the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
• • • • • • • • Death of wildlife and domestic stock, including animals burnt to death along veterinary fences while trying to escape (several thousand animals are burnt to death along fences throughout Botswana each winter or dry season); Disruption of natural migration patterns; Habitat loss - Animals flee burnt areas and overcrowd unburned areas, resulting in unhealthy competition, reduced breeding rates, overgrazing, etc.; Exposure of floodplains and subsequent increase in evapo-transpiration rates; Soil composition change; Sheet erosion; 7.2.1.2 Fences Ash poisoning leading to 'dead-water' and possibly fish die-off; and Loss of human life and property (OPWT, 1998). Ill-placed veterinary fences, constructed without environmental or social impact assessments continue to trap and kill significant numbers of wildlife. Fragmentation, obstruction of vital territorial and migratory movements, loss of access to critical resources, among other impacts, causes severe stress, increasing death rates and decreasing birth rates. Irreversible population declines have occurred and appear to be ongoing (OPWT, 1998). Severe declines in the number of roan antelope, eland, wildebeest and giraffe have been observed recently along newly constructed fences in the Ngamiland District. Continued impacts threaten the demise of the remaining wildlife populations to the west and north of the Okavango Delta (OPWT, 1998). 7.2.1.3 Cattle Ranching Plans to develop private, commercial cattle ranches to the west and north of the Delta are a threat to wildlife populations. Such developments will further fragment habitats, block migration routes, displace local communities and generally lead to 284
environmental degradation. If the Okavango Delta and its wildlife is to remain a healthy, functioning and protected ecosystem, the areas surrounding the Delta must also be conserved. The Okavango Delta is too complex an ecosystem to survive as a 'protected island' surrounded by commercial development (OPWT, 1998). 7.2.1.4 Hunting The Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), faced with the task of monitoring wildlife management in Ngamiland, is severely constrained in terms of manpower and resources, and hence cannot monitor the hunting industry in the Okavango Delta effectively. Consequently, uncontrolled hunting, based on unscientific methods and quotas are having a negative impact on biomass and diversity. Specific impacts include: • Over-hunting; • Selective species hunting, causing imbalances; • Hunting during the mating season. Removal of territorial breeding animals and harassment, affecting reproduction patterns and rates; and • Hunting of prime and immature male animals, thereby affecting the gene pool (OPWT, 1998). Elephant range increased as a result of the ban imposed on elephant hunting in 1983, after which elephants gradually moved out of the Moremi Game Reserve and Chobe National park into the then again safe areas throughout the whole of northern Botswana. However, since elephant hunting was reintroduced in 1996 this process is already beginning to reverse. Elephant are once again starting to concentrate only in non-hunting areas, such as the Moremi Game Reserve, Chobe National Park and the photographic concession areas in the Okavango Delta. This is leading to habitat degradation through the over-population of elephant in these areas. The congestion of elephant in the Moremi Game Reserve during the years prior to 1983, caused the destruction of the Acacia eri%ba, Acacia tortilis, Acacia nigrescens and Hyphaene ventricosa (real fan palm - used heavily in basket making) populations of the reserve (OPWT, 1998). 285
- Page 258 and 259: With regards to tourist/visitor num
- Page 260 and 261: European and North American origin,
- Page 262: most direct economic impacts of tou
- Page 265 and 266: Table 6.9: Number of Accommodation
- Page 267 and 268: tend to vary in terms of standards
- Page 269 and 270: Safari hunters or spot (commercial)
- Page 271 and 272: validated by the Tawana Land Board
- Page 273 and 274: companies, 6 (40 percent) to jointl
- Page 275 and 276: Lastly, wildlife tends to congregat
- Page 277 and 278: Table 6.17: Major Safari Companies/
- Page 279 and 280: indicates that Botswana has more ar
- Page 281 and 282: 6.4 The Economic Impact of Tourism
- Page 283 and 284: weakest with agriculture, construct
- Page 285 and 286: As noted earlier, the greater major
- Page 287 and 288: Table 6.25: Estimated Tourism-Relat
- Page 289 and 290: evenue collection from the various
- Page 291 and 292: Despite these conflicting employmen
- Page 294 and 295: According to the study carried out
- Page 296 and 297: management positions in the tourism
- Page 298 and 299: Seventy four percent of the 50 loca
- Page 300 and 301: Table 6.33: List of Private Air Cha
- Page 302 and 303: CHAPTER SEVEN Natural Resource Util
- Page 304 and 305: natural resources of water and pris
- Page 306 and 307: According to personal interviews co
- Page 310 and 311: Experience shows that some animals,
- Page 312 and 313: inhabitants of the Okavango Delta r
- Page 314 and 315: control is vested with central gove
- Page 316 and 317: conservation area. This led to conf
- Page 318 and 319: Table 7.4: Main Stakeholders, Land
- Page 320 and 321: 7.2.3.1 Arable Farming and Wildlife
- Page 322 and 323: Table 7.6: Livestock Ownership in K
- Page 324 and 325: Furthermore, the NCS has failed to
- Page 326 and 327: Botswana because populations of bot
- Page 328 and 329: Delta, while previously inhabitants
- Page 330 and 331: facilities that do not have boats,
- Page 332 and 333: • • • • • 7.2.6 Since the
- Page 334: different products, wood is perhaps
- Page 337 and 338: Today, Hyphaene petersiana palms as
- Page 339 and 340: populations in the rivers have drop
- Page 341 and 342: The importance of people remaining
- Page 343 and 344: CBNRM aims at alleviating poverty a
- Page 345 and 346: the wildlife populations and their
- Page 347 and 348: no longer an important livelihood s
- Page 349 and 350: • • • • • • 7.3.4 Clari
- Page 351 and 352: Leases are given for 15 year period
- Page 353 and 354: Table 7.10: Community-Based Organis
- Page 355 and 356: 7.3.6.3 The Okavango Paler's Trust
- Page 357 and 358: at the same time allowing them to d
environmental degradation. If <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta and its wildlife is to rema<strong>in</strong> a<br />
healthy, function<strong>in</strong>g and protected ecosystem, <strong>the</strong> areas surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Delta must<br />
also be conserved. The Okavango Delta is too complex an ecosystem to survive as<br />
a 'protected island' surrounded by commercial development (OPWT, 1998).<br />
7.2.1.4 Hunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), faced with <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong><br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g wildlife <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ngamiland, is severely constra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />
manpower and <strong>resource</strong>s, and hence cannot monitor <strong>the</strong> hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Okavango Delta effectively. Consequently, uncontrolled hunt<strong>in</strong>g, based on<br />
unscientific methods and quotas are hav<strong>in</strong>g a negative impact on biomass and<br />
diversity. Specific impacts <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• Over-hunt<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
• Selective species hunt<strong>in</strong>g, caus<strong>in</strong>g imbalances;<br />
• Hunt<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mat<strong>in</strong>g season. Removal <strong>of</strong> territorial breed<strong>in</strong>g animals<br />
and harassment, affect<strong>in</strong>g reproduction patterns and rates; and<br />
• Hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> prime and immature male animals, <strong>the</strong>reby affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gene<br />
pool (OPWT, 1998).<br />
Elephant range <strong>in</strong>creased as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ban imposed on elephant hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
1983, after which elephants gradually moved out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Moremi Game Reserve and<br />
Chobe National park <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n aga<strong>in</strong> safe areas throughout <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
Botswana. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce elephant hunt<strong>in</strong>g was re<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 1996 this process<br />
is already beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to reverse. Elephant are once aga<strong>in</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g to concentrate only<br />
<strong>in</strong> non-hunt<strong>in</strong>g areas, such as <strong>the</strong> Moremi Game Reserve, Chobe National Park and<br />
<strong>the</strong> photographic concession areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta. This is lead<strong>in</strong>g to habitat<br />
degradation through <strong>the</strong> over-population <strong>of</strong> elephant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas. The congestion<br />
<strong>of</strong> elephant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Moremi Game Reserve dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> years prior to 1983, caused <strong>the</strong><br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Acacia eri%ba, Acacia tortilis, Acacia nigrescens and Hyphaene<br />
ventricosa (real fan palm - used heavily <strong>in</strong> basket mak<strong>in</strong>g) populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
reserve (OPWT, 1998).<br />
285