the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...
For the greater majority of the rural poor, survival depends on combining agriculture with a diverse range of other livelihood activities. An important challenge is to identify and stimulate sources of growth in the non-farm economy, while also helping farmers to adapt to opportunities within more globalised commercial agriculture. Yet effective strategies for achieving diversified rural growth in poor parts of Africa are still proving elusive to government and donors alike (Ashley and Elliott, 2003). Rural communities are pressed to generate growth in the face of economic restructuring, declining government services and funding, and threats to their natural resources. As such, rural tourism is becoming increasingly attractive as a mechanism for meeting these challenges, and growing numbers of planners, practitioners and academics believe that the future of rural communities rest with the economic, social and political opportunities created through tourism (Mair et aI, 2001 ). Many Third World governments view tourism as an important opportunity to diversify local economies. It can develop in poor and marginal areas with few other export and diversification options. Remote areas particularly attract tourists because of their high cultural, wildlife and landscape value. Tourism offers labour-intensive and small-scale opportunities compared with other non-agricultural activities, employs a high proportion of women, and values natural resources and culture, which may feature among the few assets belonging to the poor (Deloitte and Touche, 1999; Ashley et aI, 2000). However, the poorest may gain few direct benefits from tourism while bearing many of the costs. It is therefore important to mitigate these costs, while maximising the benefits to the poor. Strategies for promoting pro-poor tourism are emerging, suggesting that there is potential for much to be done. In the past, the search for market niches (e.g., eco-tourism, cultural tourism) has been dominant. Strategies to enhance net benefits to the poor need to be developed across the whole industry, drawing on a range of expertise to encourage pro-poor growth (Ashley et aI, 2000). Pro-poor tourism (PPT) can be defined as "...tourism that generates net benefits for the poor, which may be economic, social or environmental. As long as poor people 76
eap net benefits, tourism can be classified as 'pro-poor' (even if richer people benefit more that poorer people)" (PPT, 2003, p. 7). The British Department for International Development (DFID) was the first agency to promote the concept of PPT in 1999, focusing on strategies that enhance benefits and unlock opportunities for the poor, rather than expanding the overall size of the sector (Ashley et aI, 2001). Tourism's potential for being 'pro-poor' lies with four key factors: • Tourism is a diverse industry, which increases the scope for wide participation, including the participation of the informal sector; • The customer comes to the product, which provides considerable opportunities for linkages (e.g., souvenir selling); • Tourism is highly dependent upon natural capital (e.g., wildlife, culture), which are assets that the poor may have access to, even in the absence of financial resources; and • Tourism can be more labour intensive than such industries as manufacturing. In comparison to other modern sectors, a higher proportion of tourism benefits (e.g., jobs, informal trade opportunities) go to women (Ashley et aI, 2001). Strategies for pro-poor tourism can be divided into those that generate three different types of local benefits. These are economic benefits, other livelihood benefits (such as physical, social or cultural improvements), and less tangible benefits of participation and involvement. 2.13.2 Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Coupled with the growing global recognition for the need for local participation and empowerment in order to address issues of poverty and bring about sustainable forms of development, has been a paradigm shift in conservation and natural 77
- Page 50 and 51: The first assumption is largely bas
- Page 52 and 53: However, as Western (1993) points o
- Page 54: Fourth, tourism may bring about dev
- Page 57 and 58: tourism, the type of skills that ar
- Page 59 and 60: Despite the various economic benefi
- Page 61 and 62: Some cultural modifications due to
- Page 63 and 64: 2.8.5 Environmental Benefits of Tou
- Page 65 and 66: However, as Gunn (1994) points out,
- Page 67 and 68: or displacing another group of user
- Page 69 and 70: protection of the environment was t
- Page 71 and 72: These range from the numerous impac
- Page 73 and 74: difficult to foresee and which refl
- Page 75 and 76: carried unintentionally on the shoe
- Page 77 and 78: Pyrenees (Smith and Jenner, 1989).
- Page 79 and 80: waste is being developed or upgrade
- Page 81 and 82: water, however, inhibits the natura
- Page 83 and 84: arrivals and Riccione hoteliers alo
- Page 85 and 86: 1981). Butler (1991) recognises tha
- Page 87 and 88: economic growth in developed countr
- Page 89 and 90: infinite or infinitely renewable 'f
- Page 91 and 92: also be described as a 'deep ecolog
- Page 93 and 94: Having highlighted the general conc
- Page 95 and 96: • • • • • • Follow ethi
- Page 97 and 98: The English Tourist Board (1991, ci
- Page 99: as ideas and technologies on the pa
- Page 103 and 104: 2.14 Summary and Conclusion This ch
- Page 105 and 106: conceptualised as a global process
- Page 107 and 108: alienated from the means of product
- Page 109 and 110: extent that the quality of life wit
- Page 111 and 112: The successful creation or inventio
- Page 113 and 114: modern production, it has moved awa
- Page 115 and 116: As previously discussed, the proces
- Page 117 and 118: The origination of world-standardis
- Page 119 and 120: attraction to less developed econom
- Page 121 and 122: Hence, the government must take act
- Page 123 and 124: develop with other sectors of the e
- Page 125 and 126: Methodology 4.1 Introduction CHAPTE
- Page 127 and 128: hypothesised, further, that tourism
- Page 129 and 130: Qualitative research within the fie
- Page 131 and 132: 4.7 Sample In order to test the hyp
- Page 133 and 134: 4.8.2 Structured Questionnaire Meth
- Page 136 and 137: 4.9 Methods of Data Collation, Synt
- Page 138: development and changes in traditio
- Page 141: Review of selected international an
- Page 144 and 145: diminishing returns of extractive i
- Page 146 and 147: Figure 5.1: Map of Botswana Source:
- Page 148 and 149: ate and economic progress seldom pa
For <strong>the</strong> greater majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural poor, survival depends on comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agriculture<br />
with a diverse range <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r livelihood activities. An important challenge is to<br />
identify and stimulate sources <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-farm economy, while also help<strong>in</strong>g<br />
farmers to adapt to opportunities with<strong>in</strong> more globalised commercial agriculture. Yet<br />
effective strategies for achiev<strong>in</strong>g diversified rural growth <strong>in</strong> poor parts <strong>of</strong> Africa are<br />
still prov<strong>in</strong>g elusive to government and donors alike (Ashley and Elliott, 2003).<br />
Rural communities are pressed to generate growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
restructur<strong>in</strong>g, decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g government services and fund<strong>in</strong>g, and threats to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>natural</strong><br />
<strong>resource</strong>s. As such, rural <strong>tourism</strong> is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly attractive as a<br />
mechanism for meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se challenges, and grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers <strong>of</strong> planners,<br />
practitioners and academics believe that <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> rural communities rest with <strong>the</strong><br />
economic, social and political opportunities created through <strong>tourism</strong> (Mair et aI,<br />
2001 ).<br />
Many Third World governments view <strong>tourism</strong> as an important opportunity to diversify<br />
local economies. It can develop <strong>in</strong> poor and marg<strong>in</strong>al areas with few o<strong>the</strong>r export<br />
and diversification options. Remote areas particularly attract tourists because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
high cultural, wildlife and landscape value. Tourism <strong>of</strong>fers labour-<strong>in</strong>tensive and<br />
small-scale opportunities compared with o<strong>the</strong>r non-agricultural activities, employs a<br />
high proportion <strong>of</strong> women, and values <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s and culture, which may<br />
feature among <strong>the</strong> few assets belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> poor (Deloitte and Touche, 1999;<br />
Ashley et aI, 2000).<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> poorest may ga<strong>in</strong> few direct benefits from <strong>tourism</strong> while bear<strong>in</strong>g many<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs. It is <strong>the</strong>refore important to mitigate <strong>the</strong>se costs, while maximis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
benefits to <strong>the</strong> poor. Strategies for promot<strong>in</strong>g pro-poor <strong>tourism</strong> are emerg<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re is potential for much to be done. In <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> search for<br />
market niches (e.g., eco-<strong>tourism</strong>, cultural <strong>tourism</strong>) has been dom<strong>in</strong>ant. Strategies to<br />
enhance net benefits to <strong>the</strong> poor need to be developed across <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
draw<strong>in</strong>g on a range <strong>of</strong> expertise to encourage pro-poor growth (Ashley et aI, 2000).<br />
Pro-poor <strong>tourism</strong> (PPT) can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as "...<strong>tourism</strong> that generates net benefits for<br />
<strong>the</strong> poor, which may be economic, social or environmental. As long as poor people<br />
76