16.08.2013 Views

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cheaply from communities <strong>in</strong> Ngamiland District. For example, <strong>in</strong> 1998, a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

elephant that a safari hunt<strong>in</strong>g operator bought at Pula 22 000 (US $ 4500) from a<br />

community quota, was sold at US $ 50 000 (Pula 250 000) to spot hunters from<br />

Europe. In 2000 an elephant cost Pula 40 000 (US $ 8000) to buy from community<br />

quotas, which was <strong>the</strong>n sold for US $ 80 000 (Pula 400000) to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

commercial hunters (Mbaiwa, 2002).<br />

7.3.7.3 Poor Distribution <strong>of</strong> CBNRM F<strong>in</strong>ancial and Employment Benefits<br />

The poor distribution <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial and employment benefits from CBNRM projects is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> critical issues affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBNRM programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Okavango Delta. Many community members who are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> CBNRM projects<br />

receive no f<strong>in</strong>ancial, employment or food benefits from CBNRM at a household level.<br />

For example, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mbaiwa (2004), 52.1 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> households <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

three villages <strong>of</strong> Ditship<strong>in</strong>g, Khwai and Seronga, who are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> OKMCT,<br />

KDT and OCT community-based projects respectively (Table 7.10) stated that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

do not receive any benefits from <strong>the</strong> CBNRM projects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir villages. The highest<br />

figures were <strong>in</strong> Ditship<strong>in</strong>g and Seronga where 78.1 percent and 50.9 percent,<br />

respectively, said that <strong>the</strong>y derived no benefits from CBNRM projects. The rest <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> respondents stated that <strong>the</strong>y derive benefits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> meat, <strong>in</strong>come and<br />

employment from CBNRM.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mbaiwa (2004), at a community level, <strong>the</strong> village <strong>of</strong> Ditship<strong>in</strong>g does not<br />

benefit significantly from CBNRM through <strong>the</strong> OKMCT. Community members noted<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y do derive <strong>the</strong> expected benefits such as <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> trust vehicles and <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> community-projects that were promised when jo<strong>in</strong>t-venture<br />

partnerships with safari operators were made. Most members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ditship<strong>in</strong>g<br />

community are also not clear as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y should receive benefits through <strong>the</strong><br />

CBNRM project as <strong>in</strong>dividual households or as a community as a whole, from <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

trust (Mbaiwa, 2004).<br />

The Gudigwa community, which is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OCT (Table 7.10), and consists largely<br />

<strong>of</strong> Basarwa or San (Bushmen) <strong>in</strong>dividuals, also does not receive any significant<br />

benefits from CBNRM. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Taylor (2001), <strong>the</strong> Gudigwa community do not<br />

receive <strong>the</strong>ir fair share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefits that accrue to <strong>the</strong> OCT from <strong>the</strong> sub-leas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!