the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
production and consumption in even the most remote communities - seemingly peripheral to, and detached from, the world economy". 3.2 Creating Tourist Spaces: From Modernity to Globalisation 3.2.1 Conceptualising Modernity Modernity, as a form of both social order and conceptualising the world, is conventionally dated from the enlightenment period of the late seventeenth century. With the emergence of a capitalist system in the nineteenth century, industrialisation began replacing traditional forms of social organisation and this necessitated new ways of organising labour based on the routinisation of work, rationalisation of production, and a growing bureaucracy (Giddens, 1991; Lyon, 1999). Such developments have been described as a consequence of differentiation; the increasing specialisation of particular functions, which is based on the principle that social relations in modernity were fundamentally different to those of pre-modern times. In pre-modern times, for example, social arrangements, the domestic sphere of family and home constituted the unit of production. In modernity however, work was split from the home and became regulated as wage labour. This regulation in turn was organised around 'clock time' rather than the pre-modern seasonal rhythm of agricultural production (Lyon, 1999). Apart from this splitting of work from the home, a differentiation between home and leisure also began to occur (Meethan, 2001 ). With regard to the spatial organisation of modernity, urbanisation was a key development. This enabled factory production to increase economies of scale, additionally providing a focus for political activity through the development of forms of local government, and a source of civic identity through the provision of centralised social and leisure facilities. Urbanisation also led to the development of mass markets whose consumption needs were satisfied through mass factory production. Labour relations also experienced various changes. Factory production was different from that to fulfil the needs of both individuals and families, and labour became regulated through forms of contracts. Access to commodities was regulated through a wage economy. Hence, from a classic Marxist viewpoint, people were 82
alienated from the means of production and social relations were mediated, in effect disguised, through commodity forms (Craib, 1997; Meethan, 2001). Modernity is naturally also associated with the concept of progress and change, particularly the notion of a linear path to social development in which the pre-modern is swept aside by the progressive march of modernity which, as Harvey (1989) states, "...has no respect for its own past" (p. 226). The notion that modernity constitutes a fundamental break with the past, not only of organisational forms but also in conceptual terms, creates a distinction between the modern and the traditional. Another element to be viewed is the nation state. In simplest terms, nation states can be viewed as 'natural' entities, which contain a certain set of essential characteristics shared by its inhabitants that forms a distinct national culture. However, such assessments themselves are products of modernity and tend to be set in sharp contrast to the pre-modern or primitive. In this way both the 'primitive' and the 'traditional' become seen as the antithesis of modernity, and this is a fundamental categorisation that not only underpins many forms of tourism, but also many forms of tourism analysis. Concepts of alienation, the division between the past and the present, the modern and the primitive still influence the manner in which many forms of tourism are considered and analysed. Despite the tendency to think in terms of epochs, such as modernity or postmodernity, as with all broad classifications of history, there is a danger of assuming that, for example, modernity not only consisted of a set of definable characteristics, but more importantly, that the application of these characteristics was both universal and simultaneous. The spread of modernity, or even industrial capitalism, was an uneven process, which in turn has consequences in terms of both globalisation and development (Meethan, 2001 ). 3.2.2 Tourist Spaces of Modernity Even though it is possible to see the roots of modern tourism in the Grand Tours of the eighteenth century, it was the creation of the European seaside resorts from the early nineteenth century onwards that established the dominant pattern for mass tourism (Walton, 1983; Walton, 1997; Urry, 1990). The first resorts became 'watering 83
- Page 57 and 58: tourism, the type of skills that ar
- Page 59 and 60: Despite the various economic benefi
- Page 61 and 62: Some cultural modifications due to
- Page 63 and 64: 2.8.5 Environmental Benefits of Tou
- Page 65 and 66: However, as Gunn (1994) points out,
- Page 67 and 68: or displacing another group of user
- Page 69 and 70: protection of the environment was t
- Page 71 and 72: These range from the numerous impac
- Page 73 and 74: difficult to foresee and which refl
- Page 75 and 76: carried unintentionally on the shoe
- Page 77 and 78: Pyrenees (Smith and Jenner, 1989).
- Page 79 and 80: waste is being developed or upgrade
- Page 81 and 82: water, however, inhibits the natura
- Page 83 and 84: arrivals and Riccione hoteliers alo
- Page 85 and 86: 1981). Butler (1991) recognises tha
- Page 87 and 88: economic growth in developed countr
- Page 89 and 90: infinite or infinitely renewable 'f
- Page 91 and 92: also be described as a 'deep ecolog
- Page 93 and 94: Having highlighted the general conc
- Page 95 and 96: • • • • • • Follow ethi
- Page 97 and 98: The English Tourist Board (1991, ci
- Page 99 and 100: as ideas and technologies on the pa
- Page 101 and 102: eap net benefits, tourism can be cl
- Page 103 and 104: 2.14 Summary and Conclusion This ch
- Page 105: conceptualised as a global process
- Page 109 and 110: extent that the quality of life wit
- Page 111 and 112: The successful creation or inventio
- Page 113 and 114: modern production, it has moved awa
- Page 115 and 116: As previously discussed, the proces
- Page 117 and 118: The origination of world-standardis
- Page 119 and 120: attraction to less developed econom
- Page 121 and 122: Hence, the government must take act
- Page 123 and 124: develop with other sectors of the e
- Page 125 and 126: Methodology 4.1 Introduction CHAPTE
- Page 127 and 128: hypothesised, further, that tourism
- Page 129 and 130: Qualitative research within the fie
- Page 131 and 132: 4.7 Sample In order to test the hyp
- Page 133 and 134: 4.8.2 Structured Questionnaire Meth
- Page 136 and 137: 4.9 Methods of Data Collation, Synt
- Page 138: development and changes in traditio
- Page 141: Review of selected international an
- Page 144 and 145: diminishing returns of extractive i
- Page 146 and 147: Figure 5.1: Map of Botswana Source:
- Page 148 and 149: ate and economic progress seldom pa
- Page 150 and 151: percent growth targeted in Vision 2
- Page 152 and 153: informal sector work, especially in
- Page 154 and 155: Table 5.1: Land UselTenure in Botsw
production and consumption <strong>in</strong> even <strong>the</strong> most remote communities - seem<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
peripheral to, and detached from, <strong>the</strong> world economy".<br />
3.2 Creat<strong>in</strong>g Tourist Spaces: From Modernity to Globalisation<br />
3.2.1 Conceptualis<strong>in</strong>g Modernity<br />
Modernity, as a form <strong>of</strong> both social order and conceptualis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> world, is<br />
conventionally dated from <strong>the</strong> enlightenment period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late seventeenth century.<br />
With <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> a capitalist system <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, <strong>in</strong>dustrialisation<br />
began replac<strong>in</strong>g traditional forms <strong>of</strong> social organisation and this necessitated new<br />
ways <strong>of</strong> organis<strong>in</strong>g labour based on <strong>the</strong> rout<strong>in</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> work, rationalisation <strong>of</strong><br />
production, and a grow<strong>in</strong>g bureaucracy (Giddens, 1991; Lyon, 1999). Such<br />
developments have been described as a consequence <strong>of</strong> differentiation; <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g specialisation <strong>of</strong> particular functions, which is based on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that<br />
social relations <strong>in</strong> modernity were fundamentally different to those <strong>of</strong> pre-modern<br />
times. In pre-modern times, for example, social arrangements, <strong>the</strong> domestic sphere<br />
<strong>of</strong> family and home constituted <strong>the</strong> unit <strong>of</strong> production. In modernity however, work<br />
was split from <strong>the</strong> home and became regulated as wage labour. This regulation <strong>in</strong><br />
turn was organised around 'clock time' ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> pre-modern seasonal rhythm<br />
<strong>of</strong> agricultural production (Lyon, 1999). Apart from this splitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> work from <strong>the</strong><br />
home, a differentiation between home and leisure also began to occur (Meethan,<br />
2001 ).<br />
With regard to <strong>the</strong> spatial organisation <strong>of</strong> modernity, urbanisation was a key<br />
development. This enabled factory production to <strong>in</strong>crease economies <strong>of</strong> scale,<br />
additionally provid<strong>in</strong>g a focus for political activity through <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> local government, and a source <strong>of</strong> civic identity through <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong><br />
centralised social and leisure facilities. Urbanisation also led to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />
mass markets whose consumption needs were satisfied through mass factory<br />
production. Labour relations also experienced various changes. Factory production<br />
was different from that to fulfil <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividuals and families, and labour<br />
became regulated through forms <strong>of</strong> contracts. Access to commodities was regulated<br />
through a wage economy. Hence, from a classic Marxist viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, people were<br />
82