the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

communities will develop positive attitudes towards natural resources and, hence, use them sustainably. In assessing the local community attitudes towards natural resources, studies conducted in both Botswana and Southern Africa were considered. Mordi (1991) and Perkins and Ringrose (1996), for example, state that attitudes and perceptions of the local people within Ngamiland District are generally negative towards wildlife conservation. Findings by Mwenya et al (1991) regarding the situation in Zimbabwe show that people's attitudes are largely based on the personal or community ownership they attach to wildlife resources (Mbaiwa, 2004). However, according to Mbaiwa (2004), within the Okavango Delta area itself, communities are increasingly developing positive attitudes towards natural resource conservation. For example, Mbaiwa (2004) states that, within the three villages of Khwai, Seronga and Ditshiping (all of which are part of the CBNRM programme) 60.9 percent of the local inhabitants interviewed felt that it was necessary to have wildlife resources in the grasslands and forests of the Okavango Delta. Respondents argued that wildlife attracts tourists to the area and tourism creates employment opportunities, development, and generates revenue. Hence, the respondents view wildlife as a valuable resource. On the other hand, 37.6 percent of the local inhabitants interviewed within these three villages stated that they did not support the existence of wildlife within the Okavango Delta. These respondents regard wildlife as being destructive to their crops and livestock, as well as spreading disease to livestock. They also stated that the existence of wildlife in the area has led to much of their land being occupied by foreign tourism investors, from which they generally derive very little, or nothing at all (Mbaiwa, 2004). The Department of Wildlife and National Parks in Maun noted that ever since the introduction of the CBNRM programme in the Okavango area there has been a reduction in poaching statistics. This demonstrates that local communities are starting to place increasing value upon wildlife resources, which helps to encourage the sustainable use of the resource within their local environment. According to the DWNP, local attitudes and perceptions within the Okavango Delta are slowly beginning to change, from negative views on wildlife conservation, to positive perceptions of sustainable, local natural resource use and management (Mbaiwa, 2004). 340

7.4 Summary and Conclusion While the implementation of CBNRM projects in the Okavango Delta has problems, it is still too early and unrealistic to assess and pass judgement that these projects have completely failed. They have only been operating for less than a decade, and the mere fact that there is an operating CBNRM programme in Botswana can, in itself, be considered a success (Mbaiwa, 2002). CBNRM in the Okavango Delta has succeeded in income generation, employment creation and the establishment of local institutions meant to ensure local participation in natural resource management and tourism development. CBNRM has also succeeded in determining the economic value of natural resources in the Okavango Delta. The high economic value placed on natural resources, especially wildlife, has started to result in the development of positive attitudes, by the rural communities towards natural resource conservation, particularly wildlife. Even though there have been socio-economic, political and conservation benefits achieved through the implementation of CBNRM in the Okavango Delta, the sustainability of the programme remains questionable. However, in the event that all stakeholders (e.g., government, community-based organisations, private sector and non-governmental organisations) share information, building communications networks in promoting trusts and transparent decision making is carried out, it is possible for CBNRM to ultimately achieve its objective (Mbaiwa, 2004). This chapter provided an overview of the present day use of natural resources by the local communities in the Okavango Delta. It presented an analysis of the critical issues relating to current natural resource utilisation and management structures in the Okavango, focusing in particular on tourism's impact upon the Delta's natural resources. Lastly, it provided an overview of the Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) programme in the Okavango Delta and discussed in detail the issues associated with the implementation of this programme and its role in natural resource management. The next chapter provides a detailed overview of the socio-cultural and environmental impacts arising from the development of the tourism industry in the Okavango Delta, and focuses on the current and future threats facing the Okavango Delta and its resources. 341

communities will develop positive attitudes towards <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s and, hence,<br />

use <strong>the</strong>m susta<strong>in</strong>ably. In assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> local community attitudes towards <strong>natural</strong><br />

<strong>resource</strong>s, studies conducted <strong>in</strong> both Botswana and Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa were<br />

considered. Mordi (1991) and Perk<strong>in</strong>s and R<strong>in</strong>grose (1996), for example, state that<br />

attitudes and perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local people with<strong>in</strong> Ngamiland District are generally<br />

negative towards wildlife conservation. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs by Mwenya et al (1991) regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe show that people's attitudes are largely based on <strong>the</strong><br />

personal or community ownership <strong>the</strong>y attach to wildlife <strong>resource</strong>s (Mbaiwa, 2004).<br />

However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mbaiwa (2004), with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta area itself,<br />

communities are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly develop<strong>in</strong>g positive attitudes towards <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong><br />

conservation. For example, Mbaiwa (2004) states that, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three villages <strong>of</strong><br />

Khwai, Seronga and Ditship<strong>in</strong>g (all <strong>of</strong> which are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBNRM programme)<br />

60.9 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong>terviewed felt that it was necessary to have<br />

wildlife <strong>resource</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grasslands and forests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta.<br />

Respondents argued that wildlife attracts tourists to <strong>the</strong> area and <strong>tourism</strong> creates<br />

employment opportunities, development, and generates revenue. Hence, <strong>the</strong><br />

respondents view wildlife as a valuable <strong>resource</strong>. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, 37.6 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> local <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong>terviewed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three villages stated that <strong>the</strong>y did not<br />

support <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> wildlife with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta. These respondents<br />

regard wildlife as be<strong>in</strong>g destructive to <strong>the</strong>ir crops and livestock, as well as spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

disease to livestock. They also stated that <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> wildlife <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area has<br />

led to much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir land be<strong>in</strong>g occupied by foreign <strong>tourism</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestors, from which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y generally derive very little, or noth<strong>in</strong>g at all (Mbaiwa, 2004).<br />

The Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and National Parks <strong>in</strong> Maun noted that ever s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBNRM programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango area <strong>the</strong>re has been a<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> poach<strong>in</strong>g statistics. This demonstrates that local communities are<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g to place <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g value upon wildlife <strong>resource</strong>s, which helps to encourage<br />

<strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>resource</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir local environment. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

DWNP, local attitudes and perceptions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta are slowly<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to change, from negative views on wildlife conservation, to positive<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able, local <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong> use and <strong>management</strong> (Mbaiwa,<br />

2004).<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!