the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

production and consumption in even the most remote communities - seemingly peripheral to, and detached from, the world economy". 3.2 Creating Tourist Spaces: From Modernity to Globalisation 3.2.1 Conceptualising Modernity Modernity, as a form of both social order and conceptualising the world, is conventionally dated from the enlightenment period of the late seventeenth century. With the emergence of a capitalist system in the nineteenth century, industrialisation began replacing traditional forms of social organisation and this necessitated new ways of organising labour based on the routinisation of work, rationalisation of production, and a growing bureaucracy (Giddens, 1991; Lyon, 1999). Such developments have been described as a consequence of differentiation; the increasing specialisation of particular functions, which is based on the principle that social relations in modernity were fundamentally different to those of pre-modern times. In pre-modern times, for example, social arrangements, the domestic sphere of family and home constituted the unit of production. In modernity however, work was split from the home and became regulated as wage labour. This regulation in turn was organised around 'clock time' rather than the pre-modern seasonal rhythm of agricultural production (Lyon, 1999). Apart from this splitting of work from the home, a differentiation between home and leisure also began to occur (Meethan, 2001 ). With regard to the spatial organisation of modernity, urbanisation was a key development. This enabled factory production to increase economies of scale, additionally providing a focus for political activity through the development of forms of local government, and a source of civic identity through the provision of centralised social and leisure facilities. Urbanisation also led to the development of mass markets whose consumption needs were satisfied through mass factory production. Labour relations also experienced various changes. Factory production was different from that to fulfil the needs of both individuals and families, and labour became regulated through forms of contracts. Access to commodities was regulated through a wage economy. Hence, from a classic Marxist viewpoint, people were 82

alienated from the means of production and social relations were mediated, in effect disguised, through commodity forms (Craib, 1997; Meethan, 2001). Modernity is naturally also associated with the concept of progress and change, particularly the notion of a linear path to social development in which the pre-modern is swept aside by the progressive march of modernity which, as Harvey (1989) states, "...has no respect for its own past" (p. 226). The notion that modernity constitutes a fundamental break with the past, not only of organisational forms but also in conceptual terms, creates a distinction between the modern and the traditional. Another element to be viewed is the nation state. In simplest terms, nation states can be viewed as 'natural' entities, which contain a certain set of essential characteristics shared by its inhabitants that forms a distinct national culture. However, such assessments themselves are products of modernity and tend to be set in sharp contrast to the pre-modern or primitive. In this way both the 'primitive' and the 'traditional' become seen as the antithesis of modernity, and this is a fundamental categorisation that not only underpins many forms of tourism, but also many forms of tourism analysis. Concepts of alienation, the division between the past and the present, the modern and the primitive still influence the manner in which many forms of tourism are considered and analysed. Despite the tendency to think in terms of epochs, such as modernity or postmodernity, as with all broad classifications of history, there is a danger of assuming that, for example, modernity not only consisted of a set of definable characteristics, but more importantly, that the application of these characteristics was both universal and simultaneous. The spread of modernity, or even industrial capitalism, was an uneven process, which in turn has consequences in terms of both globalisation and development (Meethan, 2001 ). 3.2.2 Tourist Spaces of Modernity Even though it is possible to see the roots of modern tourism in the Grand Tours of the eighteenth century, it was the creation of the European seaside resorts from the early nineteenth century onwards that established the dominant pattern for mass tourism (Walton, 1983; Walton, 1997; Urry, 1990). The first resorts became 'watering 83

production and consumption <strong>in</strong> even <strong>the</strong> most remote communities - seem<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

peripheral to, and detached from, <strong>the</strong> world economy".<br />

3.2 Creat<strong>in</strong>g Tourist Spaces: From Modernity to Globalisation<br />

3.2.1 Conceptualis<strong>in</strong>g Modernity<br />

Modernity, as a form <strong>of</strong> both social order and conceptualis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> world, is<br />

conventionally dated from <strong>the</strong> enlightenment period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late seventeenth century.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> a capitalist system <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, <strong>in</strong>dustrialisation<br />

began replac<strong>in</strong>g traditional forms <strong>of</strong> social organisation and this necessitated new<br />

ways <strong>of</strong> organis<strong>in</strong>g labour based on <strong>the</strong> rout<strong>in</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> work, rationalisation <strong>of</strong><br />

production, and a grow<strong>in</strong>g bureaucracy (Giddens, 1991; Lyon, 1999). Such<br />

developments have been described as a consequence <strong>of</strong> differentiation; <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g specialisation <strong>of</strong> particular functions, which is based on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that<br />

social relations <strong>in</strong> modernity were fundamentally different to those <strong>of</strong> pre-modern<br />

times. In pre-modern times, for example, social arrangements, <strong>the</strong> domestic sphere<br />

<strong>of</strong> family and home constituted <strong>the</strong> unit <strong>of</strong> production. In modernity however, work<br />

was split from <strong>the</strong> home and became regulated as wage labour. This regulation <strong>in</strong><br />

turn was organised around 'clock time' ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> pre-modern seasonal rhythm<br />

<strong>of</strong> agricultural production (Lyon, 1999). Apart from this splitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> work from <strong>the</strong><br />

home, a differentiation between home and leisure also began to occur (Meethan,<br />

2001 ).<br />

With regard to <strong>the</strong> spatial organisation <strong>of</strong> modernity, urbanisation was a key<br />

development. This enabled factory production to <strong>in</strong>crease economies <strong>of</strong> scale,<br />

additionally provid<strong>in</strong>g a focus for political activity through <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> local government, and a source <strong>of</strong> civic identity through <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong><br />

centralised social and leisure facilities. Urbanisation also led to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

mass markets whose consumption needs were satisfied through mass factory<br />

production. Labour relations also experienced various changes. Factory production<br />

was different from that to fulfil <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> both <strong>in</strong>dividuals and families, and labour<br />

became regulated through forms <strong>of</strong> contracts. Access to commodities was regulated<br />

through a wage economy. Hence, from a classic Marxist viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, people were<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!