Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

make good sense (see Figure 3.1). The concept 'community ofpractice' is a constitutive element ofa broader conceptual framework, whose'analytical power' resides in its ability to integrate the components ofthe model (ibid.:6). Figure 3.1: The Elements ofWenger's Social Theory of Learning Learning as experience Learning Meaning Leaming as belonging The usefulness ofWenger's theory oflearning in a community ofpractice lies in its common sense simplicity which he aptly describes as follows: '" the concept community ofpractice is neither new nor old. It has both the eye-opening character ofnovelty and the forgotten familiarity ofobviousness - but perhaps that is the mark of our most useful insights (ibid.:7). The focus on participation implies that for individuals, learning is an issue ofengaging in and contributing to the practices oftheir communities. For communities, it entails refining their practice and ensuring new generations ofmembers (Wenger 1998). This implies that learning cannot be a separate activity. " It is not something we do when we do nothing else or stop doing when we do something else" (ibid.:8) Learning is something we can 'assume', irrespective ofwhether it is visible or not or whether we 79

agree with the way it takes place or not. Even "failing to learn involves learning something else instead" (ibid.). Learning is an integral part ofour daily lives and is represented by our participation in our communities and organisations. While we may know this, we have not developed systemic ways oftalking about this 'familiar experience'. Our perspectives on learning are important because what we think about learning influences both where we recognise learning and our actions, should we wish to influence learning (Wenger 1998). Our conception oflearning has a profound effect on interventions and models that we prescribe for learning. "(A) key implication ofour attempts to organise learning is that we must become reflective with regard to our own discourses oflearning and to their effects on the way we design for learning" (ibid.:9). (K)nowing involves primarily active participation in social communities" (Wenger 1998: 10); it is about valuing the 'work ofcommunity building' and ensuring that "participants have access to the resources necessary to learn what they need to learn in order to make decisions that fully engage their own knowledgeability (ibid.). A social theory oflearning is not a purely academic exercise, but is ofvalue to practitioners including teachers, managers and policy makers (ibid.). 80

make good sense (see Figure 3.1). The concept 'community <strong>of</strong>practice' is a constitutive<br />

element <strong>of</strong>a broader conceptual framework, whose'analytical power' resides <strong>in</strong> its<br />

ability to <strong>in</strong>tegrate the components <strong>of</strong>the model (ibid.:6).<br />

Figure 3.1: The Elements <strong>of</strong>Wenger's Social Theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as<br />

experience<br />

<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Leam<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The usefulness <strong>of</strong>Wenger's theory <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice lies <strong>in</strong> its<br />

common sense simplicity which he aptly describes as follows:<br />

'" the concept community <strong>of</strong>practice is neither new nor old. It has both the eye-open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

character <strong>of</strong>novelty and the forgotten familiarity <strong>of</strong>obviousness - but perhaps that is the<br />

mark <strong>of</strong> our most useful <strong>in</strong>sights (ibid.:7).<br />

The focus on participation implies that for <strong>in</strong>dividuals, learn<strong>in</strong>g is an issue <strong>of</strong>engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

and contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the practices <strong>of</strong>their communities. For communities, it entails<br />

ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their practice and ensur<strong>in</strong>g new generations <strong>of</strong>members (Wenger 1998). This<br />

implies that learn<strong>in</strong>g cannot be a separate activity. " It is not someth<strong>in</strong>g we do when we<br />

do noth<strong>in</strong>g else or stop do<strong>in</strong>g when we do someth<strong>in</strong>g else" (ibid.:8) <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g we can 'assume', irrespective <strong>of</strong>whether it is visible or not or whether we<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!