16.08.2013 Views

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7.6: Livestock Ownership <strong>in</strong> Khwai, Mababe and Sankuyo (1999)<br />

Village Own Livestock No Livestock Total<br />

Khwai 3 (9.4%) 29 (90.6%) 32 (100%)<br />

Mababe 15 (48.4%) 16 (51.6%) 31 (100%)<br />

Sankuyo 18 (56.2%) 14 (43.8%) 32 (100%)<br />

Total 36 (37.9%) 59 (62.1%) 95 (100%)<br />

Source: Adapted from Mbaiwa, 1999, P. 119.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 36 <strong>in</strong>dividuals that owned livestock <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three villages also stated that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir livestock had ei<strong>the</strong>r been killed or <strong>in</strong>jured by wildlife, particularly lion,<br />

leopard, hyena or jackal between 1996 and 1999. Of <strong>the</strong>se 36 <strong>in</strong>dividuals, 24.2<br />

percent stated that <strong>the</strong>y reported <strong>the</strong>ir loss/damage to <strong>the</strong> DWN P but did not receive<br />

any compensation. Only 6.3 percent stated that <strong>the</strong>y did receive compensation from<br />

<strong>the</strong> DWNP, but were not happy with <strong>the</strong> compensation. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 69.5 percent<br />

did not report <strong>the</strong>ir stock damage to <strong>the</strong> DWNP (Mbaiwa, 1999).<br />

The same reasons were given as for crop damage, as to why people are reluctant to<br />

report damage or loss from wildlife to <strong>the</strong> DWNP. These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />

compensation amounts, a lack <strong>of</strong> response, or delayed responses from <strong>the</strong> DWNP,<br />

as well as complicated bureaucratic processes that <strong>in</strong>dividuals have to go through to<br />

apply for compensation. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> DWNP Annual Report <strong>of</strong> 1996/97,<br />

approximately Pula 1.8 million worth <strong>of</strong> compensation claims were left unpaid from<br />

1995 onwards due to <strong>the</strong> limited government budget awarded to <strong>the</strong> DWNP for<br />

compensation claims, which stood at just Pula 816 000 for 1995/96 and Pula 936<br />

000 for 1996/97. Compensation is also only paid out for damage caused by specific<br />

animals (schedule 9), namely lion, leopard, elephant, buffalo, rh<strong>in</strong>ocerous,<br />

hippopotamus and crocodile. Hence, farmers who experience loss or damage from<br />

animals such as hyena and jackal - which is quite common - do not qualify for<br />

compensation (Mbaiwa, 1999). Table 7.7 shows <strong>the</strong> compensation rates for livestock<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 1996/97.<br />

298

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!