Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ... Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

pfeiffer.nele60
from pfeiffer.nele60 More from this publisher
16.08.2013 Views

share his classroom experiences with the group. He had a good sense of humour and easy attitude, which helped people to relax. John and Cindy's allegiance to the TEMS group was indeed remarkable. It would have been easy for John or Cindy to have tendered their apologies for that session and continued with their other commitments. However, they chose to be present despite other demands on their time. Communities ofpractice are 'not self-contained' entities, but develop in larger historical, social, and institutional contexts, with specific resources and constraints (Wenger 1998). The TEMS community ofpractice had developed in response to radical curriculum change that was beyond the control ofthe TEMS teachers. Although the practice ofthe community may be influenced by conditions outside the control of its members, the practice was still produced by the participants within the resources and constraints of their situations, and was therefore their response to their conditions. TEMS teachers determined the duration and timing ofthe programme and the extent oftheir participation and involvement in the practice ofthe community. Participants are, however, certainly located within a broader system or institution and the influence of such institutions can indeed be pervasive. A community ofpractice can respond to the conditions imposed by the institution in ways that are not determined by the institution. To do what they are expected to do, participants produce a practice with an "inventiveness that is all theirs" (Wenger 1998: 80). Their inventive resourcefulness applies equally to what the institution probably wants and also to what it probably does not want. In terms ofwhat the institution (in this case the Department ofEducation) would want, that is, competent EMS teachers, the TEMS teachers had developed EMS knowledge and pedagogic skills in order to perform their jobs as EMS teachers. However, in developing their own community ofpractice, they often scorned the efforts ofthe Department ofEducation by indicating their unwillingness to take part in department run workshops and expressed a general dissatisfaction with the nature of such workshops. The following extract from final interviews with Shirley is an indication ofteachers' negative attitudes towards their employer, the Department ofEducation. 291

MM: Shirley: How many EMS workshops have you attended that were run by the department? One last year. It was OBE training but we didn't touch on EMS. They just told us OBE and it was more HSS. And at the end of that HSS workshop, they gave us a brief feedback on what is EMS, that's all. No one sat there and told US how to teach EMS and what is EMS. So technically speaking, we did not have a workshop on EMS, except the one I had in school with you. That was the first one that I was exposed to. Participants developed and produced a practice to deal with what they understood to be their enterprise. Their practice as it unfolded belonged to their community in a fundamental sense. So although conditions, resources and demands may have influenced the community ofpractice, it was the participants who negotiated these constraints and shaped the practice. The TEMS teacher learning community also presented tensions that the participants had to negotiate. The essential tension ofprofessional development, that of curriculum development and deepening subject matter knowledge was prevalent in the TEMS community. Curriculum development and the development ofpedagogic content knowledge focuses on the improvement ofstudent learning, while teachers' attempts at deepening subject matter knowledge focuses on teachers as students ofsubject matter. Some teachers (Shirley and Kim in particular) were essentially concerned with the direct applicability oftheir learning to their classroom practice, and could be viewed as product driven. Grossman et al (2001) note that the occupational reality ofteaching does not permit the time and space for teachers to read without an immediate apparent goal. Reading and turning newly acquired subject matter knowledge into concrete ideas for teaching certainly is a challenge for most teachers. Others teachers, (John and Debbie and Mary) were also interested in personal intellectual renewal. They saw the need to acquire subject matter knowledge through reading. This tension became more overt in the mature stage ofthe community's development. Participants with competing goals generally kept each other in check. Seeking an appropriate balance between presenting information and facilitating teachers' construction ofnew practices was a dilemma that was dealt with and negotiated by the core group in their planning for the TEMS workshop sessions. 292

MM:<br />

Shirley:<br />

How many EMS workshops have you attended that were run by the<br />

department?<br />

One last year. It was OBE tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g but we didn't touch on EMS. They just<br />

told us OBE and it was more HSS. And at the end <strong>of</strong> that HSS workshop,<br />

they gave us a brief feedback on what is EMS, that's all. No one sat there<br />

and told US how to teach EMS and what is EMS. So technically speak<strong>in</strong>g, we<br />

did not have a workshop on EMS, except the one I had <strong>in</strong> school with you.<br />

That was the first one that I was exposed to.<br />

Participants developed and produced a practice to deal with what they understood to be<br />

their enterprise. Their practice as it unfolded belonged to their community <strong>in</strong> a<br />

fundamental sense. So although conditions, resources and demands may have <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

the community <strong>of</strong>practice, it was the participants who negotiated these constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

shaped the practice.<br />

The TEMS teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g community also presented tensions that the participants had<br />

to negotiate. The essential tension <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional development, that <strong>of</strong> curriculum<br />

development and deepen<strong>in</strong>g subject matter knowledge was prevalent <strong>in</strong> the TEMS<br />

community. Curriculum development and the development <strong>of</strong>pedagogic content<br />

knowledge focuses on the improvement <strong>of</strong>student learn<strong>in</strong>g, while teachers' attempts at<br />

deepen<strong>in</strong>g subject matter knowledge focuses on teachers as students <strong>of</strong>subject matter.<br />

Some teachers (Shirley and Kim <strong>in</strong> particular) were essentially concerned with the direct<br />

applicability <strong>of</strong>their learn<strong>in</strong>g to their classroom practice, and could be viewed as product<br />

driven. Grossman et al (2001) note that the occupational reality <strong>of</strong>teach<strong>in</strong>g does not<br />

permit the time and space for teachers to read without an immediate apparent goal.<br />

Read<strong>in</strong>g and turn<strong>in</strong>g newly acquired subject matter knowledge <strong>in</strong>to concrete ideas for<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>ly is a challenge for most teachers. Others teachers, (John and Debbie and<br />

Mary) were also <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> personal <strong>in</strong>tellectual renewal. They saw the need to acquire<br />

subject matter knowledge through read<strong>in</strong>g. This tension became more overt <strong>in</strong> the mature<br />

stage <strong>of</strong>the community's development. Participants with compet<strong>in</strong>g goals generally kept<br />

each other <strong>in</strong> check. Seek<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate balance between present<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

facilitat<strong>in</strong>g teachers' construction <strong>of</strong>new practices was a dilemma that was dealt with and<br />

negotiated by the core group <strong>in</strong> their plann<strong>in</strong>g for the TEMS workshop sessions.<br />

292

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!