the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
government. These transactions form further flows of income and extend the indirect linkages of tourism well beyond the immediate core of the industry (Williams, 1998). The aim of multiplier analysis is therefore to establish the impact generated in any given tourist destination, for every dollar that is spent on the tourist product (Alex, 1997). The multiplier concept is summed up in its simplest form by Eadington and Redman (1991). The "greater the amount of local/regional resource utilisation, and the lower the proportion of imported goods that enter into local consumption and production expenditures, the higher the multiplier" (p. 52). The multiplier process can be divided into three levels of effect. Firstly, a direct effect, which is the original injection of revenue into the local economy by the tourist, for example, through the payment of a hotel bill. Secondly, an indirect effect, which consists of a second wave of spending by the recipients of initial expenditures, in purchasing the goods and services required by the tourists. An example of such spending is the purchase, by the hotelier, of local goods for the hotel restaurant. Thirdly, an induced effect, which consists of further spending by the beneficiaries of the direct and indirect effects, on goods and services for their own consumption. An example of such spending is the purchase of clothing by the hotel waiter (Williams, 1998). Multipliers are usually expressed as a ratio in which the predicted increase in income associated with a unit of currency is stated. Therefore, a multiplier of 1.35 would indicate that for every $1 spent, a further $0.35 is generated by the indirect and induced effects. However, the scale of the multiplier will fluctuate, depending upon the extent of development within the economy, the type of tourism and the degree to which the local economy can supply the tourism industry from its own resources and, hence, the extent to which the leakage effects may be minimised (Williams, 1998). 2.8.1.2 Creation of Employment One of the most notable direct advantages of tourism is that of public and private employment (Mathieson and Wall, 1982). However, the number of jobs generated by 32
tourism, the type of skills that are required and the type of worker that is needed must also be considered (de Kadt, 1979). Tourism employment can be classified into three levels. Firstly, that of direct employment in businesses that market goods and services to tourists, such as hotels and restaurants. Secondly, that of indirect employment resulting from tourist expenditures in activities such as manufacturing and wholesaling that supply goods and services to tourism businesses. Examples of indirect employment are present in construction, agricultural and manufacturing industries. The extent of indirect employment available is determined by the level of integration of the tourism industry with the rest of the local economy. Therefore, the higher the level of integration, the greater the level of indirect employment. The third level of classification consists of investment-related employment found in construction and other capital goods' industries (de Kadt, 1979). In the initial stages of tourism development most jobs are held by people from the immediate area. As tourism grows and the facilities increase, migrants can become a large part of the local labour force. This often occurs when resorts are placed in sparsely populated areas where little or no tourist activity has previously taken place (de Kadt, 1979). Tourism not only creates jobs and business opportunities directly related to travel, such as hotels and attraction establishments, but it also helps diversify and stabilise the local economy. Tourism tends to create new employment opportunities in the host community and therefore influences migration patterns in two chief directions. It aids in retaining citizens who would migrate away, particularly unemployed or underemployed youths in economically marginal areas. Secondly, it also attracts outsiders who are seeking economic opportunity or employment and who often originate from other divisions of the economy, particularly agriculture. Tourism may also aid in attracting additional industry to the community, thus creating new and increased economic opportunities and jobs (Schneider, 1993). Cohen (1954, p.76) states that tourism"...encourages new economic activities in ancillary services and thus indirectly creates new opportunities for economic mobility among the locals". 33
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTR
- Page 7 and 8: 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8.1 4.8.2 4.8
- Page 9 and 10: 5.4.1.6 Batawana and Natural Resour
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER SEVEN: NATURAL RESOURCE UTI
- Page 13 and 14: 8.2.1 Migration in the Okavango Del
- Page 15 and 16: REFERENCES APPENDICES XIV 417 459
- Page 17 and 18: Table 6.15: Room and Bed Occupancy
- Page 19 and 20: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Study o
- Page 21 and 22: ACP ADP AE10 AIDS ALDEP ARAP BAMB B
- Page 23: SPSS STMT TGLP UB UNDP UNEP UNRISD
- Page 26 and 27: Empirical evidence, however, does n
- Page 28 and 29: norms of its people. To date, the g
- Page 30 and 31: numbers (Appendix One). Investigati
- Page 32 and 33: 4. Establish the extent of natural
- Page 34 and 35: detailed in chapter five. The insti
- Page 36 and 37: destinations, concentrating on its
- Page 38 and 39: serious academic consideration. The
- Page 40 and 41: Figure 2.1: Study of Tourism and Ch
- Page 42 and 43: management strategies are implement
- Page 44 and 45: Tourism should thus be regarded as
- Page 46 and 47: exchange, investment, income and em
- Page 48 and 49: problem. He states that it is time
- Page 50 and 51: The first assumption is largely bas
- Page 52 and 53: However, as Western (1993) points o
- Page 54: Fourth, tourism may bring about dev
- Page 59 and 60: Despite the various economic benefi
- Page 61 and 62: Some cultural modifications due to
- Page 63 and 64: 2.8.5 Environmental Benefits of Tou
- Page 65 and 66: However, as Gunn (1994) points out,
- Page 67 and 68: or displacing another group of user
- Page 69 and 70: protection of the environment was t
- Page 71 and 72: These range from the numerous impac
- Page 73 and 74: difficult to foresee and which refl
- Page 75 and 76: carried unintentionally on the shoe
- Page 77 and 78: Pyrenees (Smith and Jenner, 1989).
- Page 79 and 80: waste is being developed or upgrade
- Page 81 and 82: water, however, inhibits the natura
- Page 83 and 84: arrivals and Riccione hoteliers alo
- Page 85 and 86: 1981). Butler (1991) recognises tha
- Page 87 and 88: economic growth in developed countr
- Page 89 and 90: infinite or infinitely renewable 'f
- Page 91 and 92: also be described as a 'deep ecolog
- Page 93 and 94: Having highlighted the general conc
- Page 95 and 96: • • • • • • Follow ethi
- Page 97 and 98: The English Tourist Board (1991, ci
- Page 99 and 100: as ideas and technologies on the pa
- Page 101 and 102: eap net benefits, tourism can be cl
- Page 103 and 104: 2.14 Summary and Conclusion This ch
government. These transactions form fur<strong>the</strong>r flows <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and extend <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct<br />
l<strong>in</strong>kages <strong>of</strong> <strong>tourism</strong> well beyond <strong>the</strong> immediate core <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry (Williams, 1998).<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> multiplier analysis is <strong>the</strong>refore to establish <strong>the</strong> impact generated <strong>in</strong> any<br />
given tourist dest<strong>in</strong>ation, for every dollar that is spent on <strong>the</strong> tourist product (Alex,<br />
1997). The multiplier concept is summed up <strong>in</strong> its simplest form by Ead<strong>in</strong>gton and<br />
Redman (1991). The "greater <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> local/regional <strong>resource</strong> utilisation, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> lower <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> imported goods that enter <strong>in</strong>to local consumption and<br />
production expenditures, <strong>the</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> multiplier" (p. 52).<br />
The multiplier process can be divided <strong>in</strong>to three levels <strong>of</strong> effect. Firstly, a direct<br />
effect, which is <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>of</strong> revenue <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> local economy by <strong>the</strong> tourist,<br />
for example, through <strong>the</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> a hotel bill. Secondly, an <strong>in</strong>direct effect, which<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> a second wave <strong>of</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> recipients <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial expenditures, <strong>in</strong><br />
purchas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> goods and services required by <strong>the</strong> tourists. An example <strong>of</strong> such<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> purchase, by <strong>the</strong> hotelier, <strong>of</strong> local goods for <strong>the</strong> hotel restaurant.<br />
Thirdly, an <strong>in</strong>duced effect, which consists <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r spend<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> direct and <strong>in</strong>direct effects, on goods and services for <strong>the</strong>ir own consumption. An<br />
example <strong>of</strong> such spend<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> cloth<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> hotel waiter (Williams,<br />
1998).<br />
Multipliers are usually expressed as a ratio <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> predicted <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>come associated with a unit <strong>of</strong> currency is stated. Therefore, a multiplier <strong>of</strong> 1.35<br />
would <strong>in</strong>dicate that for every $1 spent, a fur<strong>the</strong>r $0.35 is generated by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>direct<br />
and <strong>in</strong>duced effects. However, <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiplier will fluctuate, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
upon <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> development with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy, <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> <strong>tourism</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />
degree to which <strong>the</strong> local economy can supply <strong>the</strong> <strong>tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry from its own<br />
<strong>resource</strong>s and, hence, <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> leakage effects may be m<strong>in</strong>imised<br />
(Williams, 1998).<br />
2.8.1.2 Creation <strong>of</strong> Employment<br />
One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most notable direct advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>tourism</strong> is that <strong>of</strong> public and private<br />
employment (Mathieson and Wall, 1982). However, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> jobs generated by<br />
32