the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

destination area's 'physical carrying capacity' for tourism activity. Hence, calls in the tourism literature for environmental conservation are echoed in the World Commission's belief that sustainable development does not endanger or degrade the natural systems that support life on Earth. In the words of the World Commission: 'Different limits hold for the use of energy, materials, water and land. Many of these will manifest themselves in the form of rising costs and diminishing returns, rather than in the form of any sudden loss of a resource base. The accumulation of knowledge and the development of technology can enhance the carrying capacity of the resource base. But ultimate limits there are, and sustainability requires that long before these are reached, the world must ensure equitable access to the constrained resource and reorient technological efforts to relieve the pressure' (WCED, 1987, p.45). The notion of limiting development to within environmental carrying capacities applies to the several types of resources. Therefore, renewable resources, such as animal and plant species used for food, clothing, building, fuel, medicines, etc., need not be depleted for future generations provided that the rate of use does not exceed the limits of natural regeneration and renewal, and this is the concept of 'sustainable yield'. As previously discussed, tourism-related activities, such as collection and killing for the souvenir trade, exceeded the sustainable yield for individual species and since species interact, the reduction in numbers of one species through human exploitation may have ecosystem-wide impacts, and the maximum sustainable yield must also take account of these potential system-wide effects (Hunter and Green, 1995). With regard to non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, metallic and non­ metallic minerals, the World Commission upholds the view that sustainable development requires that the rate of depletion of these resources should foreclose as few future options as possible. Essentially, a non-renewable resource should not be exhausted before acceptable substitutes or alternatives have been provided. Emphasis should, therefore, focus on economy of use, re-use and recycling. Lastly, the World Commission argues that the Earth's systems which support life, (atmosphere, oceans, fresh-waters, soils, rock formations) are too often regarded as 64

infinite or infinitely renewable 'free goods' for human activities like waste disposal. Negative impacts on these natural elements should be minimised so as to sustain the overall integrity of the Earth's ecosystems (Hunter and Green, 1995). What should be clear is that sustainable development is a long-term and global endeavour. This should also be apparent from the more refined definition of sustainable development as: "a process of change in which the exploitation of resources, the direction of investments, the orientation of technological development, and the institutional change are all in harmony and enhance both current and future potential to meet human needs and aspiration" (WeED, 1987, p.46). As if such a process of change will not prove to be problematic enough, the concept of sustainable development itself is by no means unanimously accepted or interpreted in the same way. However, some interpretation is required before progress can be made in realising the goals of sustainable tourism development (Hunter and Green, 1995). To this end, a brief examination of the broader debate between economic development and resource conservation is focused on in the following section. 2.12.1 Sustainable Development and Conservation versus Development Unfortunately, the more one focuses on the concept of sustainable development, the more illusory its apparent simplicity becomes. The term can be considered to represent different viewpoints according to one's bearing on the more general debate between economic development and resource conservation. The concept is flexible and can be moulded to 'fit' widely differing approaches to environmental management. There also appears to be little sign of an emergence of an accepted consensus view on the meaning and policy implications of sustainable development. Hence, it is perhaps too easy to assume that disparate groups, such as certain tourism developers and conservationists, will converge on an accepted interpretation of sustainable development so that the co-operation necessary to achieve sustainable tourism development will be forthcoming. The gulf that often exists between certain tourism developers and conservationists, for example, can be illustrated by considering two 'extreme' 'world-views' on the relationship between economic development and resource conservation as illustrated by Turner (1991). 65

dest<strong>in</strong>ation area's 'physical carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity' for <strong>tourism</strong> activity. Hence, calls <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>tourism</strong> literature for environmental conservation are echoed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> World<br />

Commission's belief that susta<strong>in</strong>able development does not endanger or degrade<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>natural</strong> systems that support life on Earth. In <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> World<br />

Commission:<br />

'Different limits hold for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> energy, materials, water and land. Many <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se will manifest <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g costs and dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> any sudden loss <strong>of</strong> a <strong>resource</strong> base. The accumulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> technology can enhance <strong>the</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>resource</strong> base. But ultimate limits <strong>the</strong>re are, and susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

requires that long before <strong>the</strong>se are reached, <strong>the</strong> world must ensure equitable<br />

access to <strong>the</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>resource</strong> and reorient technological efforts to relieve <strong>the</strong><br />

pressure' (WCED, 1987, p.45).<br />

The notion <strong>of</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g development to with<strong>in</strong> environmental carry<strong>in</strong>g capacities<br />

applies to <strong>the</strong> several types <strong>of</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s. Therefore, renewable <strong>resource</strong>s, such as<br />

animal and plant species used for food, cloth<strong>in</strong>g, build<strong>in</strong>g, fuel, medic<strong>in</strong>es, etc., need<br />

not be depleted for future generations provided that <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> use does not exceed<br />

<strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>natural</strong> regeneration and renewal, and this is <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> 'susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

yield'. As previously discussed, <strong>tourism</strong>-related activities, such as collection and<br />

kill<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> souvenir trade, exceeded <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able yield for <strong>in</strong>dividual species<br />

and s<strong>in</strong>ce species <strong>in</strong>teract, <strong>the</strong> reduction <strong>in</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> one species through human<br />

exploitation may have ecosystem-wide impacts, and <strong>the</strong> maximum susta<strong>in</strong>able yield<br />

must also take account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se potential system-wide effects (Hunter and Green,<br />

1995).<br />

With regard to non-renewable <strong>resource</strong>s such as fossil fuels, metallic and non­<br />

metallic m<strong>in</strong>erals, <strong>the</strong> World Commission upholds <strong>the</strong> view that susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development requires that <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>resource</strong>s should foreclose<br />

as few future options as possible. Essentially, a non-renewable <strong>resource</strong> should not<br />

be exhausted before acceptable substitutes or alternatives have been provided.<br />

Emphasis should, <strong>the</strong>refore, focus on economy <strong>of</strong> use, re-use and recycl<strong>in</strong>g. Lastly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> World Commission argues that <strong>the</strong> Earth's systems which support life,<br />

(atmosphere, oceans, fresh-waters, soils, rock formations) are too <strong>of</strong>ten regarded as<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!