16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, Jessop (1997:40) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that:<br />

Arguably, qualitative methods are more sensitive to the nuances and texture <strong>of</strong> complex<br />

social realities than the scientific method. This is l<strong>in</strong>ked to their reliance on textual<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> data, which are more <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to open up shades <strong>of</strong>mean<strong>in</strong>g than numbers.<br />

Qualitative methods are also particularistic <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tent rather than universally generalisable<br />

to other contexts, as is <strong>in</strong> the case with most quantitative research.<br />

My research study was certa<strong>in</strong>ly rooted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terpretative, qualitative paradigm, as this<br />

approach was more likely to provide opportunities to discover mean<strong>in</strong>gs and realities and<br />

rich tones and shades <strong>of</strong>the research context. Qualitative research affords a better means<br />

<strong>of</strong>reflect<strong>in</strong>g social reality than quantitative research. Qualitative researchers are<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g, that is, how people make sense <strong>of</strong>their lives, what they<br />

experience, how they <strong>in</strong>terpret their experiences and how they structure their social world<br />

(Merriam 1988). Interpretivist research assumes that human action is <strong>in</strong>herently<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful. In order to understand a particular social action, it is important for the<br />

researcher to grasp the mean<strong>in</strong>gs that constitute that action. Human action has a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tentional content that suggests the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>action that it is. The mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>an action can<br />

only be grasped <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>the systems <strong>of</strong>mean<strong>in</strong>gs to which it belongs (Schwandt<br />

2003).<br />

L<strong>in</strong>coln and Guba (1985) co<strong>in</strong>ed the term 'naturalistic <strong>in</strong>quiry'. The follow<strong>in</strong>g are the key<br />

features <strong>of</strong>this approach:<br />

• The context <strong>in</strong>fluences the phenomena under study. Phenomena under study can<br />

only be understood <strong>in</strong> relationship to the time and context that spawned the said<br />

phenomena. This implies that research takes place <strong>in</strong> a natural sett<strong>in</strong>g, that is,<br />

where the phenomena actually occurred. These sett<strong>in</strong>gs are not contrived but<br />

occur naturally. The researcher should be aware <strong>of</strong>the various mean<strong>in</strong>gs that may<br />

exist <strong>in</strong> a given context. The aim <strong>of</strong>research <strong>in</strong> a natural sett<strong>in</strong>g is to get a real<br />

feel for the 'vibe' and ethos <strong>of</strong>the research site.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!