16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for the purposes <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional development has been around for a long time (Day<br />

. 1999). Pr<strong>of</strong>essional development through network<strong>in</strong>g via teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities<br />

suggests that teachers understand that learn<strong>in</strong>g only from experience will limit<br />

development. <strong>Teacher</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g communities allow teachers to come together and learn<br />

from one another and to engage with curricular issues. It is the response to an important<br />

issue and that is that responsibility for cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essional development simply<br />

cannot be left to 'others' (namely bureaucrats <strong>in</strong> the department <strong>of</strong>education).<br />

Christie et al (2004) rem<strong>in</strong>d us about the power and potential <strong>of</strong>human agency and<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g with CPD but warn that this must be complemented by state<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement. They suggest that the Department <strong>of</strong>Education take ownership and<br />

responsibility for CPD programmes and lend supportto voluntary formations such as<br />

teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities so as to enhance their susta<strong>in</strong>ability. A powerful feature <strong>of</strong><br />

teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities is that they lend themselves to teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

autonomy, where teachers <strong>of</strong>their own accord elect to participate <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>of</strong>their own choice. It is not difficult to understand why<br />

contrived networks legislated by Department <strong>of</strong>Education <strong>of</strong>ficials are likely to<br />

encounter resistance from teachers. Such networks <strong>of</strong>ten have as the agenda, the<br />

uncritical implementation <strong>of</strong>new education policy (Day 1999). 'Contrived collegiality'<br />

entrenches power relationships between participants and underm<strong>in</strong>es teachers coerced<br />

<strong>in</strong>to such networks (Hargreaves 1994). In their endeavours to improve student learn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

teachers <strong>of</strong>ten embrace contrived "system-<strong>in</strong>itiated pr<strong>of</strong>essional development<br />

partnerships and collaborations" but later encounter much "emotional turmoil and ripples<br />

<strong>of</strong> change... (that can) ... threaten self-image and self-esteem" (Day 1999: 188). Day<br />

argues that"... the build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>jo<strong>in</strong>t, authentic purpose, trust and mutual understand<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

and the provision <strong>of</strong> support and cont<strong>in</strong>uity ..." are crucial to the development <strong>of</strong><br />

successful collaborative <strong>in</strong>itiatives (ibid.).<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!