17.08.2013 Views

The Secret Of The Veda Aurobindo - HolyBooks.com

The Secret Of The Veda Aurobindo - HolyBooks.com

The Secret Of The Veda Aurobindo - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Secret</strong> of the <strong>Veda</strong><br />

explain their existence. And from this childlike wonder we stride<br />

at one step to the profound theories of the Greek philosophers<br />

and the <strong>Veda</strong>ntic sages. Comparative Mythology is the creation<br />

of Hellenists interpreting un-Hellenic data from a standpoint<br />

which is itself founded on a misunderstanding of the Greek<br />

mind. Its method has been an ingenious play of the poetic<br />

imagination rather than a patient scientific research.<br />

If we look at the results of the method, we find an extraordinary<br />

confusion of images and of their interpretations in which<br />

there is nowhere any coherence or consistency. It is a mass of<br />

details running into each other, getting confusedly into each<br />

other’s way, disagreeing yet entangled, dependent for their validity<br />

on the licence of imaginative conjecture as our sole means<br />

of knowledge. This incoherence has even been exalted into a<br />

standard of truth; for it is seriously argued by eminent scholars<br />

that a method arriving at a more logical and well-ordered result<br />

would be disproved and discredited by its very coherency, since<br />

confusion must be supposed to be the very essence of the early<br />

mythopoeic faculty. But in that case there can be nothing binding<br />

in the results of Comparative Mythology and one theory will be<br />

as good as another; for there is no reason why one particular<br />

mass of incoherence should be held to be more valid than<br />

another mass of incoherence differently <strong>com</strong>posed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is much that is useful in the speculations of Comparative<br />

Mythology; but in order that the bulk of its results<br />

should be sound and acceptable, it must use a more patient and<br />

consistent method and organise itself as part of a well-founded<br />

Science of Religion. We must recognise that the old religions<br />

were organic systems founded on ideas which were at least as<br />

coherent as those which constitute our modern systems of belief.<br />

We must recognise also that there has been a perfectly intelligible<br />

progressive development from the earlier to the later systems of<br />

religious creed and of philosophical thought. It is by studying<br />

our data widely and profoundly in this spirit and discovering<br />

the true evolution of human thought and belief that we shall<br />

arrive at real knowledge. <strong>The</strong> mere identification of Greek and<br />

Sanskrit names and the ingenious discovery that Heracles’ pyre is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!