kidney, liver and brain in a 5-month inhalation study in male and female rats with a<br />
systemic NOAEC <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mg/m 3 that should be used for risk characterisation.<br />
<strong>For</strong> the decision on the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> MOS, the following aspects have been considered<br />
and taken into account<br />
-overall confidence in the data base:<br />
The data taken into account for performing the risk characterisation have been evaluated with<br />
regard to their reliability, relvance and completeness according to section 3.2 <strong>of</strong> the TGD<br />
-uncertainty arising from the variability in the experimental data:<br />
The data on toxicity after inhalation exposure is sufficient to allow the identification <strong>of</strong> an<br />
effect level for risk characterisation. There are no reason to assume a special extent <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty which has to be taken into account.<br />
intra- and interspecies variation:<br />
Available data do not allow a conclusion on the intraspecies or interspecies variability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
toxicokinetic or toxicodynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> cryolite under consideration.<br />
The nature and severity <strong>of</strong> the effect:<br />
The observed adverse effects in animals and humans are regard as serious. The systemic<br />
health effects are the basis for the classification as toxic, R48/23/25.<br />
- dose-response relationship:<br />
There is no reason to assume a special concern<br />
The human population to which the information on exposure applies:<br />
following the exposure pattern there is no reason to assume a special risk for children, elderly,<br />
or pregnant women<br />
31