the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ... the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

For the greater majority of the rural poor, survival depends on combining agriculture with a diverse range of other livelihood activities. An important challenge is to identify and stimulate sources of growth in the non-farm economy, while also helping farmers to adapt to opportunities within more globalised commercial agriculture. Yet effective strategies for achieving diversified rural growth in poor parts of Africa are still proving elusive to government and donors alike (Ashley and Elliott, 2003). Rural communities are pressed to generate growth in the face of economic restructuring, declining government services and funding, and threats to their natural resources. As such, rural tourism is becoming increasingly attractive as a mechanism for meeting these challenges, and growing numbers of planners, practitioners and academics believe that the future of rural communities rest with the economic, social and political opportunities created through tourism (Mair et aI, 2001 ). Many Third World governments view tourism as an important opportunity to diversify local economies. It can develop in poor and marginal areas with few other export and diversification options. Remote areas particularly attract tourists because of their high cultural, wildlife and landscape value. Tourism offers labour-intensive and small-scale opportunities compared with other non-agricultural activities, employs a high proportion of women, and values natural resources and culture, which may feature among the few assets belonging to the poor (Deloitte and Touche, 1999; Ashley et aI, 2000). However, the poorest may gain few direct benefits from tourism while bearing many of the costs. It is therefore important to mitigate these costs, while maximising the benefits to the poor. Strategies for promoting pro-poor tourism are emerging, suggesting that there is potential for much to be done. In the past, the search for market niches (e.g., eco-tourism, cultural tourism) has been dominant. Strategies to enhance net benefits to the poor need to be developed across the whole industry, drawing on a range of expertise to encourage pro-poor growth (Ashley et aI, 2000). Pro-poor tourism (PPT) can be defined as "...tourism that generates net benefits for the poor, which may be economic, social or environmental. As long as poor people 76

eap net benefits, tourism can be classified as 'pro-poor' (even if richer people benefit more that poorer people)" (PPT, 2003, p. 7). The British Department for International Development (DFID) was the first agency to promote the concept of PPT in 1999, focusing on strategies that enhance benefits and unlock opportunities for the poor, rather than expanding the overall size of the sector (Ashley et aI, 2001). Tourism's potential for being 'pro-poor' lies with four key factors: • Tourism is a diverse industry, which increases the scope for wide participation, including the participation of the informal sector; • The customer comes to the product, which provides considerable opportunities for linkages (e.g., souvenir selling); • Tourism is highly dependent upon natural capital (e.g., wildlife, culture), which are assets that the poor may have access to, even in the absence of financial resources; and • Tourism can be more labour intensive than such industries as manufacturing. In comparison to other modern sectors, a higher proportion of tourism benefits (e.g., jobs, informal trade opportunities) go to women (Ashley et aI, 2001). Strategies for pro-poor tourism can be divided into those that generate three different types of local benefits. These are economic benefits, other livelihood benefits (such as physical, social or cultural improvements), and less tangible benefits of participation and involvement. 2.13.2 Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Coupled with the growing global recognition for the need for local participation and empowerment in order to address issues of poverty and bring about sustainable forms of development, has been a paradigm shift in conservation and natural 77

For <strong>the</strong> greater majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rural poor, survival depends on comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agriculture<br />

with a diverse range <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r livelihood activities. An important challenge is to<br />

identify and stimulate sources <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-farm economy, while also help<strong>in</strong>g<br />

farmers to adapt to opportunities with<strong>in</strong> more globalised commercial agriculture. Yet<br />

effective strategies for achiev<strong>in</strong>g diversified rural growth <strong>in</strong> poor parts <strong>of</strong> Africa are<br />

still prov<strong>in</strong>g elusive to government and donors alike (Ashley and Elliott, 2003).<br />

Rural communities are pressed to generate growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

restructur<strong>in</strong>g, decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g government services and fund<strong>in</strong>g, and threats to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>natural</strong><br />

<strong>resource</strong>s. As such, rural <strong>tourism</strong> is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly attractive as a<br />

mechanism for meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se challenges, and grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers <strong>of</strong> planners,<br />

practitioners and academics believe that <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> rural communities rest with <strong>the</strong><br />

economic, social and political opportunities created through <strong>tourism</strong> (Mair et aI,<br />

2001 ).<br />

Many Third World governments view <strong>tourism</strong> as an important opportunity to diversify<br />

local economies. It can develop <strong>in</strong> poor and marg<strong>in</strong>al areas with few o<strong>the</strong>r export<br />

and diversification options. Remote areas particularly attract tourists because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

high cultural, wildlife and landscape value. Tourism <strong>of</strong>fers labour-<strong>in</strong>tensive and<br />

small-scale opportunities compared with o<strong>the</strong>r non-agricultural activities, employs a<br />

high proportion <strong>of</strong> women, and values <strong>natural</strong> <strong>resource</strong>s and culture, which may<br />

feature among <strong>the</strong> few assets belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> poor (Deloitte and Touche, 1999;<br />

Ashley et aI, 2000).<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> poorest may ga<strong>in</strong> few direct benefits from <strong>tourism</strong> while bear<strong>in</strong>g many<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs. It is <strong>the</strong>refore important to mitigate <strong>the</strong>se costs, while maximis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

benefits to <strong>the</strong> poor. Strategies for promot<strong>in</strong>g pro-poor <strong>tourism</strong> are emerg<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re is potential for much to be done. In <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> search for<br />

market niches (e.g., eco-<strong>tourism</strong>, cultural <strong>tourism</strong>) has been dom<strong>in</strong>ant. Strategies to<br />

enhance net benefits to <strong>the</strong> poor need to be developed across <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

draw<strong>in</strong>g on a range <strong>of</strong> expertise to encourage pro-poor growth (Ashley et aI, 2000).<br />

Pro-poor <strong>tourism</strong> (PPT) can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as "...<strong>tourism</strong> that generates net benefits for<br />

<strong>the</strong> poor, which may be economic, social or environmental. As long as poor people<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!