Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

the provision of appropriate professional development events and processes ... follow up the effects ofthese on teachers' thinking and practice...(Day 1999: 171). In addition to the crucial issue ofeffectiveness, communities ofpractice also offer opportunities for increased democratisation of the research process. This could include gathering ofdata, interpretation and sharing findings. There needs to be a shift on the part ofthe professional development sector from working on to working with teachers and the world ofpractice. Day (1999: 186) draws attention to the distinction between co-operation and collaboration in school-university partnerships and reminds us that collaboration "involves joint decision-making, requires time, careful negotiation, trust and effective communication... where both parties regard themselves as learners". Co-operation on the other hand entails definitive roles and power relationships where university experts conduct professional development and where little mutual learning is likely to occur. The challenge then is whether the field ofteacher education is ready to move towards acknowledging and accepting the conceptual analyses and interpretive knowledge of teachers as part ofa redefined knowledge base rather than the traditional approach to discovering new knowledge in the field ofteacher education. There is a need to challenge the linear 'trickle down' model ofteacher development as it currently exists, an idea also supported by Wesley and Buysse who suggest that teachers have to be acknowledged as knowledge producers (Wesley and Buysse 2001). Day (1999) notes that for learning to be successful, there has to be collaboration over an extended period oftime between teachers and outside individuals who may be able to complement the practical knowledge held by teachers. From the above discussion, it becomes clear that teacher education providers need to explore the possibility of forming university and 'community' partnerships that could provide richer and more meaningful experiences for in-service teachers through relevant teacher education programmes. Communities ofpractice as a theoretical approach to the problem ofreform implementation suggest that learning is occurring in practice. This 321

means that teacher development initiatives that employ a community ofpractice approach have to necessarily view teachers' practice as an essential component ofteacher learning. The ability to see communities ofpractice and how they serve to mediate teacher learning and teachers' response to policy such as C2005 is a first step toward harnessing that energy in the direction that supports positive change in classroom practice. Teacher learning communities must be seen as sites for mediating teachers' responses to institutional reform (Galluci 2003). They are important for sustaining momentum for change. Phillips (2003) reminds us that teacher learning communities can provide opportunities to create powerful learning for teachers, the result ofwhich is likely to be seen in improved student achievement, even in contexts where students are diverse in terms ofsocio-economic circumstances, academic ability and ethnic background. 8.3.9 Challenges in adopting a communities of practice framework for CPD In developing teacher development programmes, it is useful to take cognisance of the problematic issue of 'transfer' as the immediate manifestation ofthe products of teacher learning. Although Avery and Carlsen (2001) alert us to the potential that the development ofstrong subject content knowledge has for classroom practice, immediate transfer is not likely to occur. While it may be assumed that teachers who develop strong content knowledge are more likely to develop strong pedagogic content knowledge and become effective teachers as compared to teachers with weak content knowledge, it must be noted that teacher learning through professional development may not result in changed practice and improved student performance. Day and Sachs point to an increasing understanding by researchers and teacher developers in recent times, that continuing professional development" will not, should not, and cannot always produce direct 'pay-off' in classroom learning and student achievements. There are too many other variables which prevent immediate transfer oflearning" (Day and Sachs 2004:29). Continuing professional development can only have an indirect impact on student learning (Bolam and McMahon 2004). Adler, Slonimsky and Reed (2002: 136) note that a common assumption is that " ... knowledge ofsubject matter for teaching is ofprimary importance, for without this, teachers would not be able to engage their learners in high- 322

means that teacher development <strong>in</strong>itiatives that employ a community <strong>of</strong>practice approach<br />

have to necessarily view teachers' practice as an essential component <strong>of</strong>teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The ability to see communities <strong>of</strong>practice and how they serve to mediate teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and teachers' response to policy such as C2005 is a first step toward harness<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

energy <strong>in</strong> the direction that supports positive change <strong>in</strong> classroom practice. <strong>Teacher</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g communities must be seen as sites for mediat<strong>in</strong>g teachers' responses to<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional reform (Galluci 2003). They are important for susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g momentum for<br />

change. Phillips (2003) rem<strong>in</strong>ds us that teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities can provide<br />

opportunities to create powerful learn<strong>in</strong>g for teachers, the result <strong>of</strong>which is likely to be<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> improved student achievement, even <strong>in</strong> contexts where students are diverse <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong>socio-economic circumstances, academic ability and ethnic background.<br />

8.3.9 Challenges <strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g a communities <strong>of</strong> practice framework for CPD<br />

In develop<strong>in</strong>g teacher development programmes, it is useful to take cognisance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

problematic issue <strong>of</strong> 'transfer' as the immediate manifestation <strong>of</strong>the products <strong>of</strong> teacher<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g. Although Avery and Carlsen (2001) alert us to the potential that the<br />

development <strong>of</strong>strong subject content knowledge has for classroom practice, immediate<br />

transfer is not likely to occur. While it may be assumed that teachers who develop strong<br />

content knowledge are more likely to develop strong pedagogic content knowledge and<br />

become effective teachers as compared to teachers with weak content knowledge, it must<br />

be noted that teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g through pr<strong>of</strong>essional development may not result <strong>in</strong><br />

changed practice and improved student performance. Day and Sachs po<strong>in</strong>t to an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g understand<strong>in</strong>g by researchers and teacher developers <strong>in</strong> recent times, that<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essional development" will not, should not, and cannot always produce<br />

direct 'pay-<strong>of</strong>f' <strong>in</strong> classroom learn<strong>in</strong>g and student achievements. There are too many<br />

other variables which prevent immediate transfer <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g" (Day and Sachs 2004:29).<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essional development can only have an <strong>in</strong>direct impact on student<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g (Bolam and McMahon 2004). Adler, Slonimsky and Reed (2002: 136) note that<br />

a common assumption is that " ... knowledge <strong>of</strong>subject matter for teach<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>of</strong>primary<br />

importance, for without this, teachers would not be able to engage their learners <strong>in</strong> high-<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!