17.08.2013 Views

Leveling the curve of Spee with a continuous archwire technique: A ...

Leveling the curve of Spee with a continuous archwire technique: A ...

Leveling the curve of Spee with a continuous archwire technique: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

368 Bernstein, Preston, and Lampasso<br />

After treatment, <strong>the</strong> incisors retroclined a mean distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> –0.10 mm relative to <strong>the</strong> A-Po line, resulting<br />

in an overall (T3) mean proclination <strong>of</strong> 1.41 mm<br />

(SD, 1.57 mm). A negative value for <strong>the</strong> measurement<br />

represents lingual movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tooth.<br />

There was a statistically significant difference between<br />

<strong>the</strong> T1 and T2 measurements P ( .0001) (Table IV).<br />

American Journal <strong>of</strong> Orthodontics and Dent<strong>of</strong>acial Orthopedics<br />

March 2007<br />

leveled completely, whereas 32% had slight residual<br />

COS at T2. For <strong>the</strong> latter patients, <strong>the</strong> average amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> COS at T2 was 0.19 mm; this is probably clinically<br />

insignificant. The T2 models all showed Class I molar<br />

and canine relationships <strong>with</strong> properly finished buccal<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It is generally accepted that, <strong>with</strong> a few notable<br />

exceptions, leveling a deep COS makes an important<br />

contribution to <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> orthodontic treatment.<br />

18-20,34,39-43 In a study that compared sectional<br />

and <strong>continuous</strong> <strong>archwire</strong> treatments <strong>of</strong> adolescent patients<br />

<strong>with</strong> Class II, deep-bite, low-angle malocclusions,<br />

it was found that both <strong>technique</strong>s corrected deep<br />

bites. 4,5 Although <strong>the</strong>se studies compared <strong>the</strong> effective -<br />

ness <strong>of</strong> overbite correction as measured on cephalometric<br />

x-rays, <strong>the</strong>y did not measure <strong>the</strong> COS, or <strong>the</strong><br />

effectiveness and long-term stability <strong>of</strong> leveling <strong>the</strong><br />

COS. Our study was prompted by a belief that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was a need for a long-term, comprehensive, radiographic,<br />

and study model analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effectiveness<br />

and stability <strong>of</strong> leveling <strong>the</strong> COS.<br />

Before we analyzed <strong>the</strong> data from <strong>the</strong> cephalometric<br />

investigation, <strong>the</strong> radiographic assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> COS<br />

performed in this investigation required validation.<br />

Integral to this process were <strong>the</strong> COS measurements<br />

21<br />

recorded by Carcara et al in <strong>the</strong>ir study model<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> COS in <strong>the</strong> same sample group. The 2<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> measurements were compared and analyzed to<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> recording <strong>the</strong> COS<br />

from lateral cephalographic x-rays produced <strong>the</strong> same<br />

results as those recorded from <strong>the</strong> study models. There<br />

were no statistically significant differences (P .01)<br />

between <strong>the</strong> radiographic and <strong>the</strong> study model COS<br />

measurements for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 31 patients at T1, T2, and<br />

T3. 21 occlusions and normal overjets and overbites.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paired t test comparing <strong>the</strong> COS at T2<br />

<strong>with</strong> that at T3 indicated a statistically significant<br />

change (P .001) in this metrical character. The COS<br />

increased from a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.19 mm at T2 to a mean <strong>of</strong><br />

0.69 mm at T3. Thus, <strong>the</strong> COS relapsed on average 0.5<br />

0mm over a mean period <strong>of</strong> 7 years 5 months after <strong>the</strong><br />

fixed lingual canine-to-canine mandibular retainers<br />

were removed (an average <strong>of</strong> 11 years 5 months<br />

postdebond). Although <strong>the</strong> relapse in <strong>the</strong> COS might be<br />

statistically significant, it is a relatively small change,<br />

which, in turn, probably represents a normal physiologic<br />

process.<br />

The correlation percentage between <strong>the</strong> 2 meth -<br />

ods was approximately 97%. Only 1 patient who was<br />

measured to be level after treatment in <strong>the</strong> study model<br />

analysis was not considered level in <strong>the</strong> cephalometric<br />

analysis. Taking into account all factors that could have<br />

influenced <strong>the</strong> recordings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> COS by <strong>the</strong> 2 methods<br />

and <strong>the</strong> closeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results, we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed radiographic assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> COS is valid.<br />

The cephalometric radiographs were taken on a Quint<br />

Sectograph that was set to focus on <strong>the</strong> cranial landmarks<br />

on <strong>the</strong> left side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> face.<br />

From this study, it seems that <strong>the</strong> <strong>continuous</strong><br />

<strong>archwire</strong> <strong>technique</strong> is an effective orthodontic approach<br />

for leveling a COS in Class II Division 1 nonextraction<br />

deep-bite patients whose initial COS was 2 to 4 mm.<br />

Sixty-eight percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> patients studied here were<br />

19-21,27 A previous study, although con -<br />

firming that <strong>the</strong> leveling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> COS is a stable<br />

treatment outcome, could not show that <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong><br />

leveling was correlated <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> relapse <strong>of</strong><br />

this parameter. 44 Unfortunately, those authors did not<br />

specify <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>technique</strong> used to treat <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

patients, who had various malocclusion types. In our<br />

study, <strong>the</strong> COS tended to relapse more in subjects <strong>with</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> deepest COS at T1. The Pearson correlation coefficient<br />

(initial COS vs posttreatment changes) was<br />

0.380 (P .0349); this was statistically significant <strong>with</strong><br />

set at 0.05 but not <strong>with</strong> set at 0.01. At least 1 o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

study confirmed our finding that <strong>the</strong> more <strong>the</strong> COS is<br />

leveled during treatment, <strong>the</strong> more it relapses after<br />

treatment. 45 That study had a relatively short mean<br />

posttreatment time <strong>of</strong> 2 years 8 months in <strong>the</strong>ir patients,<br />

who were treated <strong>with</strong> various appliances, and who had<br />

different malocclusion types. Although dental heights<br />

were recorded in <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> mixed malocclusions, no<br />

attempt was made to compensate for <strong>the</strong> affects <strong>of</strong><br />

growth on <strong>the</strong>se dimensions.<br />

The overall long-term (T3-T1) effect <strong>of</strong> orthodontic<br />

treatment <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>continuous</strong> arch <strong>technique</strong> was an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 72.97% reduction in <strong>the</strong> pretreatment COS.<br />

Ten <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 31 patients remained 100% level over a time<br />

span <strong>of</strong> 5 to 25 years after orthodontic treatment. Only<br />

5 patients had residual COS <strong>of</strong> over 1 mm, and none<br />

was deeper than 2 mm. This study indicates that relapse<br />

in <strong>the</strong> COS occurred slowly and over an extended<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re are speculations in <strong>the</strong> literature<br />

about <strong>the</strong> contributions <strong>of</strong> various occlusal elements<br />

involved in leveling <strong>the</strong> COS, <strong>the</strong>se reports do not<br />

quantify <strong>the</strong> contributions.<br />

3,19,43-47 At <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study, <strong>the</strong>re was an attempt to use a mandibular<br />

superimposition method, 48 patterned after Björk’s<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!