the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

of 1986 and the Tourism Policy of 1990 provide for the re-introduction of community involvement in wildlife conservation and tourism through the implementation of Community Based Natural Resource Management projects (CBNRM). The establishment of the Moremi Game Reserve in 1963 was also an important step in the promotion of the conservation of the Okavango Delta and the development of the areas tourism industry. With regard to natural resource management in the Okavango Delta, Mbaiwa (1999) states that the management of the country's resources and the development and implementation of policies from a centralised body has prevented the local population from playing any significant role in the management of resources in the region. As such, many of the government's policies have little support from the local population and are not considered as being legitimate. Hence they are not as effective, which has also resulted in the development of negative attitudes by local populations towards wildlife management and conservation, as well as the wildlife­ based tourism industry. The ministries also tend to formulate sectorial policies that often conflict with each other during implementation. Moreover, the natural resource use institutions such as the Department of Wildlife and National Parks are placed under ministries which lack the political support to influence the effective management of the country's natural resources (Mbaiwa, 1999). This implies that such ministries lack the relevant administration capacity, infrastructure and knowledge to manage protected areas and wildlife species and to enforce environmental laws and regulations. Government policies regarding land and resource utilization and management in the Okavango Delta and the country as a whole, are largely formulated and adopted without the full involvement and participation of some of the major stakeholders, notably the local communities. This has effectively resulted in the local population in the Okavango Delta receiving few to no real benefits from the major land use activities in the region, namely tourism and wildlife management. As a result, local communities have developed negative attitudes towards wildlife management and tourism, and do not support the government policies, such as the Tourism Policy of 1990, which dictate the nature of these industries. This situation makes the current 390

forms of wildlife management and tourism in the region unsustainable over the long­ term (Mbaiwa, 1999). The Tourism Policy of 1990 is the primary government policy behind the development of the country's tourism industry. However, findings in chapter six indicate that this 'high-cost low-volume' tourism policy is out of reach of the local communities and will continue to promote the current exclusionist-elitist divisional forms of tourism present in the Okavango Delta. What is needed, is more employment-led ventures which can be executed through low-impact, higher volume activities such as walking and mekoro (boat) safaris, as opposed to vehicle-lodge operations which do not maximise employment and encourage habitat degradation. As such, tourism would be of greater benefit to local communities if made to promote their small-scale tourist projects instead of the large-scale ventures, which local communities generally cannot manage due to a lack of necessary skills and resources (Mbaiwa, 1999). Findings also indicate that certain government officials felt that the high-cost low­ volume tourist approach was not based on sound environmental assessments, but rather on cost-effective measures. To date, no environmental impact assessment has been conducted and the Tourism Policy is also faced with a number of problems, including a lack of implementation due to a shortage of manpower, limited equipment, and a lack of scientific data. As a result, the policy is ineffective and there is a general lack of monitoring and co-ordination. Concern has been expressed about the high influx of tourists and mobile tour operators in Ngamiland District. The major attraction is the financial and economic returns, and the problems of monitoring and lack of coordination emerge from the undue emphasis on profit and shortage of manpower in the Department of Tourism. Most of the bookings, payments and banking for lodges in the Okavango Delta is done outside of Botswana or in Gaborone, and many of the foreign tourists who visit the Delta have an attitude of "I book and make a payment in Johannesburg, then come to enjoy the sight of the Okavango Delta, buy a t-shirt or basket and then go back home". This indicates the kind of attitude tourists have towards local community development and their apparent insensitivity to the local and environmental situation in host countries, a scenario perpetuated by the Tourism Policy (Mbaiwa, 2002). 391

<strong>of</strong> 1986 and <strong>the</strong> Tourism Policy <strong>of</strong> 1990 provide for <strong>the</strong> re-<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> community<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> wildlife conservation and <strong>tourism</strong> through <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

Community Based Natural Resource Management projects (CBNRM). The<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Moremi Game Reserve <strong>in</strong> 1963 was also an important step <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

areas <strong>tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

With regard to <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta, Mbaiwa (1999)<br />

states that <strong>the</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country's <strong>resource</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> development and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> policies from a centralised body has prevented <strong>the</strong> local<br />

population from play<strong>in</strong>g any significant <strong>role</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

region. As such, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government's policies have little support from <strong>the</strong> local<br />

population and are not considered as be<strong>in</strong>g legitimate. Hence <strong>the</strong>y are not as<br />

effective, which has also resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> negative attitudes by local<br />

populations towards wildlife <strong>management</strong> and conservation, as well as <strong>the</strong> wildlife­<br />

based <strong>tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>istries also tend to formulate sectorial policies that <strong>of</strong>ten conflict with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r dur<strong>in</strong>g implementation. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong> use <strong>in</strong>stitutions such as<br />

<strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and National Parks are placed under m<strong>in</strong>istries which lack<br />

<strong>the</strong> political support to <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> effective <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country's <strong>natural</strong><br />

<strong>resource</strong>s (Mbaiwa, 1999). This implies that such m<strong>in</strong>istries lack <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration capacity, <strong>in</strong>frastructure and knowledge to manage protected areas<br />

and wildlife species and to enforce environmental laws and regulations.<br />

Government policies regard<strong>in</strong>g land and <strong>resource</strong> utilization and <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Okavango Delta and <strong>the</strong> country as a whole, are largely formulated and adopted<br />

without <strong>the</strong> full <strong>in</strong>volvement and participation <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major stakeholders,<br />

notably <strong>the</strong> local communities. This has effectively resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local population <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta receiv<strong>in</strong>g few to no real benefits from <strong>the</strong> major land use<br />

activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region, namely <strong>tourism</strong> and wildlife <strong>management</strong>. As a result, local<br />

communities have developed negative attitudes towards wildlife <strong>management</strong> and<br />

<strong>tourism</strong>, and do not support <strong>the</strong> government policies, such as <strong>the</strong> Tourism Policy <strong>of</strong><br />

1990, which dictate <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dustries. This situation makes <strong>the</strong> current<br />

390

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!