Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...
make good sense (see Figure 3.1). The concept 'community ofpractice' is a constitutive element ofa broader conceptual framework, whose'analytical power' resides in its ability to integrate the components ofthe model (ibid.:6). Figure 3.1: The Elements ofWenger's Social Theory of Learning Learning as experience Learning Meaning Leaming as belonging The usefulness ofWenger's theory oflearning in a community ofpractice lies in its common sense simplicity which he aptly describes as follows: '" the concept community ofpractice is neither new nor old. It has both the eye-opening character ofnovelty and the forgotten familiarity ofobviousness - but perhaps that is the mark of our most useful insights (ibid.:7). The focus on participation implies that for individuals, learning is an issue ofengaging in and contributing to the practices oftheir communities. For communities, it entails refining their practice and ensuring new generations ofmembers (Wenger 1998). This implies that learning cannot be a separate activity. " It is not something we do when we do nothing else or stop doing when we do something else" (ibid.:8) Learning is something we can 'assume', irrespective ofwhether it is visible or not or whether we 79
agree with the way it takes place or not. Even "failing to learn involves learning something else instead" (ibid.). Learning is an integral part ofour daily lives and is represented by our participation in our communities and organisations. While we may know this, we have not developed systemic ways oftalking about this 'familiar experience'. Our perspectives on learning are important because what we think about learning influences both where we recognise learning and our actions, should we wish to influence learning (Wenger 1998). Our conception oflearning has a profound effect on interventions and models that we prescribe for learning. "(A) key implication ofour attempts to organise learning is that we must become reflective with regard to our own discourses oflearning and to their effects on the way we design for learning" (ibid.:9). (K)nowing involves primarily active participation in social communities" (Wenger 1998: 10); it is about valuing the 'work ofcommunity building' and ensuring that "participants have access to the resources necessary to learn what they need to learn in order to make decisions that fully engage their own knowledgeability (ibid.). A social theory oflearning is not a purely academic exercise, but is ofvalue to practitioners including teachers, managers and policy makers (ibid.). 80
- Page 43 and 44: In Chapter Five, I set up a narrati
- Page 45 and 46: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 INTRODUCTION
- Page 47 and 48: As indicated in the previous chapte
- Page 49 and 50: This view is supported by Putman an
- Page 51 and 52: Learning is social in nature (Putma
- Page 53 and 54: Constant reflection on and understa
- Page 55 and 56: Teachers drew on their membership i
- Page 57 and 58: The above arguments about the lack
- Page 59 and 60: change. She highlights the importan
- Page 61 and 62: Differences in the cultures oflearn
- Page 63 and 64: persons and is not considered solel
- Page 65 and 66: and offers insights into how learni
- Page 67 and 68: America. Goodson (1992) and Calderh
- Page 69 and 70: learned meaning and value for them
- Page 71 and 72: 'accommodation' and intimates that
- Page 73 and 74: staffroom and a 'pragmatic' teacher
- Page 75 and 76: Davisson (1984), Lumsden and Scott
- Page 77 and 78: directive in that it guides choices
- Page 79 and 80: economic discourse, the economics p
- Page 81 and 82: • Understand and promote the impo
- Page 83 and 84: 2.7 CONCLUSION This chapter began b
- Page 85 and 86: (Walford 2001; Anderson 1999). With
- Page 87 and 88: • It places value on the research
- Page 89 and 90: The main research question in this
- Page 91 and 92: Lave and Wenger emphasise the centr
- Page 93: 3.3.2 The Work ofWenger (1998): Com
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 3.3: Refined intersection of
- Page 99 and 100: eflecting. The ability of a communi
- Page 101 and 102: object to something that in reality
- Page 103 and 104: practice is not just an aggregate o
- Page 105 and 106: system or institution and the influ
- Page 107 and 108: 3.3.2.4 Learning Practice has to be
- Page 109 and 110: new possibilities for meaning. Brok
- Page 111 and 112: These characteristics indicate that
- Page 113 and 114: engage with one another and acknowl
- Page 115 and 116: A structural model ofa community of
- Page 117 and 118: who were regarded as peripheral. A
- Page 119 and 120: Ideally I would have wanted teacher
- Page 121 and 122: they represent key ingredients in s
- Page 123 and 124: that the Wenger framework presents
- Page 125 and 126: more useful and effective than part
- Page 127 and 128: 3.6 CONCLUSION This chapter provide
- Page 129 and 130: • While my professional input int
- Page 131 and 132: • Cycle ofhypothesis and theory b
- Page 133 and 134: observer played themselves out. A c
- Page 135 and 136: organised events and linked communi
- Page 137 and 138: In keeping with ethnographic princi
- Page 139 and 140: In this qualitative study, my inter
- Page 141 and 142: collection. He questions whether co
- Page 143 and 144: physical context, the complex body
make good sense (see Figure 3.1). The concept 'community <strong>of</strong>practice' is a constitutive<br />
element <strong>of</strong>a broader conceptual framework, whose'analytical power' resides <strong>in</strong> its<br />
ability to <strong>in</strong>tegrate the components <strong>of</strong>the model (ibid.:6).<br />
Figure 3.1: The Elements <strong>of</strong>Wenger's Social Theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as<br />
experience<br />
<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Leam<strong>in</strong>g as<br />
belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The usefulness <strong>of</strong>Wenger's theory <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice lies <strong>in</strong> its<br />
common sense simplicity which he aptly describes as follows:<br />
'" the concept community <strong>of</strong>practice is neither new nor old. It has both the eye-open<strong>in</strong>g<br />
character <strong>of</strong>novelty and the forgotten familiarity <strong>of</strong>obviousness - but perhaps that is the<br />
mark <strong>of</strong> our most useful <strong>in</strong>sights (ibid.:7).<br />
The focus on participation implies that for <strong>in</strong>dividuals, learn<strong>in</strong>g is an issue <strong>of</strong>engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
and contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the practices <strong>of</strong>their communities. For communities, it entails<br />
ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their practice and ensur<strong>in</strong>g new generations <strong>of</strong>members (Wenger 1998). This<br />
implies that learn<strong>in</strong>g cannot be a separate activity. " It is not someth<strong>in</strong>g we do when we<br />
do noth<strong>in</strong>g else or stop do<strong>in</strong>g when we do someth<strong>in</strong>g else" (ibid.:8) <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g we can 'assume', irrespective <strong>of</strong>whether it is visible or not or whether we<br />
79